Knowledge of Acute Coronary Syndrome Symptoms and the Intention to Call Emergency Medical Services in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Australians.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart, Lung and Circulation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2024.07.008
Ararso Baru Olani, Kathryn Eastwood, Stuart Howell, Amanda Buttery, Janet E Bray
{"title":"Knowledge of Acute Coronary Syndrome Symptoms and the Intention to Call Emergency Medical Services in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Australians.","authors":"Ararso Baru Olani, Kathryn Eastwood, Stuart Howell, Amanda Buttery, Janet E Bray","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2024.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prompt recognition of symptoms and response to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are crucial for reducing pre-hospital delay. This study compares culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) and non-CALD Australian populations in terms of their (i) ACS symptom knowledge and (ii) intention to call emergency medical services (EMS) for ACS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This cross-sectional study used data from HeartWatch, an online survey collected by the National Heart Foundation of Australia between 2018 and 2020 for Australian adults aged ≥18 years. CALD respondents were defined as non-Indigenous individuals who reported speaking a language other than English at home. Characteristics associated with ACS symptom knowledge and EMS calling intentions were analysed using multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 31,919 respondents, 16.3% were from CALD backgrounds (n=5,212). Compared with non-CALD, CALD respondents were less likely to name any ACS symptom (63.0% vs 76.0%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.70) and were less likely to state that they would call an ambulance for ACS (50.2% vs 72.1%; AOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.50-0.57). Almost one-quarter (23.0%) of CALD respondents reported not knowing what they would do. In both groups, males, individuals aged ≤60 years, and those with diabetes were less likely to name an ACS symptom and had lower intention to call an ambulance. Those unable to list a single ACS symptom also had a lower intention to call an ambulance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knowledge of ACS symptoms and intention to call an ambulance were lower among CALD respondents. The demographics of those with low ACS symptom knowledge and EMS calling intention were similar in the two groups. Future education efforts in Australia should focus on promoting ACS symptom knowledge and EMS use and should target these groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":" ","pages":"1659-1669"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2024.07.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prompt recognition of symptoms and response to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are crucial for reducing pre-hospital delay. This study compares culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) and non-CALD Australian populations in terms of their (i) ACS symptom knowledge and (ii) intention to call emergency medical services (EMS) for ACS.

Method: This cross-sectional study used data from HeartWatch, an online survey collected by the National Heart Foundation of Australia between 2018 and 2020 for Australian adults aged ≥18 years. CALD respondents were defined as non-Indigenous individuals who reported speaking a language other than English at home. Characteristics associated with ACS symptom knowledge and EMS calling intentions were analysed using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Of 31,919 respondents, 16.3% were from CALD backgrounds (n=5,212). Compared with non-CALD, CALD respondents were less likely to name any ACS symptom (63.0% vs 76.0%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.70) and were less likely to state that they would call an ambulance for ACS (50.2% vs 72.1%; AOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.50-0.57). Almost one-quarter (23.0%) of CALD respondents reported not knowing what they would do. In both groups, males, individuals aged ≤60 years, and those with diabetes were less likely to name an ACS symptom and had lower intention to call an ambulance. Those unable to list a single ACS symptom also had a lower intention to call an ambulance.

Conclusions: Knowledge of ACS symptoms and intention to call an ambulance were lower among CALD respondents. The demographics of those with low ACS symptom knowledge and EMS calling intention were similar in the two groups. Future education efforts in Australia should focus on promoting ACS symptom knowledge and EMS use and should target these groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有不同文化和语言背景的澳大利亚人对急性冠状动脉综合征症状的了解以及拨打紧急医疗服务电话的意愿。
背景:对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)症状的及时识别和应对是减少院前延误的关键。本研究比较了澳大利亚不同文化和语言群体(CALD)和非CALD群体在以下两方面的情况:(i) ACS症状知识;(ii) ACS呼叫紧急医疗服务(EMS)的意向:这项横断面研究使用了澳大利亚国家心脏基金会(National Heart Foundation of Australia)在 2018 年至 2020 年期间针对年龄≥18 岁的澳大利亚成年人收集的在线调查 "心脏观察"(HeartWatch)数据。CALD受访者被定义为报告在家中讲英语以外语言的非土著人。采用多变量逻辑回归分析了与ACS症状知识和EMS呼叫意向相关的特征:在31,919名受访者中,16.3%来自CALD背景(n=5,212)。与非 CALD 受访者相比,CALD 受访者不太可能说出任何 ACS 症状(63.0% vs 76.0%;调整赔率[AOR] 0.66;95% 置信区间[CI] 0.61-0.70),也不太可能表示会为 ACS 叫救护车(50.2% vs 72.1%;AOR 0.53;95% CI 0.50-0.57)。近四分之一(23.0%)的 CALD 受访者表示不知道自己会怎么做。在两组受访者中,男性、年龄≤60 岁者和糖尿病患者不太可能说出 ACS 症状,呼叫救护车的意愿也较低。无法说出单个冠状动脉综合征症状的人呼叫救护车的意愿也较低:结论:CALD受访者对ACS症状的了解程度和呼叫救护车的意愿均较低。两组中对 ACS 症状了解较少的受访者的人口统计学特征和 EMS 召唤意愿相似。澳大利亚未来的教育工作应侧重于促进对 ACS 症状的了解和 EMS 的使用,并应以这些群体为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
期刊最新文献
Qualitative Content Analysis of Unplanned Readmissions in Patients With Acute Heart Failure. Radiofrequency and Cryoablation as Energy Sources in the Cox-Maze Procedure: A Meta-Analysis of Rhythm Outcomes. High-Intensity Interval Training in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review. Validation of a Prediction Model From Quantitative Coronary Angiography to Detect Ischaemic Lesions as Evaluated by Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve. The State of STEMI Care Across NSW: A Comparison of Rural, Regional, and Metropolitan Centres.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1