Creating a Learning Health System in a Cancer Center: Generalizability of an Electronic Health Record Phenotype for Advanced Solid Cancer.

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY JCO oncology practice Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1200/OP.24.00389
Anne M Walling, Karl A Lorenz, Anita Yuan, Claire E O'Hanlon, Michael McClean, Benjamin Fayyazuddin Ljungberg, Karleen F Giannitrapani, Selen Bozkurt, Sidharth Anand, John Glaspy, Neil S Wenger, Charlotta Lindvall
{"title":"Creating a Learning Health System in a Cancer Center: Generalizability of an Electronic Health Record Phenotype for Advanced Solid Cancer.","authors":"Anne M Walling, Karl A Lorenz, Anita Yuan, Claire E O'Hanlon, Michael McClean, Benjamin Fayyazuddin Ljungberg, Karleen F Giannitrapani, Selen Bozkurt, Sidharth Anand, John Glaspy, Neil S Wenger, Charlotta Lindvall","doi":"10.1200/OP.24.00389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To test the generalizability of an electronic health record (EHR) phenotype for patients with advanced solid cancer, which was previously developed in a single cancer center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared an algorithm to identify patients with advanced solid cancer from a random sample of patients with active cancer in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) and an academic cancer center with a human-coded reference standard between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the human-coded reference standard, the algorithm had high specificity (93%; 95% CI, 87 to 99 and 97%; 95% CI, 93 to 100) and reasonable sensitivity (85%; 95% CI, 76 to 94 and 87%; 95% CI, 77 to 97) in the VA and academic cancer center populations, respectively. Patients with advanced cancer (compared with those with active nonadvanced cancer) had higher mortality at the VA and academic cancer center (29.2% and 17.0% 6-month mortality <i>v</i> 6.8% and 3.5%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This EHR phenotype can be used to measure and improve the quality of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer within and across health care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2400389"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.24.00389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To test the generalizability of an electronic health record (EHR) phenotype for patients with advanced solid cancer, which was previously developed in a single cancer center.

Methods: We compared an algorithm to identify patients with advanced solid cancer from a random sample of patients with active cancer in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) and an academic cancer center with a human-coded reference standard between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019.

Results: Compared with the human-coded reference standard, the algorithm had high specificity (93%; 95% CI, 87 to 99 and 97%; 95% CI, 93 to 100) and reasonable sensitivity (85%; 95% CI, 76 to 94 and 87%; 95% CI, 77 to 97) in the VA and academic cancer center populations, respectively. Patients with advanced cancer (compared with those with active nonadvanced cancer) had higher mortality at the VA and academic cancer center (29.2% and 17.0% 6-month mortality v 6.8% and 3.5%), respectively.

Conclusion: This EHR phenotype can be used to measure and improve the quality of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer within and across health care settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在癌症中心创建学习型医疗系统:晚期实体癌电子健康记录表型的推广性。
目的:测试晚期实体癌患者电子健康记录(EHR)表型的通用性:我们比较了退伍军人健康管理局(VA)和一家学术癌症中心在 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间从活动性癌症患者随机抽样中识别晚期实体癌患者的算法与人工编码参考标准:与人类编码参考标准相比,该算法在退伍军人健康管理局和学术癌症中心人群中分别具有较高的特异性(93%;95% CI,87 至 99 和 97%;95% CI,93 至 100)和合理的灵敏度(85%;95% CI,76 至 94 和 87%;95% CI,77 至 97)。在退伍军人事务部和学术癌症中心,晚期癌症患者(与活动性非晚期癌症患者相比)的死亡率较高(6 个月死亡率分别为 29.2% 和 17.0% 对 6.8% 和 3.5%):这种电子病历表型可用于衡量和改善医疗机构内部和医疗机构之间晚期癌症患者姑息治疗的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
期刊最新文献
Clinical Relevance of Intensive Laboratory Monitoring With Standard Venetoclax Ramp-Up for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Real-World Experience. Evaluation of the Impact of Monitoring for Tumor Lysis During Venetoclax Ramp-Up in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Routine Clinical Practice. Management of Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update Clinical Insights. Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer: Key Concepts for Optimizing Diagnosis and Treatment. Did I Mess Up Today?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1