Most Common Symptomatic Adverse Reactions of Cancer Treatments From US Drug Labels (2015-2021) to Inform Selection of Patient-Reported Outcomes.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS Value in Health Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.009
Erica G Horodniceanu, Tejaswi Datla, Meena N Murugappan, Bindu Kanapuru, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, Erin Larkins, Paul Kluetz, Vishal Bhatnagar
{"title":"Most Common Symptomatic Adverse Reactions of Cancer Treatments From US Drug Labels (2015-2021) to Inform Selection of Patient-Reported Outcomes.","authors":"Erica G Horodniceanu, Tejaswi Datla, Meena N Murugappan, Bindu Kanapuru, Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, Erin Larkins, Paul Kluetz, Vishal Bhatnagar","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in cancer clinical trials (CTs) is important to characterize treatment tolerability. Cancer therapies approved over the past decade have expanded the types of expected toxicities. To inform future symptomatic AE PRO item selection, we identified the most common symptomatic adverse reactions from recently approved products.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed approvals from 2015 to 2021 for lung, breast, and hematologic cancer indications. Using United States Prescribing Information safety data, we recorded symptomatic adverse reactions reported in ≥20% of patients in the experimental arm of CTs supporting approvals. We calculated the proportion of arms reporting each symptomatic adverse reaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 130 experimental arms were included (lung = 30, breast = 10, hematologic = 90). For all cancer types, fatigue and diarrhea were reported in >50% of the arms. Nausea was reported in ≥50% of the arms for all except lung. Vomiting, decreased appetite, and alopecia, were reported in ≥50% of breast cancer arms. Rash, musculoskeletal pain, and cough were reported in >50% of leukemia/lymphoma arms. Cough was common (50%) in multiple myeloma arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Heterogeneity in symptomatic adverse reactions across CTs supports the use of item libraries when building a PRO strategy to assess tolerability. Fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea were the most frequent symptomatic adverse reactions reported in contemporary cancer CTs and could provide a starting point when selecting PRO symptomatic AE items. Additional symptomatic AE PRO items should be selected based on the mechanism of action, early clinical data, published literature, and patient and clinician input.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2024.09.009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in cancer clinical trials (CTs) is important to characterize treatment tolerability. Cancer therapies approved over the past decade have expanded the types of expected toxicities. To inform future symptomatic AE PRO item selection, we identified the most common symptomatic adverse reactions from recently approved products.

Methods: We reviewed approvals from 2015 to 2021 for lung, breast, and hematologic cancer indications. Using United States Prescribing Information safety data, we recorded symptomatic adverse reactions reported in ≥20% of patients in the experimental arm of CTs supporting approvals. We calculated the proportion of arms reporting each symptomatic adverse reaction.

Results: In total, 130 experimental arms were included (lung = 30, breast = 10, hematologic = 90). For all cancer types, fatigue and diarrhea were reported in >50% of the arms. Nausea was reported in ≥50% of the arms for all except lung. Vomiting, decreased appetite, and alopecia, were reported in ≥50% of breast cancer arms. Rash, musculoskeletal pain, and cough were reported in >50% of leukemia/lymphoma arms. Cough was common (50%) in multiple myeloma arms.

Conclusions: Heterogeneity in symptomatic adverse reactions across CTs supports the use of item libraries when building a PRO strategy to assess tolerability. Fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea were the most frequent symptomatic adverse reactions reported in contemporary cancer CTs and could provide a starting point when selecting PRO symptomatic AE items. Additional symptomatic AE PRO items should be selected based on the mechanism of action, early clinical data, published literature, and patient and clinician input.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国药品标签中癌症治疗最常见的症状性不良反应(2015-2021 年),为选择患者报告结果提供依据。
目的:在癌症临床试验(CTs)中纳入患者报告结果(PROs)来评估症状性不良事件(AEs)对于描述治疗耐受性非常重要。过去十年中批准的癌症疗法扩大了预期毒性的类型。为了给未来的症状性 AE PRO 项目选择提供信息,我们确定了最近批准的产品中最常见的症状性不良反应:我们回顾了 2015-2021 年肺癌、乳腺癌和血液肿瘤适应症的批准情况。利用美国处方信息安全性数据,我们记录了支持批准的 CT 实验臂中≥20% 的患者报告的症状性不良反应。我们计算了报告每种症状性不良反应的试验组比例:结果:共纳入 130 个实验臂(肺癌=30 个,乳腺癌=10 个,血液肿瘤=90 个)。在所有癌症类型中,超过 50% 的实验组报告了疲劳和腹泻。除肺癌外,≥50% 的实验组报告有恶心症状。≥50%的乳腺癌治疗组出现呕吐、食欲下降和脱发。在白血病/淋巴瘤治疗组中,报告皮疹、肌肉骨骼疼痛和咳嗽的比例>50%。在多发性骨髓瘤治疗组中,咳嗽很常见(50%):结论:不同临床试验中症状性不良反应的异质性支持在建立PRO策略以评估耐受性时使用项目库。疲劳、腹泻和恶心是当代癌症 CT 中最常见的症状性不良反应,可作为选择 PRO 症状性 AE 项目的起点。应根据作用机制、早期临床数据、已发表文献以及患者和临床医生的意见选择其他症状性 AE PRO 项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
期刊最新文献
Value Attribution for Combination Treatments: Two Potential Solutions for an Insoluble Problem. Evaluating the health and economic impacts of return-to-work interventions: a modelling study. Exploring social preferences for health and wellbeing across the digital divide. A qualitative investigation based on tasks taken from an online discrete choice experiment. Quantifying low-value care in Germany: An observational study using statutory health insurance data from 2018 to 2021. Indirect Costs of Alzheimer's Disease: Unpaid Caregiver Burden and Patient Productivity Loss.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1