Maria Sandbothe, Britta Hasemeier, Elisa Schipper, Nora Schaumann, Hans Kreipe, Ulrich Lehmann, Stephan Bartels
{"title":"Diagnostic utility of ESR1 mutation detection in liquid biopsy of metastatic breast cancer patients.","authors":"Maria Sandbothe, Britta Hasemeier, Elisa Schipper, Nora Schaumann, Hans Kreipe, Ulrich Lehmann, Stephan Bartels","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03942-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Molecular analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from peripheral blood plasma samples of metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients is of rising interest to find optimal therapeutic strategies. Detection of emerging resistance mutations against endocrine therapy is possible with this approach. Here we present the applicability of a laboratory-developed NGS assay in molecular pathology routine diagnostic, covering four genes with therapeutic (ESR1, PIK3CA, ERBB2) and prognostic (TP53) consequences in metastatic BC. We analyzed 162 liquid biopsy samples and 25 corresponding metastases from metastatic BC patients. In the liquid biopsies, we detected ESR1 mutations in 42 cases (25.9%) and ERBB2 mutations in six cases (3.7%), arguing for a change in therapy to fulvestrant, elacestrant, or neratinib. Furthermore, 17 cases had detectable TP53 mutations, associated with resistance against endocrine therapy. We conclude that liquid biopsy testing is a noninvasive, sensitive, and helpful method to optimize therapeutic decisions in metastatic BC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03942-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Molecular analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from peripheral blood plasma samples of metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients is of rising interest to find optimal therapeutic strategies. Detection of emerging resistance mutations against endocrine therapy is possible with this approach. Here we present the applicability of a laboratory-developed NGS assay in molecular pathology routine diagnostic, covering four genes with therapeutic (ESR1, PIK3CA, ERBB2) and prognostic (TP53) consequences in metastatic BC. We analyzed 162 liquid biopsy samples and 25 corresponding metastases from metastatic BC patients. In the liquid biopsies, we detected ESR1 mutations in 42 cases (25.9%) and ERBB2 mutations in six cases (3.7%), arguing for a change in therapy to fulvestrant, elacestrant, or neratinib. Furthermore, 17 cases had detectable TP53 mutations, associated with resistance against endocrine therapy. We conclude that liquid biopsy testing is a noninvasive, sensitive, and helpful method to optimize therapeutic decisions in metastatic BC.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.