S100 and CD34 positive spindle cell tumors of the uterine cervix with EGFR mutation: a hitherto unrecognized neoplasm phenotypically and epigenetically overlapping with "NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms" of the uterus.
Michael Michal, Josef Kuruc, Veronika Hájková, Květoslava Michalová, Natálie Klubíčková
{"title":"S100 and CD34 positive spindle cell tumors of the uterine cervix with EGFR mutation: a hitherto unrecognized neoplasm phenotypically and epigenetically overlapping with \"NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms\" of the uterus.","authors":"Michael Michal, Josef Kuruc, Veronika Hájková, Květoslava Michalová, Natálie Klubíčková","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03936-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasm represents an emerging entity included in the latest 5th edition of WHO classification of both soft tissue and female genital tumors. By immunohistochemistry, they are commonly positive for CD34, S100 protein, and CD30 and typically harbor fusions of kinase genes such as NTRK1/2/3, RET, and BRAF. In the gynecological tract, they typically affect the uterine cervix or uterine body. Most of the reported cases had fibrosarcoma-like morphology, occasionally showing perivascular and stromal hyalinization with only a few cases showing a less cellular spindle cell proliferation. Except for one case with RET fusion, all other gynecological cases harbored exclusively NTRK1/2/3 fusions. Besides kinase gene fusions, the analogous tumors in soft tissues may also harbor activating EGFR or BRAF point mutations, but no such case has been described in the uterus. Herein we are reporting two cases from the uterine cervix showing morphology and molecular features previously unreported at this anatomic site. The patients were 46 and 34 years old and clinically presented with unremarkable cervical polyps each measuring 8 mm in diameter. Histologically, both cases had a rounded polypoid outline and were composed of hypocellular proliferation of bland spindle cells lacking mitotic activity and growing in a fibrotic stroma which was punctuated by prominent small vessels with thick hyalinized walls. Immunohistochemically, both showed a diffuse expression of CD34, CD30, and S100 protein, whereas SOX10 was negative. Both cases harbored exon 20 EGFR mutation and did not reveal any fusions or significant copy number changes. The patient in case 1 was treated by hysterectomy with salpingectomy with no other residual tumor detected, and she was alive and well 27 months after the diagnosis. The patient in case 2 had no other known tumors at the time of diagnosis, but no follow-up is available. We believe the reported cases represent a hitherto unrecognized variant of \"NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms\" of the uterine cervix with novel EGFR mutations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03936-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasm represents an emerging entity included in the latest 5th edition of WHO classification of both soft tissue and female genital tumors. By immunohistochemistry, they are commonly positive for CD34, S100 protein, and CD30 and typically harbor fusions of kinase genes such as NTRK1/2/3, RET, and BRAF. In the gynecological tract, they typically affect the uterine cervix or uterine body. Most of the reported cases had fibrosarcoma-like morphology, occasionally showing perivascular and stromal hyalinization with only a few cases showing a less cellular spindle cell proliferation. Except for one case with RET fusion, all other gynecological cases harbored exclusively NTRK1/2/3 fusions. Besides kinase gene fusions, the analogous tumors in soft tissues may also harbor activating EGFR or BRAF point mutations, but no such case has been described in the uterus. Herein we are reporting two cases from the uterine cervix showing morphology and molecular features previously unreported at this anatomic site. The patients were 46 and 34 years old and clinically presented with unremarkable cervical polyps each measuring 8 mm in diameter. Histologically, both cases had a rounded polypoid outline and were composed of hypocellular proliferation of bland spindle cells lacking mitotic activity and growing in a fibrotic stroma which was punctuated by prominent small vessels with thick hyalinized walls. Immunohistochemically, both showed a diffuse expression of CD34, CD30, and S100 protein, whereas SOX10 was negative. Both cases harbored exon 20 EGFR mutation and did not reveal any fusions or significant copy number changes. The patient in case 1 was treated by hysterectomy with salpingectomy with no other residual tumor detected, and she was alive and well 27 months after the diagnosis. The patient in case 2 had no other known tumors at the time of diagnosis, but no follow-up is available. We believe the reported cases represent a hitherto unrecognized variant of "NTRK-rearranged spindle cell neoplasms" of the uterine cervix with novel EGFR mutations.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.