Substance use during the COVID-19 pandemic among persons with traumatic spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional perspective.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2024.2400748
Yuying Chen, Huacong Wen, Anne Deutsch, Amanda Botticello, James G Lo, J Scott Richards
{"title":"Substance use during the COVID-19 pandemic among persons with traumatic spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional perspective.","authors":"Yuying Chen, Huacong Wen, Anne Deutsch, Amanda Botticello, James G Lo, J Scott Richards","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2400748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Analysis of data from two cohorts of Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Database (SCIMS) participants, pre-pandemic (2017-2019, <i>n</i> = 6368) and during pandemic (2020, <i>n</i> = 1889).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine differences in substance use during the pandemic compared to the years prior to the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>19 SCIMS Centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participant characteristics, wellness (depression, life satisfaction, resilience), participation, and substance use between the two cohorts were compared. Multiple logistic regression examined the association of the pandemic with substance use after accounting for other factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Characteristics of the two cohorts were similar. Cannabis and sedative uses were not greatly different (28.8% vs 25.1%, and 8.3% vs 6.6%) but did reach statistical significance. Non-prescribed opioid use was double for the pandemic group (6.6% vs 3.3%). Alcohol use patterns were similar across the two cohorts. Measures of wellness were similar, while the pandemic group reported lower participation. The odds of use of cannabis, sedatives, and opioids were 1.3, 1.3, and 2.2 times greater, respectively, for the pandemic cohort after accounting for demographics, wellness, and participation. Greater use of non-prescribed opioids was reported during the pandemic in the South compared to prior to the pandemic (13.8% vs 6.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pandemic may have been associated with increased use of non-prescribed substances in the traumatic spinal cord injury population. Efforts to pursue longitudinal investigations would be warranted for definitive analysis of trends. The provision of demonstrably effective substance use treatment resources delivered via accessible methods will likely be needed in this population, particularly opioid treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2400748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Analysis of data from two cohorts of Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Database (SCIMS) participants, pre-pandemic (2017-2019, n = 6368) and during pandemic (2020, n = 1889).

Objectives: To examine differences in substance use during the pandemic compared to the years prior to the pandemic.

Setting: 19 SCIMS Centers.

Methods: Participant characteristics, wellness (depression, life satisfaction, resilience), participation, and substance use between the two cohorts were compared. Multiple logistic regression examined the association of the pandemic with substance use after accounting for other factors.

Results: Characteristics of the two cohorts were similar. Cannabis and sedative uses were not greatly different (28.8% vs 25.1%, and 8.3% vs 6.6%) but did reach statistical significance. Non-prescribed opioid use was double for the pandemic group (6.6% vs 3.3%). Alcohol use patterns were similar across the two cohorts. Measures of wellness were similar, while the pandemic group reported lower participation. The odds of use of cannabis, sedatives, and opioids were 1.3, 1.3, and 2.2 times greater, respectively, for the pandemic cohort after accounting for demographics, wellness, and participation. Greater use of non-prescribed opioids was reported during the pandemic in the South compared to prior to the pandemic (13.8% vs 6.1%).

Conclusions: The pandemic may have been associated with increased use of non-prescribed substances in the traumatic spinal cord injury population. Efforts to pursue longitudinal investigations would be warranted for definitive analysis of trends. The provision of demonstrably effective substance use treatment resources delivered via accessible methods will likely be needed in this population, particularly opioid treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤性脊髓损伤患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间的药物使用情况:横断面视角。
研究设计:分析脊髓损伤模型系统数据库(SCIMS)两组参与者的数据,即大流行前(2017-2019年,n = 6368)和大流行期间(2020年,n = 1889)的数据:研究大流行期间与大流行前几年药物使用情况的差异:19 个 SCIMS 中心:比较两组参与者的特征、健康状况(抑郁、生活满意度、复原力)、参与情况和药物使用情况。在考虑其他因素后,多元逻辑回归分析了大流行与药物使用之间的关系:结果:两个群体的特征相似。大麻和镇静剂的使用率差别不大(28.8% 对 25.1%,8.3% 对 6.6%),但在统计学上有显著意义。非处方阿片类药物的使用是大流行组的两倍(6.6% 对 3.3%)。两组人群的饮酒模式相似。健康测量结果相似,但大流行病组的参与率较低。在考虑了人口统计学、健康状况和参与情况后,大流行人群使用大麻、镇静剂和阿片类药物的几率分别是其他人群的 1.3 倍、1.3 倍和 2.2 倍。与大流行之前相比(13.8% 对 6.1%),大流行期间南部地区报告的非处方类阿片使用率更高:结论:大流行可能与外伤性脊髓损伤人群使用非处方药物增加有关。为了对趋势进行明确分析,有必要进行纵向调查。在这一人群中,可能需要通过便捷的方法提供明显有效的药物使用治疗资源,尤其是阿片类药物治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
期刊最新文献
Embracing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Access (IDEA): Cultivating understanding internally to foster external change. First report of a new exoskeleton in incomplete spinal cord injury: FreeGait®. Improving current understanding of cognitive impairment in patients with a spinal cord injury: A UK-based clinician survey. Shelter-in-place during the COVID-19 pandemic: Impact on secondary health conditions, anxiety, loneliness, social isolation, social connectedness, and positive affect and well-being. The association between locus of control and general mental health in patients with lumbar spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1