Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative percutaneous synovial biopsy and aspirate compared with open biopsy for prosthetic shoulder infections.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.016
Peter Lapner, Diane Nam, Amar Cheema, Adnan Sheikh, Taryn Hodgdon, J Whitcomb Pollock, Tim Ramsay, Elham Sabri, Darren Drosdowech, Katie McIlquham, Baldwin Toye, Dominique Rouleau
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative percutaneous synovial biopsy and aspirate compared with open biopsy for prosthetic shoulder infections.","authors":"Peter Lapner, Diane Nam, Amar Cheema, Adnan Sheikh, Taryn Hodgdon, J Whitcomb Pollock, Tim Ramsay, Elham Sabri, Darren Drosdowech, Katie McIlquham, Baldwin Toye, Dominique Rouleau","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shoulder arthroplasty revision is associated with a high prevalence of prosthetic infection, and diagnosis remains difficult. The primary aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous synovial biopsy (PSB) and joint aspiration compared with open culture results in detecting infection in revision shoulder arthroplasty. The second aim was to determine whether biopsy location within the shoulder was associated with culture status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter prospective cohort study involving 4 sites and 69 patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty. The cohort was 57% female with a mean age of 64 years. Preoperative fluoroscopic-guided PSBs and aspirations were carried out by a musculoskeletal radiologist before revision shoulder arthroplasty. The original prostheses consisted of hemiarthroplasties, total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs), resurfacing TSA, reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSAs), and antibiotic spacers. Six synovial tissue biopsies from separate regions in the shoulder were obtained both preoperatively and intraoperatively. The shoulder joint was aspirated, and synovial fluid collected, if available. Infection was considered positive in the setting of 2 or more matching positive cultures. The PSB cultures were considered \"true positive\" if the PSB cultures matched the open biopsy cultures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen percent had positive infection based on PSB, and 23% had confirmed culture-positive infections based on intraoperative biopsy. The diagnostic accuracy of PSB compared with open biopsy was as follows: sensitivity 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.61), specificity 0.81 (95% CI 0.7-0.91), positive predictive value 0.37 (95% CI 0.13-0.61), negative predictive value 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.91), positive likelihood ratio 1.98, and negative likelihood ratio 0.77. Of the 71 patients from whom aspirates were collected, aspiration yielded synovial fluid in 33 patients. Preoperative aspiration detected no infections confirmed positive by open biopsy and correctly identified 81% of absent infections. The diagnostic accuracy of aspiration compared with open biopsy was as follows: sensitivity 0%, specificity 0.81 (95% CI 0.66-0.96), positive predictive value 0%, and negative predictive value 0.78 (95% CI 0.63-0.93). Biopsy location within the shoulder was not associated with infection status.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Preoperative aspiration detected none of the infections proven positive via open biopsy. Although PSB was superior to synovial fluid aspirate, poor likelihood ratios suggest that PSB is not useful as an isolated test in the preoperative workup of the potentially infected patient. Biopsy location was not associated with culture status suggesting that the capsule is uniformly infected, and the location of tissue biopsies does not appear to matter.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shoulder arthroplasty revision is associated with a high prevalence of prosthetic infection, and diagnosis remains difficult. The primary aim of the study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of percutaneous synovial biopsy (PSB) and joint aspiration compared with open culture results in detecting infection in revision shoulder arthroplasty. The second aim was to determine whether biopsy location within the shoulder was associated with culture status.

Methods: This was a multicenter prospective cohort study involving 4 sites and 69 patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty. The cohort was 57% female with a mean age of 64 years. Preoperative fluoroscopic-guided PSBs and aspirations were carried out by a musculoskeletal radiologist before revision shoulder arthroplasty. The original prostheses consisted of hemiarthroplasties, total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs), resurfacing TSA, reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSAs), and antibiotic spacers. Six synovial tissue biopsies from separate regions in the shoulder were obtained both preoperatively and intraoperatively. The shoulder joint was aspirated, and synovial fluid collected, if available. Infection was considered positive in the setting of 2 or more matching positive cultures. The PSB cultures were considered "true positive" if the PSB cultures matched the open biopsy cultures.

Results: Nineteen percent had positive infection based on PSB, and 23% had confirmed culture-positive infections based on intraoperative biopsy. The diagnostic accuracy of PSB compared with open biopsy was as follows: sensitivity 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.61), specificity 0.81 (95% CI 0.7-0.91), positive predictive value 0.37 (95% CI 0.13-0.61), negative predictive value 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.91), positive likelihood ratio 1.98, and negative likelihood ratio 0.77. Of the 71 patients from whom aspirates were collected, aspiration yielded synovial fluid in 33 patients. Preoperative aspiration detected no infections confirmed positive by open biopsy and correctly identified 81% of absent infections. The diagnostic accuracy of aspiration compared with open biopsy was as follows: sensitivity 0%, specificity 0.81 (95% CI 0.66-0.96), positive predictive value 0%, and negative predictive value 0.78 (95% CI 0.63-0.93). Biopsy location within the shoulder was not associated with infection status.

Discussion: Preoperative aspiration detected none of the infections proven positive via open biopsy. Although PSB was superior to synovial fluid aspirate, poor likelihood ratios suggest that PSB is not useful as an isolated test in the preoperative workup of the potentially infected patient. Biopsy location was not associated with culture status suggesting that the capsule is uniformly infected, and the location of tissue biopsies does not appear to matter.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
假体肩部感染的术前经皮滑膜活组织检查和抽吸与开放活组织检查的诊断准确性比较。
背景:肩关节置换术翻修与假体感染的高发病率有关,但诊断仍然很困难。本研究的主要目的是确定经皮滑膜活检(PSB)和关节抽吸与开放培养结果相比,在检测肩关节翻修术感染方面的诊断准确性。第二个目的是确定肩部活检位置是否与培养结果有关:这是一项多中心前瞻性队列研究,涉及四个研究机构和 69 名接受翻修肩关节置换术的患者。57%的患者为女性,平均年龄为64岁。翻修肩关节置换术前,由一名肌肉骨骼放射科医生在透视引导下进行PSB检查和抽吸。原始假体包括半关节置换术、全肩关节置换术(TSA)、肩关节再植术(TSA)、反向肩关节置换术(RSA)和抗生素垫片。术前和术中分别从肩关节的不同区域获取了六份滑膜组织活检样本。对肩关节进行抽吸,并收集滑液(如有)。如果出现两个或两个以上匹配的阳性培养物,则认为感染呈阳性。如果PSB培养结果与开放活检培养结果一致,则认为PSB培养结果为 "真阳性":结果:根据 PSB 结果,19% 的患者感染呈阳性,23% 的患者根据术中活检结果确认感染培养呈阳性。与开放活检相比,PSB 的诊断准确性如下:敏感性 0.37(95% CI 0.13-0.61),特异性 0.81(95% CI 0.7-0.91),阳性预测值 0.37(95% CI 0.13-0.61),阴性预测值 0.81(95% CI 0.70-0.91),阳性似然比 1.98,阴性似然比 0.77。在 71 例患者中,33 例患者抽出了滑膜液。术前抽液未发现经开放活检证实为阳性的感染,正确识别了81%的缺失感染。与开放活检相比,抽吸术的诊断准确性如下:敏感性 0%,特异性 0.81(95% CI 0.66-0.96),阳性预测值 0%,阴性预测值 0.78(95% CI 0.63-0.93)。肩部活检位置与感染状况无关:讨论:术前抽吸没有发现任何经开放活检证实为阳性的感染。尽管PSB优于滑膜液抽吸,但较低的似然比表明,PSB作为一种单独的检测方法在潜在感染患者的术前检查中并不实用。活检位置与培养状态无关,这表明关节囊受到的感染是一致的,组织活检的位置似乎也无关紧要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
After primary shoulder arthroplasty appropriate vancomycin antibiotic prophylaxis does not lead to increased infectious complications when compared to cefazolin. Lateralization of the humerus in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: can preoperative planning software predict postoperative lateralization and does lateralization influence outcomes? Pathological formation of subcoracoid bursa effusion on magnetic resonance imaging studies. Pain Relief Survivorship: A Comparison of Exactech Equinoxe Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Osteoarthritis. Tyrolean Iceman's arrow injury to the shoulder: New insights into extent and survival time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1