Can early treatment of lisfranc injuries without planned re-intervention be safely performed.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2024.09.015
Daniel T DeGenova, James L Iandoli, Anthony J Melaragno, Scott S Hyland, Sara E Dickinson, Brett Hoffman, Benjamin C Taylor
{"title":"Can early treatment of lisfranc injuries without planned re-intervention be safely performed.","authors":"Daniel T DeGenova, James L Iandoli, Anthony J Melaragno, Scott S Hyland, Sara E Dickinson, Brett Hoffman, Benjamin C Taylor","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2024.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Lisfranc complex is a unique combination of ligamentous and osseous relationships between the medial cuneiform and second metatarsal base that is often injured by high energy mechanisms. Fixation for these injuries is often operative; however, the optimal timing of surgical treatment has been debated. All patients who underwent operative fixation of a Lisfranc injury at a single urban tertiary care center were reviewed. Patient were split into two groups based on timing to fixation with one group being less than 24 h from presentation and a second group being greater than 24 h. There were 58 patients who underwent what was planned as final operative stabilization of their Lisfranc injury in less than 24 h and 41 patients who underwent fixation after more than 24 h. The early treatment of Lisfranc injuries did not lead to significant increases in follow up time, infections, time to weight bearing, union rates, or time to union compared patients treated with delayed fixation. There was a higher rate of superficial infection in the early intervention group, but it did not reach statistical significance. We believe our findings demonstrate that delayed fixation is not superior to early treatment of Lisfranc injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 Therapeutic retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2024.09.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Lisfranc complex is a unique combination of ligamentous and osseous relationships between the medial cuneiform and second metatarsal base that is often injured by high energy mechanisms. Fixation for these injuries is often operative; however, the optimal timing of surgical treatment has been debated. All patients who underwent operative fixation of a Lisfranc injury at a single urban tertiary care center were reviewed. Patient were split into two groups based on timing to fixation with one group being less than 24 h from presentation and a second group being greater than 24 h. There were 58 patients who underwent what was planned as final operative stabilization of their Lisfranc injury in less than 24 h and 41 patients who underwent fixation after more than 24 h. The early treatment of Lisfranc injuries did not lead to significant increases in follow up time, infections, time to weight bearing, union rates, or time to union compared patients treated with delayed fixation. There was a higher rate of superficial infection in the early intervention group, but it did not reach statistical significance. We believe our findings demonstrate that delayed fixation is not superior to early treatment of Lisfranc injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 Therapeutic retrospective comparative study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
能否安全地进行无计划再介入的 Lisfranc 损伤早期治疗?
Lisfranc 复合韧带是内侧楔形骨和第二跖骨基底之间韧带和骨关系的独特组合,经常受到高能量机制的损伤。这些损伤通常需要手术固定,但手术治疗的最佳时机一直存在争议。本文回顾了在一家城市三级医疗中心接受手术固定 Lisfranc 损伤的所有患者。根据固定时间将患者分为两组,一组患者的固定时间小于 24 小时,另一组患者的固定时间大于 24 小时。有58名患者在不到24小时内接受了计划中的最终手术稳定Lisfranc损伤,41名患者在超过24小时后接受了固定。与接受延迟固定治疗的患者相比,早期治疗 Lisfranc 损伤在随访时间、感染、负重时间、骨结合率或骨结合时间方面均无明显增加。早期干预组的表皮感染率较高,但未达到统计学意义。我们认为,我们的研究结果表明,延迟固定并不优于早期治疗 Lisfranc 损伤。证据等级:3级 治疗回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes of naviculocuneiform arthrodesis with and without adjunct arthrodesis. Concomitant osteochondral lesion of the talus in ankle instability: Utilizing clinical presentation to guide imaging decision. Diabetic Foot Infection Severity as a Predictor of Re-ulceration Following Partial Forefoot Amputation. Predictive factors to return to sport after surgical management of ankle fractures. Reply to: EVALUATION OF THE HEALING STATUS OF LATERAL ANKLE LIGAMENTS SIX WEEKS AFTER AN ACUTE ANKLE SPRAIN.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1