Comparison of different eye care methods to prevent dry eye and corneal ulcer in older critically ill patients: A three-arm randomised clinical trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.005
Mahsa Tebyanian, Ali Darvishpoor Kakhki, Sepehr Feizi
{"title":"Comparison of different eye care methods to prevent dry eye and corneal ulcer in older critically ill patients: A three-arm randomised clinical trial.","authors":"Mahsa Tebyanian, Ali Darvishpoor Kakhki, Sepehr Feizi","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the population ages, the number of older patient admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) will increase. This age group is at higher risk for developing eye problems because of higher prevalence of dry eye among older people. Inconsistency of early studies' results and less attention to eye care guidelines for older patients in the ICU pose severe consequences such as dry eye and corneal ulcer.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of artificial tear gel, polyethylene cover, and conventional eye care methods for preventing dry eye and corneal ulcer in older patients admitted to an ICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this three-arm randomised clinical trial, 99 older ICU patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores measuring <7 were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: (i) participants who received artificial tear gel in one eye and polyethylene cover on the other; (ii) these interventions were applied in the opposite eyes; and (iii) participants who received conventional eye care including antiallergic adhesive to closed eyelids. Development of dry eye and corneal ulcer was assessed based on Schirmer's and the fluorescein tests for 5 days. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to detect differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the participants was 70.91 (±9.47). No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups regarding baseline demographic and disease characteristics. While there was a nonsignificant difference between artificial tear gel and polyethylene cover in reducing dry eye and corneal ulcer, each of these methods could reduce dry eye and corneal ulcer significantly (P < 0.001) compared with conventional eye care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results revealed that artificial tear gel eye care and polyethylene cover methods were more effective in prevention of dry eye and corneal ulcer than antiallergic adhesive eye care. Nurses can choose an appropriate care method based on clinical conditions, costs, and care burden in older ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Iranian Clinical Trial Registry (IRCT20200711048079N1). The first recruitment was conducted in October 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.09.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the population ages, the number of older patient admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) will increase. This age group is at higher risk for developing eye problems because of higher prevalence of dry eye among older people. Inconsistency of early studies' results and less attention to eye care guidelines for older patients in the ICU pose severe consequences such as dry eye and corneal ulcer.

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of artificial tear gel, polyethylene cover, and conventional eye care methods for preventing dry eye and corneal ulcer in older patients admitted to an ICU.

Methods: In this three-arm randomised clinical trial, 99 older ICU patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores measuring <7 were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: (i) participants who received artificial tear gel in one eye and polyethylene cover on the other; (ii) these interventions were applied in the opposite eyes; and (iii) participants who received conventional eye care including antiallergic adhesive to closed eyelids. Development of dry eye and corneal ulcer was assessed based on Schirmer's and the fluorescein tests for 5 days. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to detect differences between groups.

Results: The mean age of the participants was 70.91 (±9.47). No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups regarding baseline demographic and disease characteristics. While there was a nonsignificant difference between artificial tear gel and polyethylene cover in reducing dry eye and corneal ulcer, each of these methods could reduce dry eye and corneal ulcer significantly (P < 0.001) compared with conventional eye care.

Conclusions: The results revealed that artificial tear gel eye care and polyethylene cover methods were more effective in prevention of dry eye and corneal ulcer than antiallergic adhesive eye care. Nurses can choose an appropriate care method based on clinical conditions, costs, and care burden in older ICU patients.

Registration: Iranian Clinical Trial Registry (IRCT20200711048079N1). The first recruitment was conducted in October 2021.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较不同的眼部护理方法以预防老年重症患者的干眼症和角膜溃疡:三臂随机临床试验。
背景:随着人口老龄化,入住重症监护病房(ICU)的老年患者人数将会增加。由于干眼症在老年人中的发病率较高,这一年龄段的人患眼疾的风险也较高。早期研究结果的不一致性以及对重症监护室老年患者眼部护理指南的关注度较低,都会造成干眼症和角膜溃疡等严重后果:本研究旨在探讨人工泪液凝胶、聚乙烯覆盖物和传统眼部护理方法对重症监护病房老年患者预防干眼症和角膜溃疡的效果:在这项三臂随机临床试验中,对 99 名格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的 ICU 老年患者进行了测量:参与者的平均年龄为 70.91 (±9.47)岁。在基线人口统计学特征和疾病特征方面,两组之间没有发现明显的统计学差异。虽然人工泪液凝胶和聚乙烯覆盖物在减少干眼症和角膜溃疡方面没有显著差异,但这两种方法都能显著减少干眼症和角膜溃疡(P 结论:人工泪液凝胶和聚乙烯覆盖物在减少干眼症和角膜溃疡方面没有显著差异,但这两种方法都能显著减少干眼症和角膜溃疡:结果显示,人工泪液凝胶眼部护理和聚乙烯覆盖法在预防干眼症和角膜溃疡方面比抗过敏粘合剂眼部护理更有效。护士可根据 ICU 老年患者的临床情况、成本和护理负担选择合适的护理方法:伊朗临床试验注册中心(IRCT20200711048079N1)。首次招募于 2021 年 10 月进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and risk factors associated within 48-hour unplanned paediatric intensive care unit readmissions: An integrative review. Comparison of Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score to assess the level of consciousness in patients admitted to intensive care units and emergency departments: A quantitative systematic review. Use of point-of-care ultrasound during cardiac arrest in the intensive care unit: A cross-sectional survey. The influence of anxiety and depression on critical care nurses' performance: A multicenter correlational study. Patients' and relatives' experiences of cognitive impairment following an intensive care unit admission. A qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1