Persistent ethnic disparities in authorship within top European and North American medical journals: a serial cross-sectional analysis

IF 7.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111552
Sarit Kang-Auger , U. Vivian Ukah , Jessica Healy-Profitós , Aimina Ayoub , Nathalie Auger
{"title":"Persistent ethnic disparities in authorship within top European and North American medical journals: a serial cross-sectional analysis","authors":"Sarit Kang-Auger ,&nbsp;U. Vivian Ukah ,&nbsp;Jessica Healy-Profitós ,&nbsp;Aimina Ayoub ,&nbsp;Nathalie Auger","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We examined the ethnic origin of authors who published research articles in leading medical journals over the past 2 decades.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design and Setting</h3><div>We carried out a serial cross-sectional analysis of first and last authors who published original research articles in the <em>British Medical Journal</em>, <em>Lancet</em>, <em>Journal of the American Medical Association</em>, and <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em> in 2002, 2012, and 2022. The main outcome was the change in proportion of authors over time according to ethnic origin (Anglo, North/West European, South/West European, Asian, Arab and Middle Eastern, African), gender (male, female), and institutional affiliation in percentage points.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most authors were of Anglo descent (44%), although the proportion of non-European authors grew between 2002 and 2022. East Asian, South Asian, and Arab and Middle Eastern last authors accounted for a greater proportion of authors over time, gaining between 3 and 6 percentage points, while African authors made no gains. Gains were gender-specific, with non-European men gaining 8 points as first and last authors, but non-European women gaining 5 points as last authors only. Most non-European authors were affiliated with North American (42.9%) or European (22.4%) institutions, while non-European authors from other institutions did not make meaningful gains over time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Ethnic diversity of authors in leading medical journals has increased somewhat over time, but non-European men account for most of the gains. Non-European women have yet to make comparable advancement as authors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 111552"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435624003081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

We examined the ethnic origin of authors who published research articles in leading medical journals over the past 2 decades.

Study Design and Setting

We carried out a serial cross-sectional analysis of first and last authors who published original research articles in the British Medical Journal, Lancet, Journal of the American Medical Association, and New England Journal of Medicine in 2002, 2012, and 2022. The main outcome was the change in proportion of authors over time according to ethnic origin (Anglo, North/West European, South/West European, Asian, Arab and Middle Eastern, African), gender (male, female), and institutional affiliation in percentage points.

Results

Most authors were of Anglo descent (44%), although the proportion of non-European authors grew between 2002 and 2022. East Asian, South Asian, and Arab and Middle Eastern last authors accounted for a greater proportion of authors over time, gaining between 3 and 6 percentage points, while African authors made no gains. Gains were gender-specific, with non-European men gaining 8 points as first and last authors, but non-European women gaining 5 points as last authors only. Most non-European authors were affiliated with North American (42.9%) or European (22.4%) institutions, while non-European authors from other institutions did not make meaningful gains over time.

Conclusion

Ethnic diversity of authors in leading medical journals has increased somewhat over time, but non-European men account for most of the gains. Non-European women have yet to make comparable advancement as authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲和北美顶级医学期刊作者中持续存在的种族差异:系列横截面分析。
研究目的我们研究了过去二十年中在主要医学期刊上发表研究文章的作者的种族来源:我们对 2002 年、2012 年和 2022 年在《英国医学杂志》、《柳叶刀》、《美国医学会杂志》和《新英格兰医学杂志》上发表原创研究文章的第一作者和最后作者进行了连续横断面分析。主要结果是作者比例随时间推移在种族(盎格鲁人、西北欧人、西南欧人、亚洲人、阿拉伯人和中东人、非洲人)、性别(男性、女性)和所属机构方面的变化(以百分点表示):大多数作者是盎格鲁后裔(44%),尽管非欧洲作者的比例在 2002 年至 2022 年期间有所增长。随着时间的推移,东亚、南亚以及阿拉伯和中东裔作者所占比例越来越大,增加了 3 到 6 个百分点,而非洲裔作者没有增加。增长是有性别区分的,非欧洲裔男性作为第一作者和最后作者增长了 8 个百分点,但非欧洲裔女性仅作为最后作者增长了 5 个百分点。大多数非欧洲裔作者隶属于北美(42.9%)或欧洲(22.4%)机构,而来自其他机构的非欧洲裔作者没有随时间推移取得有意义的进步:结论:随着时间的推移,主要医学期刊作者的种族多样性有所提高,但非欧洲裔男性占了大部分。结论:随着时间的推移,顶尖医学期刊作者的种族多样性有了一定程度的提高,但非欧洲裔男性的进步最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Epidemiology strives to enhance the quality of clinical and patient-oriented healthcare research by advancing and applying innovative methods in conducting, presenting, synthesizing, disseminating, and translating research results into optimal clinical practice. Special emphasis is placed on training new generations of scientists and clinical practice leaders.
期刊最新文献
Research culture influences in health and biomedical research: Rapid scoping review and content analysis. Corrigendum to 'Avoiding searching for outcomes called for additional search strategies: a study of cochrane review searches' [Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 149 (2022) 83-88]. A methodological review identified several options for utilizing registries for randomized controlled trials. Real-time Adaptive Randomization of Clinical Trials. Some superiority trials with non-significant results published in high impact factor journals correspond to non-inferiority situations: a research-on-research study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1