Peak expiratory flow predicts the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Diseases of the Esophagus Pub Date : 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1093/dote/doae084
Shota Sawai, Eiji Nakatani, Shinsuke Sato, Philip Hawke, Takuma Mochizuki, Masato Nishida, Hiroshi Ogiso, Masaya Watanabe
{"title":"Peak expiratory flow predicts the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.","authors":"Shota Sawai, Eiji Nakatani, Shinsuke Sato, Philip Hawke, Takuma Mochizuki, Masato Nishida, Hiroshi Ogiso, Masaya Watanabe","doi":"10.1093/dote/doae084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Expiratory flow is an important factor in the achievement of airway clearance that is required to prevent postoperative pneumonia (POP). Although peak expiratory flow (PEF) has been shown to predict the occurrence of POP in lung cancer patients after lobectomy, its predictive power in relation to esophagectomy for esophageal cancer remains unknown. This study assesses PEF as a predictor of POP in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radical esophagectomy. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent radical esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction at our institution between January 2007 and December 2022. Preoperative pulmonary functions, including PEF, were assessed before surgery. Additionally, POP was diagnosed as a Clavien-Dindo classification of Grade II or higher. Survival and pneumonia incidence were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between these variables and POP. The study included 513 patients, of which 441 were men. POP occurred in 86 patients (16.7%). When all patients were stratified by %PEF into two groups, the group with %PEF lower that 80% had significantly poorer prognosis and higher incidence of pneumonia. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that %PEF (OR: 0.986, 95%CI: 0.974-0.999, P = 0.030), along with age, BMI, preoperative treatment, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were independent protective factors against POP. These results reveal that %PEF predicts the development of POP following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doae084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Expiratory flow is an important factor in the achievement of airway clearance that is required to prevent postoperative pneumonia (POP). Although peak expiratory flow (PEF) has been shown to predict the occurrence of POP in lung cancer patients after lobectomy, its predictive power in relation to esophagectomy for esophageal cancer remains unknown. This study assesses PEF as a predictor of POP in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radical esophagectomy. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent radical esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction at our institution between January 2007 and December 2022. Preoperative pulmonary functions, including PEF, were assessed before surgery. Additionally, POP was diagnosed as a Clavien-Dindo classification of Grade II or higher. Survival and pneumonia incidence were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between these variables and POP. The study included 513 patients, of which 441 were men. POP occurred in 86 patients (16.7%). When all patients were stratified by %PEF into two groups, the group with %PEF lower that 80% had significantly poorer prognosis and higher incidence of pneumonia. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that %PEF (OR: 0.986, 95%CI: 0.974-0.999, P = 0.030), along with age, BMI, preoperative treatment, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy were independent protective factors against POP. These results reveal that %PEF predicts the development of POP following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
呼气流量峰值可预测食管癌食管切除术后肺炎的发生。
呼气流量是实现气道通畅的一个重要因素,而气道通畅是预防术后肺炎(POP)的必要条件。虽然呼气流量峰值(PEF)已被证明可以预测肺叶切除术后肺癌患者的 POP 发生率,但其对食管癌食管切除术的预测能力仍是未知数。本研究评估了 PEF 对接受根治性食管切除术的食管癌患者 POP 的预测作用。我们对 2007 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间在本院接受根治性食管切除术并进行胃管重建的患者进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。术前对肺功能(包括 PEF)进行了评估。此外,POP 的诊断标准为 Clavien-Dindo 分级为 II 级或以上。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法比较了存活率和肺炎发病率。Logistic 回归分析用于研究这些变量与 POP 之间的关系。研究共纳入了 513 名患者,其中 441 人为男性。有 86 名患者(16.7%)发生了 POP。将所有患者按 PEF 百分比分为两组,PEF 百分比低于 80% 的一组患者预后明显较差,肺炎发病率较高。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,PEF%(OR:0.986,95%CI:0.974-0.999,P = 0.030)与年龄、体重指数、术前治疗和喉返神经麻痹一起,是POP的独立保护因素。这些结果表明,PEF% 可预测食管癌食管切除术后 POP 的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
期刊最新文献
Eosinophilic esophagitis prevalence, incidence, and presenting features: a 22-year population-based observational study from southwest Sweden. Exploring X: barriers to care for eosinophilic esophagitis. Effect of benralizumab on histopathology and inflammatory signatures in a clinical cohort of eosinophilic esophagitis. Identification of gaps in the delivery of high-quality care of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Increased expression of proton pump and allergic inflammation genes predicts PPI failure in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1