{"title":"Healthcare professionals’ experiences of delivering pain science education to adults from ethnically minoritised groups","authors":"J. Pun , J. Franklin , C.G. Ryan","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pain Science Education (PSE) seeks to increase patients understanding of their pain, to improve clinical outcomes. It has been primarily developed and tested within western cultures. There is a lack of research exploring its use with people from ethnically minoritised groups.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) experiences of delivering PSE to people with persistent pain from ethnically minoritised groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this qualitative study semi-structured interviews were carried out with a convenience sample of 14 HCPs who routinely deliver PSE to patients from ethnically minoritised groups. The interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three themes were identified: 1) <em>Biomedical model or disengagement</em>, 2) <em>Pain is a taboo topic</em>, and 3) <em>The importance of cultural competence</em>. Participants believed that people from ethnically minoritised groups disengaged with PSE sooner in comparison to non-ethnically minoritised groups and this was rooted in a strong biomedical understanding of pain and preference for biomedical treatments. Addressing patients’ beliefs was deemed difficult as participants felt that pain was considered a taboo amongst some ethnically minoritised groups and HCPs lacked sufficient training in cultural competency to confidently address their pain-related misconceptions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Overall, HCPs found that many people from ethnically minoritised groups held strongly biomedical views and/or a cultural reluctance to discuss pain. These factors made pain discussions challenging leading to disengagement from PSE and a preference for passive care. Cultural competency training and access to culturally competent PSE resources may facilitate engagement with PSE for people from ethnically minoritised background.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 103196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468781224002911","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Pain Science Education (PSE) seeks to increase patients understanding of their pain, to improve clinical outcomes. It has been primarily developed and tested within western cultures. There is a lack of research exploring its use with people from ethnically minoritised groups.
Objective
To explore Healthcare Professionals (HCPs) experiences of delivering PSE to people with persistent pain from ethnically minoritised groups.
Methods
In this qualitative study semi-structured interviews were carried out with a convenience sample of 14 HCPs who routinely deliver PSE to patients from ethnically minoritised groups. The interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Results
Three themes were identified: 1) Biomedical model or disengagement, 2) Pain is a taboo topic, and 3) The importance of cultural competence. Participants believed that people from ethnically minoritised groups disengaged with PSE sooner in comparison to non-ethnically minoritised groups and this was rooted in a strong biomedical understanding of pain and preference for biomedical treatments. Addressing patients’ beliefs was deemed difficult as participants felt that pain was considered a taboo amongst some ethnically minoritised groups and HCPs lacked sufficient training in cultural competency to confidently address their pain-related misconceptions.
Conclusions
Overall, HCPs found that many people from ethnically minoritised groups held strongly biomedical views and/or a cultural reluctance to discuss pain. These factors made pain discussions challenging leading to disengagement from PSE and a preference for passive care. Cultural competency training and access to culturally competent PSE resources may facilitate engagement with PSE for people from ethnically minoritised background.
背景:疼痛科学教育(PSE)旨在提高患者对自身疼痛的认识,从而改善临床疗效。它主要是在西方文化中开发和测试的。目前还缺乏针对少数族裔群体的研究:探讨医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)向少数族裔群体中的持续性疼痛患者提供 PSE 的经验:在这项定性研究中,我们对 14 名经常为少数民族患者提供 PSE 的医护人员进行了半结构化访谈。采用反思性主题分析法对访谈进行分析:结果:确定了三个主题:1) 生物医学模式或脱离;2) 疼痛是一个禁忌话题;3) 文化能力的重要性。参与者认为,与非少数族裔群体相比,少数族裔群体更早脱离 PSE,其根源在于对疼痛的强烈生物医学理解和对生物医学治疗的偏好。由于参与者认为疼痛在一些少数族裔群体中被视为禁忌,而保健专业人员缺乏足够的文化能力培训,无法自信地消除患者与疼痛有关的误解,因此解决患者的观念问题被认为是困难的:总体而言,保健医生发现许多少数民族群体的人持有强烈的生物医学观点和/或在文化上不愿意讨论疼痛。这些因素使得疼痛讨论具有挑战性,导致他们不参与 PSE 并倾向于被动护理。文化胜任能力培训和获取具有文化胜任能力的 PSE 资源可促进少数族裔人群参与 PSE。
期刊介绍:
Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.