Scoring and validation of a simple model for predicting diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes based on a meta-analysis approach of 21 cohorts.
Hang Guo, Fei Han, Jing-Ru Qu, Cong-Qing Pan, Bei Sun, Li-Ming Chen
{"title":"Scoring and validation of a simple model for predicting diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes based on a meta-analysis approach of 21 cohorts.","authors":"Hang Guo, Fei Han, Jing-Ru Qu, Cong-Qing Pan, Bei Sun, Li-Ming Chen","doi":"10.1080/07853890.2024.2413920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop and validate a model for predicting diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All risk factors with statistical significance in the DR prediction model were scored by their weights. Model performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Kaplan-Meier curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis. The prediction model was externally validated using a validation cohort from a Chinese hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this meta-analysis, 21 cohorts involving 184,737 patients with type 2 diabetes were examined. Sex, smoking, diabetes mellitus (DM) duration, albuminuria, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and TG were identified to be statistically significant. Thus, they were all included in the model and scored according to their weights (maximum score: 35.0). The model was validated using an external cohort with median follow-up time of 32 months. At a critical value of 16.0, the AUC value, sensitivity and specificity of the validation cohort are 0.772 ((95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.740-0.803), <i>p</i> < .01), 0.715 and 0.775, respectively. The calibration curve lied close to the ideal diagonal line. Furthermore, the decision curve analysis demonstrated that the model had notably higher net benefits. The external validation results proved the reliability of the risk prediction model.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The simple DR prediction model developed has good overall calibration and discrimination performance. It can be used as a simple tool to detect patients at high risk of DR.</p>","PeriodicalId":93874,"journal":{"name":"Annals of medicine","volume":"56 1","pages":"2413920"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2413920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To develop and validate a model for predicting diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Methods: All risk factors with statistical significance in the DR prediction model were scored by their weights. Model performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Kaplan-Meier curve, calibration curve and decision curve analysis. The prediction model was externally validated using a validation cohort from a Chinese hospital.
Results: In this meta-analysis, 21 cohorts involving 184,737 patients with type 2 diabetes were examined. Sex, smoking, diabetes mellitus (DM) duration, albuminuria, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and TG were identified to be statistically significant. Thus, they were all included in the model and scored according to their weights (maximum score: 35.0). The model was validated using an external cohort with median follow-up time of 32 months. At a critical value of 16.0, the AUC value, sensitivity and specificity of the validation cohort are 0.772 ((95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.740-0.803), p < .01), 0.715 and 0.775, respectively. The calibration curve lied close to the ideal diagonal line. Furthermore, the decision curve analysis demonstrated that the model had notably higher net benefits. The external validation results proved the reliability of the risk prediction model.
Conclusions: The simple DR prediction model developed has good overall calibration and discrimination performance. It can be used as a simple tool to detect patients at high risk of DR.