A systematic review of recent randomized controlled trials for palmoplantar pustulosis.

Miranda K Branyiczky, Shahnawaz Towheed, Tiago Torres, Ronald Vender
{"title":"A systematic review of recent randomized controlled trials for palmoplantar pustulosis.","authors":"Miranda K Branyiczky, Shahnawaz Towheed, Tiago Torres, Ronald Vender","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2414048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory condition, that leads to significant functional impairment and reduced quality of life. Despite its low incidence, treatment options are diverse and often ineffective, necessitating a review of recent therapeutic advances.</p><p><p><b>Objective:</b> This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recent therapeutic options for the treatment of PPP, focusing on phototherapy, systemic therapies, and biologics.</p><p><p><b>Materials and methods:</b> A systematic literature search identified 13 studies evaluating phototherapy and systemic therapies, including biologics. Inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials with participants diagnosed with PPP.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Phototherapy showed success: excimer laser demonstrated high efficacy for severe disease [PPP Area and Severity Index (PPPASI)-75 of 95.0%], while psoralen plus ultraviolet A therapy with retinoids or fumaric acid esters worked well in milder disease (PPPASI-90 of 90.0 and 81.8%, respectively). Evidence supports the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, brodalumab, and apremilast over a range of disease severity (PPPASI-50 ranged from 57.4 to 78.3% at week 16). Agents including anakinra, secukinumab, spesolimab, and RIST4721 (primary outcomes not achieved) may not be first-line treatments. By targeting multiple inflammatory pathways in PPP, JAK inhibitors may be more effective than biologics in treating PPP; however, more research is needed to confirm their safety and appropriate use.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Multiple new treatments exist for PPP with promising results, however longer-term studies with standardized outcome reporting are needed to determine optimal treatment strategies and their comparative efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2414048"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2414048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory condition, that leads to significant functional impairment and reduced quality of life. Despite its low incidence, treatment options are diverse and often ineffective, necessitating a review of recent therapeutic advances.

Objective: This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recent therapeutic options for the treatment of PPP, focusing on phototherapy, systemic therapies, and biologics.

Materials and methods: A systematic literature search identified 13 studies evaluating phototherapy and systemic therapies, including biologics. Inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials with participants diagnosed with PPP.

Results: Phototherapy showed success: excimer laser demonstrated high efficacy for severe disease [PPP Area and Severity Index (PPPASI)-75 of 95.0%], while psoralen plus ultraviolet A therapy with retinoids or fumaric acid esters worked well in milder disease (PPPASI-90 of 90.0 and 81.8%, respectively). Evidence supports the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, brodalumab, and apremilast over a range of disease severity (PPPASI-50 ranged from 57.4 to 78.3% at week 16). Agents including anakinra, secukinumab, spesolimab, and RIST4721 (primary outcomes not achieved) may not be first-line treatments. By targeting multiple inflammatory pathways in PPP, JAK inhibitors may be more effective than biologics in treating PPP; however, more research is needed to confirm their safety and appropriate use.

Conclusions: Multiple new treatments exist for PPP with promising results, however longer-term studies with standardized outcome reporting are needed to determine optimal treatment strategies and their comparative efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近期针对掌跖脓疱病随机对照试验的系统回顾。
背景:掌跖脓疱病(PPP)是一种慢性炎症,会导致严重的功能障碍和生活质量下降。尽管其发病率较低,但治疗方案多种多样,而且往往效果不佳,因此有必要对近期的治疗进展进行综述:本综述旨在评估治疗 PPP 的最新治疗方案的有效性和安全性,重点关注光疗、系统疗法和生物制剂:通过系统性文献检索确定了 13 项评估光疗和全身疗法(包括生物制剂)的研究。纳入标准主要集中在以确诊为 PPP 患者为对象的随机对照试验:结果:光疗取得了成功:准分子激光对重症患者疗效显著[PPP面积和严重程度指数(PPPASI)-75为95.0%],而补骨脂素加紫外线A疗法配合维甲酸或富马酸酯对轻症患者疗效显著(PPPASI-90分别为90.0%和81.8%)。有证据支持古舍库单抗、布罗达鲁单抗和阿普瑞米拉特在不同病情严重程度下的疗效和安全性(第16周时的PPPASI-50从57.4%到78.3%不等)。anakinra、secukinumab、spesolimab和RIST4721(主要结果未达到)等药物可能不是一线治疗药物。通过靶向PPP中的多种炎症通路,JAK抑制剂在治疗PPP方面可能比生物制剂更有效;然而,还需要更多的研究来确认其安全性和适当的使用:结论:目前已有多种治疗 PPP 的新疗法,并取得了可喜的成果,但要确定最佳治疗策略及其疗效比较,还需要进行更长期的研究,并提供标准化的结果报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of sofpironium in treatment of primary hyperhidrosis: a systematic review. Efficacy and safety of 308-nm Excimer lamp combined with Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment vs Tacrolimus 0.1% ointment as monotherapy in treating children with limited vitiligo: a randomized controlled trial. The wide variety of methotrexate dosing regimens for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. Comparing Mohs micrographic surgery and wide local excision in the management of head and neck dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a scoping review. The primary role of sebum in the pathophysiology of acne vulgaris and its therapeutic relevance in acne management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1