Decision-making around removal of indwelling urinary catheters after pituitary surgery.

Jeanne-Marie Nollen, Anja H Brunsveld-Reinders, Wilco C Peul, Wouter R van Furth
{"title":"Decision-making around removal of indwelling urinary catheters after pituitary surgery.","authors":"Jeanne-Marie Nollen, Anja H Brunsveld-Reinders, Wilco C Peul, Wouter R van Furth","doi":"10.12968/bjon.2024.0182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes insipidus (DI) is a common complication following pituitary surgery, causing significant health issues if left untreated. As part of the diagnostic process, accurate urinary output monitoring via indwelling urinary catheters (IDUCs) is essential, despite risks such as urinary tract infections and hindered recovery. Research on IDUC removal after pituitary surgery remains scarce.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore health professionals' perspectives on IDUC management following pituitary surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Employing a qualitative design, semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 professionals in the neurosurgical ward of a Dutch academic hospital.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Four themes emerged: Concerns about missing identifying DI, patient-nurse dynamics, workload management, and lack of shared decision making.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings underscore the need to balance clinical needs with patient care efficiency. There is a need for evidence-based guidelines and a multidisciplinary approach to optimise IDUC management, given the importance of patient-centred care and shared decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":520014,"journal":{"name":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","volume":"33 18","pages":"S4-S12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2024.0182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetes insipidus (DI) is a common complication following pituitary surgery, causing significant health issues if left untreated. As part of the diagnostic process, accurate urinary output monitoring via indwelling urinary catheters (IDUCs) is essential, despite risks such as urinary tract infections and hindered recovery. Research on IDUC removal after pituitary surgery remains scarce.

Aim: To explore health professionals' perspectives on IDUC management following pituitary surgery.

Methods: Employing a qualitative design, semistructured interviews were conducted with 15 professionals in the neurosurgical ward of a Dutch academic hospital.

Findings: Four themes emerged: Concerns about missing identifying DI, patient-nurse dynamics, workload management, and lack of shared decision making.

Conclusion: The findings underscore the need to balance clinical needs with patient care efficiency. There is a need for evidence-based guidelines and a multidisciplinary approach to optimise IDUC management, given the importance of patient-centred care and shared decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
垂体手术后移除留置导尿管的决策。
背景:糖尿病性尿崩症(DI)是垂体手术后常见的并发症,如果不及时治疗会对健康造成严重影响。作为诊断过程的一部分,通过留置导尿管(IDUC)进行准确的尿量监测至关重要,尽管存在尿路感染和恢复受阻等风险。有关垂体手术后拔除留置导尿管的研究仍然很少。目的:探讨医护人员对垂体手术后留置导尿管管理的看法:方法:采用定性设计,对荷兰一家学术医院神经外科病房的 15 名专业人员进行了半结构化访谈:结果:出现了四个主题:结果:出现了四个主题:对遗漏识别DI、病人-护士动态关系、工作量管理和缺乏共同决策的担忧:结论:研究结果强调了平衡临床需求与患者护理效率的必要性。鉴于以患者为中心的护理和共同决策的重要性,有必要制定循证指南和多学科方法,以优化 IDUC 管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Big changes to the NHS patient safety landscape expected in 2025. Engaging and inspiring the next generation. Enhancing patient outcomes through proactive stoma care. Ensuring future-proofing through collaboration. Essential principles to apply when approaching a new job.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1