Comprehensive analysis of strabismus reoperations: clinical insights and progression factors.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMC Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1186/s12886-024-03712-2
Rui Niu, Panpan Lv, Rui Hao, Wei Zhang
{"title":"Comprehensive analysis of strabismus reoperations: clinical insights and progression factors.","authors":"Rui Niu, Panpan Lv, Rui Hao, Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12886-024-03712-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare and analyze clinical characteristics of patients undergoing two surgeries and multiple surgeries and explore relevant factors to lay the foundation for clinical prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from all patients who underwent twice and multiple strabismus surgeries at Tianjin Eye Hospital between October 2012 and September 2021. Patients were divided into Group A (two surgeries) and Group B (more than two surgeries) based on the cumulative number of surgeries performed. Clinical details at the first recurrence, including sex, age, native place, overall medical history, onset time, visual acuity, affected muscle(s), etc., were documented. Non-parametric tests and chi-square tests were used to analyze clinical characteristics in each group. Binary and ordered logistic regression analysis assessed parameters associated with multiple reoperations. A linear mixed-term model observed factors impacting affected muscle(s) during surgery. Researchers examined clinical traits related to secondary strabismus variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 910 included patients, 840 required two surgeries (Group A) and 70 underwent more than two surgeries (Group B). Significant differences were found in age, onset time, interval time, and secondary factors. Regression analysis highlighted the significant impact of interval time on the reoperation rate, effectively predicting outcomes in patients with concomitant strabismus. Other ophthalmoplegia and secondary factors significantly influenced reoperation rates in patients with non-concomitant strabismus. Interval time, esotropia, and exotropia were linked to concomitant secondary strabismus patients, while the number of surgeries, DVD, esotropia, exotropia, and esotropia V-pattern were associated with non-concomitant secondary strabismus patients. In a longitudinal study, patients with multiple surgeries showed a correlation between the vertical deviation angle magnitude and the number of involved extraocular muscles. Regression analysis revealed that in patients with concomitant strabismus, interval time, exotropia, and esotropia influenced the total number of muscles during surgery. For patients with non-concomitant strabismus, interval time, secondary factors, and SOP impacted the total number of muscles during surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interval time in patients with concomitant strabismus, as well as secondary and other ophthalmoplegia in non-concomitant strabismus, are the main factors for multiple reoperations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"24 1","pages":"446"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11468484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03712-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To compare and analyze clinical characteristics of patients undergoing two surgeries and multiple surgeries and explore relevant factors to lay the foundation for clinical prediction.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from all patients who underwent twice and multiple strabismus surgeries at Tianjin Eye Hospital between October 2012 and September 2021. Patients were divided into Group A (two surgeries) and Group B (more than two surgeries) based on the cumulative number of surgeries performed. Clinical details at the first recurrence, including sex, age, native place, overall medical history, onset time, visual acuity, affected muscle(s), etc., were documented. Non-parametric tests and chi-square tests were used to analyze clinical characteristics in each group. Binary and ordered logistic regression analysis assessed parameters associated with multiple reoperations. A linear mixed-term model observed factors impacting affected muscle(s) during surgery. Researchers examined clinical traits related to secondary strabismus variables.

Results: Among the 910 included patients, 840 required two surgeries (Group A) and 70 underwent more than two surgeries (Group B). Significant differences were found in age, onset time, interval time, and secondary factors. Regression analysis highlighted the significant impact of interval time on the reoperation rate, effectively predicting outcomes in patients with concomitant strabismus. Other ophthalmoplegia and secondary factors significantly influenced reoperation rates in patients with non-concomitant strabismus. Interval time, esotropia, and exotropia were linked to concomitant secondary strabismus patients, while the number of surgeries, DVD, esotropia, exotropia, and esotropia V-pattern were associated with non-concomitant secondary strabismus patients. In a longitudinal study, patients with multiple surgeries showed a correlation between the vertical deviation angle magnitude and the number of involved extraocular muscles. Regression analysis revealed that in patients with concomitant strabismus, interval time, exotropia, and esotropia influenced the total number of muscles during surgery. For patients with non-concomitant strabismus, interval time, secondary factors, and SOP impacted the total number of muscles during surgery.

Conclusions: Interval time in patients with concomitant strabismus, as well as secondary and other ophthalmoplegia in non-concomitant strabismus, are the main factors for multiple reoperations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斜视再手术综合分析:临床见解和进展因素。
背景:对比分析接受两次手术和多次手术患者的临床特征,探讨相关因素,为临床预测奠定基础:比较分析两次手术和多次手术患者的临床特征,探讨相关因素,为临床预测奠定基础:对 2012 年 10 月至 2021 年 9 月期间在天津眼科医院接受两次和多次斜视手术的所有患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。根据累计手术次数将患者分为A组(两次手术)和B组(两次以上手术)。记录首次复发时的临床细节,包括性别、年龄、籍贯、整体病史、发病时间、视力、受累肌肉等。采用非参数检验和卡方检验分析各组的临床特征。二元和有序逻辑回归分析评估了与多次再手术相关的参数。线性混合期模型观察了手术中影响受影响肌肉的因素。研究人员检查了与继发性斜视变量相关的临床特征:在纳入的 910 名患者中,840 人需要接受两次手术(A 组),70 人接受了两次以上的手术(B 组)。年龄、发病时间、间隔时间和次要因素存在显著差异。回归分析凸显了间隔时间对再次手术率的重要影响,可有效预测合并斜视患者的预后。其他眼肌麻痹和次要因素对非并发斜视患者的再手术率有显著影响。间隔时间、内斜视和外斜视与合并继发性斜视患者有关,而手术次数、DVD、内斜视、外斜视和内斜视V型与非合并继发性斜视患者有关。在一项纵向研究中,多次手术患者的垂直偏斜角幅度与受累眼外肌的数量之间存在相关性。回归分析表明,在合并斜视患者中,间隔时间、外斜视和内斜视影响着手术中肌肉的总数。对于非并发斜视患者,间隔时间、次要因素和 SOP 会影响手术中肌肉的总数量:结论:并发斜视患者的间隔时间以及非并发斜视患者的继发性和其他眼肌麻痹是导致多次再手术的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Clinical features in patients with acquired intermittent and constant exotropia who underwent surgery. Daily activities change is linked to acute angle closure occurrence in COVID-19 co-infected patients. Elucidating postoperative dynamics in tractional retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of structural and functional outcomes following diabetic vitrectomy, including an analysis of postoperative complications. Risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in young and middle-aged patients: a retrospective study. Analysis of uric acid and high-density lipoprotein levels in refractory posner-schlossman syndrome patients: a matched case-control study by the propensity score.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1