Human dorsal root ganglia are either preserved or completely lost after deafferentation by brachial plexus injury.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY British journal of anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.004
Annemarie Sodmann, Johannes Degenbeck, Annemarie Aue, Magnus Schindehütte, Felicitas Schlott, Panagiota Arampatzi, Thorsten Bischler, Max Schneider, Alexander Brack, Camelia M Monoranu, Tom Gräfenhan, Michael Bohnert, Mirko Pham, Gregor Antoniadis, Robert Blum, Heike L Rittner
{"title":"Human dorsal root ganglia are either preserved or completely lost after deafferentation by brachial plexus injury.","authors":"Annemarie Sodmann, Johannes Degenbeck, Annemarie Aue, Magnus Schindehütte, Felicitas Schlott, Panagiota Arampatzi, Thorsten Bischler, Max Schneider, Alexander Brack, Camelia M Monoranu, Tom Gräfenhan, Michael Bohnert, Mirko Pham, Gregor Antoniadis, Robert Blum, Heike L Rittner","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plexus injury results in lifelong suffering from flaccid paralysis, sensory loss, and intractable pain. For this clinical problem, regenerative medicine concepts set high expectations. However, it is largely unknown how dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are affected by accidental deafferentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Here, we phenotyped DRG of a clinically and MRI-characterised cohort of 13 patients with plexus injury. Avulsed DRG were collected during reconstructive nerve surgery. For control, we used DRG from forensic autopsy. The cellular composition of the DRG was analysed in histopathological slices with multicolour high-resolution immunohistochemistry, tile microscopy, and deep-learning-based bioimage analysis. We then sequenced the bulk RNA of corresponding DRG slices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In about half of the patients we found loss of the typical DRG units consisting of neurones and satellite glial cells. The DRG cells were replaced by mesodermal/connective tissue. In the remaining patients, the cellular units were well preserved. Preoperative plexus MRI neurography was not able to distinguish the two types. Patients with 'neuronal preservation' had less maximum pain than patients with 'neuronal loss'. Arm function improved after nerve reconstruction, but severe pain persisted. Transcriptome analysis of preserved DRGs revealed expression of subtype-specific sensory neurone marker genes, but downregulation of neuronal attributes. Furthermore, they showed signs of ongoing inflammation and connective tissue remodelling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with plexus injury separate into two groups with either neuronal preservation or neuronal loss. The former could benefit from anti-inflammatory therapy. For the latter, studies should explore mechanisms of neuronal loss especially for regenerative approaches.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>DRKS00017266.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Plexus injury results in lifelong suffering from flaccid paralysis, sensory loss, and intractable pain. For this clinical problem, regenerative medicine concepts set high expectations. However, it is largely unknown how dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are affected by accidental deafferentation.

Methods: Here, we phenotyped DRG of a clinically and MRI-characterised cohort of 13 patients with plexus injury. Avulsed DRG were collected during reconstructive nerve surgery. For control, we used DRG from forensic autopsy. The cellular composition of the DRG was analysed in histopathological slices with multicolour high-resolution immunohistochemistry, tile microscopy, and deep-learning-based bioimage analysis. We then sequenced the bulk RNA of corresponding DRG slices.

Results: In about half of the patients we found loss of the typical DRG units consisting of neurones and satellite glial cells. The DRG cells were replaced by mesodermal/connective tissue. In the remaining patients, the cellular units were well preserved. Preoperative plexus MRI neurography was not able to distinguish the two types. Patients with 'neuronal preservation' had less maximum pain than patients with 'neuronal loss'. Arm function improved after nerve reconstruction, but severe pain persisted. Transcriptome analysis of preserved DRGs revealed expression of subtype-specific sensory neurone marker genes, but downregulation of neuronal attributes. Furthermore, they showed signs of ongoing inflammation and connective tissue remodelling.

Conclusions: Patients with plexus injury separate into two groups with either neuronal preservation or neuronal loss. The former could benefit from anti-inflammatory therapy. For the latter, studies should explore mechanisms of neuronal loss especially for regenerative approaches.

Clinical trial registration: DRKS00017266.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类背根神经节因臂丛神经损伤而失去传导功能后,要么得以保留,要么完全丧失。
背景:神经丛损伤会导致患者终生遭受弛缓性瘫痪、感觉缺失和顽固性疼痛的折磨。针对这一临床问题,再生医学概念被寄予厚望。方法:在此,我们对 13 名神经丛损伤患者的背根神经节(DRG)进行了临床和 MRI 特征表型。在神经重建手术中收集了脱落的神经丛。作为对照,我们使用了法医尸检中的 DRG。我们通过多色高分辨率免疫组化、瓦片显微镜和基于深度学习的生物图像分析,对组织病理学切片中的 DRG 细胞组成进行了分析。然后,我们对相应 DRG 切片的大量 RNA 进行了测序:在大约一半的患者中,我们发现由神经元和卫星神经胶质细胞组成的典型 DRG 单元消失了。DRG细胞被中胚层/结缔组织取代。其余患者的细胞单位保存完好。术前神经丛核磁共振神经影像学检查无法区分这两种类型。神经元保留 "患者的最大疼痛程度低于 "神经元缺失 "患者。神经重建后手臂功能有所改善,但剧烈疼痛依然存在。对保留神经元的转录组分析表明,亚型特异性感觉神经元标记基因有表达,但神经元属性下调。此外,它们还显示出持续炎症和结缔组织重塑的迹象:结论:神经丛损伤患者分为神经元保留或神经元缺失两组。前者可从抗炎治疗中获益。对于后者,研究应探索神经元丢失的机制,尤其是再生方法:DRKS00017266.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
期刊最新文献
A resuscitation tool for major obstetric haemorrhage: a nomogram that expresses quantitative blood loss relative to effective circulating blood volume. Balanced electrolyte solution with 1% glucose as intraoperative maintenance fluid in infants: a prospective study of glucose, electrolyte, and acid-base homeostasis. It is time to take a broader equity lens to highlight health inequalities in people with pain. The role of wearable technology in home-based prehabilitation: a scoping review. Corrigendum to "Effect of prolonged sedation with dexmedetomidine, midazolam, propofol, and sevoflurane on sleep homeostasis in rats" [Br J Anaesth 132 (2024) 1248-1259].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1