The HYsteroscopic Miscarriage MaNagement (HYMMN) pilot randomized-controlled trial

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.010
Prathiba M. De Silva , Oonagh Pickering , Natalie Woodhead , B. Zeyah F. Sairally , Siobhan O’Connor , Paul P. Smith , Arri Coomarasamy , T. Justin Clark
{"title":"The HYsteroscopic Miscarriage MaNagement (HYMMN) pilot randomized-controlled trial","authors":"Prathiba M. De Silva ,&nbsp;Oonagh Pickering ,&nbsp;Natalie Woodhead ,&nbsp;B. Zeyah F. Sairally ,&nbsp;Siobhan O’Connor ,&nbsp;Paul P. Smith ,&nbsp;Arri Coomarasamy ,&nbsp;T. Justin Clark","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the feasibility of performing a full-scale, adequately powered, multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effectiveness of office hysteroscopy (OH) for the treatment of retained pregnancy tissue (RPT) after miscarriage, compared with standard treatment (ST) (expectant/medical/surgical), on future pregnancy outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Single-center pilot RCT performed at Birmingham Women’s Hospital, UK. Patients opting for non-surgical miscarriage management at ≤14 weeks gestation who wanted to conceive as soon as possible were recruited and offered a transvaginal ultrasound scan (TVUS) eight weeks later to check for the presence of RPT. Patients with RPT were randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated online random allocation sequence to either OH (performed using the TruClear 5.0 hysteroscopic tissue retrieval system) or ST (the type of which was recommended based on symptoms, urinary pregnancy test and scan findings).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>158 participants were approached for inclusion into the trial, of which 149 (94.3%) agreed. Of the 126 that underwent TVUS, RPT were diagnosed in 42 patients (33.3%). 21 patients were randomized to OH, of whom 18 underwent the procedure because three fell pregnant after their TVUS. OH was deemed acceptable to all patients without any serious complications. 21 patients were randomized to ST where 16 patients (76%) were recommended expectant management and five (24%) were recommended surgical management. 115 patients (91%) were able to provide pregnancy data, however, the study was not powered to show a clinically significant difference.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A full-scale, adequately powered, randomized clinical trial investigating OH against ST for the treatment of RPT following miscarriage is clinically relevant and feasible owing to high rates of participation, acceptability and satisfaction and low rates of attrition associated with the proposed interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"302 ","pages":"Pages 375-380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524005487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility of performing a full-scale, adequately powered, multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessing the effectiveness of office hysteroscopy (OH) for the treatment of retained pregnancy tissue (RPT) after miscarriage, compared with standard treatment (ST) (expectant/medical/surgical), on future pregnancy outcome.

Study design

Single-center pilot RCT performed at Birmingham Women’s Hospital, UK. Patients opting for non-surgical miscarriage management at ≤14 weeks gestation who wanted to conceive as soon as possible were recruited and offered a transvaginal ultrasound scan (TVUS) eight weeks later to check for the presence of RPT. Patients with RPT were randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated online random allocation sequence to either OH (performed using the TruClear 5.0 hysteroscopic tissue retrieval system) or ST (the type of which was recommended based on symptoms, urinary pregnancy test and scan findings).

Results

158 participants were approached for inclusion into the trial, of which 149 (94.3%) agreed. Of the 126 that underwent TVUS, RPT were diagnosed in 42 patients (33.3%). 21 patients were randomized to OH, of whom 18 underwent the procedure because three fell pregnant after their TVUS. OH was deemed acceptable to all patients without any serious complications. 21 patients were randomized to ST where 16 patients (76%) were recommended expectant management and five (24%) were recommended surgical management. 115 patients (91%) were able to provide pregnancy data, however, the study was not powered to show a clinically significant difference.

Conclusion

A full-scale, adequately powered, randomized clinical trial investigating OH against ST for the treatment of RPT following miscarriage is clinically relevant and feasible owing to high rates of participation, acceptability and satisfaction and low rates of attrition associated with the proposed interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫腔镜流产管理(HYMMN)随机对照试验。
目的评估开展一项大规模、有充分证据支持的多中心随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性,以评估诊室宫腔镜(OH)与标准治疗(ST)(预期/药物/手术)相比,在治疗流产后妊娠组织残留(RPT)方面对未来妊娠结果的有效性:研究设计:在英国伯明翰妇女医院进行的单中心试验性 RCT。研究招募了妊娠≤14周时选择非手术流产治疗并希望尽快怀孕的患者,并在8周后为其提供经阴道超声波扫描(TVUS),以检查是否存在RPT。通过计算机生成的在线随机分配序列,RPT 患者以 1:1 的比例被随机分配到 OH(使用 TruClear 5.0 宫腔镜组织取出系统进行)或 ST(根据症状、尿妊娠试验和扫描结果推荐类型):试验共接触了 158 名参与者,其中 149 人(94.3%)表示同意。在接受 TVUS 检查的 126 名患者中,42 名患者(33.3%)被诊断为 RPT。21 名患者被随机分配接受 OH 治疗,其中 18 人接受了手术,因为有 3 人在 TVUS 后怀孕。所有患者均可接受 OH,且无任何严重并发症。21 名患者随机接受 ST 治疗,其中 16 名患者(76%)被建议接受期待治疗,5 名患者(24%)被建议接受手术治疗。115名患者(91%)能够提供妊娠数据,然而,该研究并不具备显示临床显著差异的能力:由于参与率高、可接受性高、满意度高以及与拟议干预措施相关的自然减员率低,因此一项全面的、有充分证据支持的随机临床试验具有临床相关性和可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Mode of delivery predicts postpartum maternal leukocyte telomere length" [Eur. J. Obstetr. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 300 (2024) 224-229]. Corrigendum to “Recombinant-Luteinzing hormone supplementation in women during IVF/ICSI cycles with GnRH-antagonist protocol: A systematic review and meta-analysis” [Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 283 (2023) 43–48] Comparative study on the effects of combined oral contraceptives and dienogest in women with endometriosis‑associated chronic pelvic pain Severe uterine haemorrhagic complications from gestational trophoblastic neoplasia Prediction of perinatal mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: A post hoc analysis of the Dutch STRIDER trial to predict perinatal mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1