Guiding induction chemotherapy of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma with ternary classification of predicted individual treatment effect

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Radiotherapy and Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110571
Zhiying Liang , Chao Luo , Shuqi Li , Yuliang Zhu , Wenjie Huang , Di Cao , Yifei Liu , Guangying Ruan , Shaobo Liang , Xi Chen , Kit-Ian Kou , Guoyi Zhang , Lizhi Liu , Haojiang Li
{"title":"Guiding induction chemotherapy of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma with ternary classification of predicted individual treatment effect","authors":"Zhiying Liang ,&nbsp;Chao Luo ,&nbsp;Shuqi Li ,&nbsp;Yuliang Zhu ,&nbsp;Wenjie Huang ,&nbsp;Di Cao ,&nbsp;Yifei Liu ,&nbsp;Guangying Ruan ,&nbsp;Shaobo Liang ,&nbsp;Xi Chen ,&nbsp;Kit-Ian Kou ,&nbsp;Guoyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Lizhi Liu ,&nbsp;Haojiang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Induction chemotherapy (IC) before concurrent chemoradiotherapy does not universally improve long-term overall survival (OS) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). Conventional risk stratification often yields suboptimal IC decisions. Our study introduces a ternary classification of predicted individual treatment effect (PITE) to guide personalized IC decisions.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A two-center retrospective analysis of 1,213 patients with LANPC was conducted to develop and validate prognostic models integrating magnetic resonance imaging and clinical data to estimate individual 5-year OS probabilities for IC and non-IC treatments. Differences in these probabilities defined PITE, facilitating patient stratification into three IC recommendation categories. Model effectiveness was validated using Kaplan–Meier estimators, decision curve-like analysis, and evaluations of variable importance and distribution.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The models exhibited strong predictive performance in both treatments across training and cross-validation sets, enabling accurate PITE calculations and patient classification. Compared with non-IC treatment, IC markedly improved OS in the IC-preferred group (HR = 0.62, p = 0.02), had no effect in the IC-neutral group (HR = 1.00, p = 0.70), and worsened OS in the IC-opposed group (HR = 2.00, p = 0.03). The ternary PITE classification effectively identified 41.7 % of high-risk patients not benefiting from IC, and yielded a 2.68 % higher mean 5-year OS probability over risk-based decisions. Significantly increasing distributions of key prognostic indicators, such as metastatic lymph node number and plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA level from IC-opposed to IC-preferred groups, further validated the clinical relevance of PITE classification.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The ternary PITE classification offers an accurate and clinically advantageous approach to guide personalized IC decision-making in patients with LANPC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21041,"journal":{"name":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 110571"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiotherapy and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167814024035497","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Induction chemotherapy (IC) before concurrent chemoradiotherapy does not universally improve long-term overall survival (OS) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). Conventional risk stratification often yields suboptimal IC decisions. Our study introduces a ternary classification of predicted individual treatment effect (PITE) to guide personalized IC decisions.

Materials and methods

A two-center retrospective analysis of 1,213 patients with LANPC was conducted to develop and validate prognostic models integrating magnetic resonance imaging and clinical data to estimate individual 5-year OS probabilities for IC and non-IC treatments. Differences in these probabilities defined PITE, facilitating patient stratification into three IC recommendation categories. Model effectiveness was validated using Kaplan–Meier estimators, decision curve-like analysis, and evaluations of variable importance and distribution.

Results

The models exhibited strong predictive performance in both treatments across training and cross-validation sets, enabling accurate PITE calculations and patient classification. Compared with non-IC treatment, IC markedly improved OS in the IC-preferred group (HR = 0.62, p = 0.02), had no effect in the IC-neutral group (HR = 1.00, p = 0.70), and worsened OS in the IC-opposed group (HR = 2.00, p = 0.03). The ternary PITE classification effectively identified 41.7 % of high-risk patients not benefiting from IC, and yielded a 2.68 % higher mean 5-year OS probability over risk-based decisions. Significantly increasing distributions of key prognostic indicators, such as metastatic lymph node number and plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA level from IC-opposed to IC-preferred groups, further validated the clinical relevance of PITE classification.

Conclusion

The ternary PITE classification offers an accurate and clinically advantageous approach to guide personalized IC decision-making in patients with LANPC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用三元分类法预测个体疗效,指导局部晚期鼻咽癌的诱导化疗。
背景和目的:对于局部区域性晚期鼻咽癌(LANPC),在同时进行化放疗之前先进行诱导化疗(IC)并不能普遍提高长期总生存率(OS)。传统的风险分层通常会产生次优化疗决策。我们的研究引入了预测个体治疗效果(PITE)的三元分类法,以指导个性化的IC决策:我们在两个中心对 1,213 名 LANPC 患者进行了回顾性分析,开发并验证了整合磁共振成像和临床数据的预后模型,以估计 IC 和非 IC 治疗的个体 5 年 OS 概率。这些概率的差异定义了 PITE,有助于将患者分为三个 IC 推荐类别。使用 Kaplan-Meier 估计器、决策曲线分析以及变量重要性和分布评估验证了模型的有效性:结果:在训练集和交叉验证集上,模型对两种治疗方法都表现出很强的预测能力,能够准确计算 PITE 和对患者进行分类。与非 IC 治疗相比,IC 首选组的 OS 明显改善(HR = 0.62,p = 0.02),IC 中立组无影响(HR = 1.00,p = 0.70),而 IC 反对组的 OS 则恶化(HR = 2.00,p = 0.03)。PITE 三元分类法能有效识别出 41.7% 的高危患者无法从 IC 中获益,其 5 年平均 OS 概率比基于风险的决策高出 2.68%。关键预后指标(如转移性淋巴结数量和血浆 Epstein-Barr 病毒 DNA 水平)的分布明显增加,进一步验证了 PITE 分类的临床相关性:结论:三元 PITE 分类为指导 LANPC 患者的个性化 IC 决策提供了一种准确且具有临床优势的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiotherapy and Oncology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
2445
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Radiotherapy and Oncology publishes papers describing original research as well as review articles. It covers areas of interest relating to radiation oncology. This includes: clinical radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, translational studies, epidemiological outcomes, imaging, dosimetry, and radiation therapy planning, experimental work in radiobiology, chemobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as data science in radiation oncology and physics aspects relevant to oncology.Papers on more general aspects of interest to the radiation oncologist including chemotherapy, surgery and immunology are also published.
期刊最新文献
Dosimetric impact of sparing base of heart on organ at risk doses during lung radiotherapy Evaluating and reporting LET and RBE-weighted dose in proton therapy for glioma – The Dutch approach A critical reflection of radiotherapy on osseous free flaps in mandibular segmental resection and immediate reconstruction in locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma: A cohort study Prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies Deep learning-based multiple-CT optimization: An adaptive treatment planning approach to account for anatomical changes in intensity-modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1