“Dengue fever is not just urban or rural: Reframing its spatial categorization.”

Abstract

Infectious diseases exploit niches that are often spatially defined as urban and/or rural. Yet spatial research on infectious diseases often fails to define “urban” and “rural” and how these contexts might influence their epidemiology. We use dengue fever, thought to be mostly an urban disease with rural foci, as a device to explore local definitions of urban and rural spaces and the impact of these spaces on dengue risk in the provinfine urban and rural locales. Interviews conducted from 2019 to 2021 with 71 residents and 23 health personce of Esmeraldas, Ecuador. Ecuador, like many countries, only uses population size and administrative function to denel found that they identified the availability of basic services, extent of their control over their environment, and presence of underbrush and weeds (known in Ecuador as monte and maleza and conceptualized in this paper as natural disorder) as important links to their conceptions of space and dengue risk. This broader conceptualization of space articulated by local residents and professionals reflects a more sophisticated approach to characterizing dengue risk than using categories of urban and rural employed by the national census and government. Rather than this dichotomous category of space, dengue fever can be better framed for health interventions in terms of specific environmental features and assemblages of high-risk spaces. An understanding of how community members perceive risk enhances our ability to collaborate with them to develop optimal mitigation strategies.