Hypofractionated versus standard fractionation radiotherapy for merkel cell carcinoma.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1186/s13014-024-02516-4
Lorein Gonzalez, Muni Rubens, Sreenija Yarlagadda, Guilherme Rabinowits, Noah S Kalman
{"title":"Hypofractionated versus standard fractionation radiotherapy for merkel cell carcinoma.","authors":"Lorein Gonzalez, Muni Rubens, Sreenija Yarlagadda, Guilherme Rabinowits, Noah S Kalman","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02516-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective(s): </strong>Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) radiation treatment has historically consisted of standard 1.8-2 Gy fractions treated daily over 4-6 weeks. Hypofractionated treatment regimens have demonstrated tumor control and toxicity equivalence to standard fractionation regimens for common cutaneous malignancies such as basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas. Herein we report the outcomes of hypofractionated versus standard fractionation radiotherapy for MCC at our institution.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>The study involved a retrospective review of MCC patients treated with radiotherapy. Treatment characteristics and patient outcomes, including acute toxicities, disease recurrence and survival data were collected. The cumulative incidence of local and distant failures was estimated, with death as a competing risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29 treatment courses for 24 patients were included, of which 13 involved standard fractionation with curative intent, 10 involved hypofractionated radiotherapy with curative intent, and 6 involved single fraction (8 Gy) palliative radiation. Half the patients were treated to a head/neck site. A subset of patients treated adjuvantly with curative intent included 8 standard fractionation and 8 hypofractionated radiotherapy patients. No statistically significant differences in local and/or distant failure or overall survival was observed between the patient groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hypofractionated radiotherapy for MCC was associated with similar treatment outcomes relative to standard fractionation. In our limited patient sample, hypofractionated radiation treatment achieved similar results with similar toxicity and fewer treatments. Further analysis of a larger patient population with longer follow up is needed to confirm treatment tolerability and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11468079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02516-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/objective(s): Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) radiation treatment has historically consisted of standard 1.8-2 Gy fractions treated daily over 4-6 weeks. Hypofractionated treatment regimens have demonstrated tumor control and toxicity equivalence to standard fractionation regimens for common cutaneous malignancies such as basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas. Herein we report the outcomes of hypofractionated versus standard fractionation radiotherapy for MCC at our institution.

Materials/methods: The study involved a retrospective review of MCC patients treated with radiotherapy. Treatment characteristics and patient outcomes, including acute toxicities, disease recurrence and survival data were collected. The cumulative incidence of local and distant failures was estimated, with death as a competing risk.

Results: A total of 29 treatment courses for 24 patients were included, of which 13 involved standard fractionation with curative intent, 10 involved hypofractionated radiotherapy with curative intent, and 6 involved single fraction (8 Gy) palliative radiation. Half the patients were treated to a head/neck site. A subset of patients treated adjuvantly with curative intent included 8 standard fractionation and 8 hypofractionated radiotherapy patients. No statistically significant differences in local and/or distant failure or overall survival was observed between the patient groups.

Conclusion: Hypofractionated radiotherapy for MCC was associated with similar treatment outcomes relative to standard fractionation. In our limited patient sample, hypofractionated radiation treatment achieved similar results with similar toxicity and fewer treatments. Further analysis of a larger patient population with longer follow up is needed to confirm treatment tolerability and efficacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
梅克尔细胞癌的低分次放疗与标准分次放疗对比。
目的/目标:梅克尔细胞癌(MCC)的放射治疗历来包括标准的 1.8-2 Gy 分次治疗,每天治疗 4-6 周。对于常见的皮肤恶性肿瘤,如基底细胞癌和鳞状细胞癌,低分次治疗方案的肿瘤控制效果和毒性与标准分次治疗方案相当。在此,我们报告了我院对 MCC 采用超分割放疗与标准分割放疗的结果:研究对接受放疗的 MCC 患者进行了回顾性分析。研究收集了治疗特征和患者预后,包括急性毒性、疾病复发和生存数据。以死亡作为竞争风险,估计了局部和远处失败的累积发生率:24名患者共接受了29个疗程的治疗,其中13个疗程采用标准分次放疗,10个疗程采用低分次放疗,6个疗程采用单次分次(8 Gy)姑息性放疗。半数患者接受了头颈部部位的治疗。以治愈为目的进行辅助治疗的患者子集中包括8名标准分次放疗患者和8名低分次放疗患者。两组患者的局部和/或远处失败率或总生存率在统计学上无明显差异:结论:相对于标准分次放疗,低分次放疗治疗MCC的疗效相似。在我们有限的患者样本中,低分次放射治疗以相似的毒性和较少的治疗次数取得了相似的疗效。要确认治疗的耐受性和疗效,还需要对更大范围、更长时间的随访患者进行进一步分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
期刊最新文献
The impact of radiation-related lymphocyte recovery on the prognosis of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a retrospective analysis. Correction: Artificial intelligence contouring in radiotherapy for organs-at-risk and lymph node areas. Deep learning-based synthetic CT for dosimetric monitoring of combined conventional radiotherapy and lattice boost in large lung tumors. Correction: The significance of risk stratification through nomogram-based assessment in determining postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients diagnosed with pT1 - 2N1M0 breast cancer. Sequential or simultaneous-integrated boost in early-stage breast cancer patients: trade-offs between skin toxicity and risk of compromised coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1