Xinya Li, Yonglan Tang, Zihong Bai, Xin Liang, Xiaxuan Huang, Jianguang Chen, Hongtao Cheng, Jun Lyu, Yu Wang
{"title":"Assessing the Risk of Delirium and Death in Sepsis Using the Braden Score: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Xinya Li, Yonglan Tang, Zihong Bai, Xin Liang, Xiaxuan Huang, Jianguang Chen, Hongtao Cheng, Jun Lyu, Yu Wang","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To provide a viable tool for the early clinical identification of high-risk populations in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Sepsis-associated delirium (SAD) has the potential to significantly impact the short- and long-term prognosis of patients. However, accurately predicting and effectively managing SAD remains a significant challenge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a retrospective analysis of adult sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for the first time. Patients were divided into two groups based on their initial Braden score upon admission to the ICU: a high-risk group (≤ 15 points) and a low-risk group (> 15 points). The relationship between Braden score and delirium was assessed using logistic regression and restricted cubic splines, while restricted mean survival time was employed to analyse the relationship between Braden scores and patients' 90- and 180-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 28,312 patients included in the study, those in the high-risk group exhibited a significantly elevated risk of delirium (44.8% vs. 29.7%) and higher 90-day (28.7% vs. 19.4%) and 180-day (33.2% vs. 24.1%) mortality rates (all p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables, logistic regression demonstrated that the risk of delirium was 1.54 times higher in the high-risk group (95% CI = 1.45-1.64, p < 0.001). Following propensity score matching, the difference in survival was statistically significant at both time points, with the high-risk group having a reduced survival rate of 7.50 days (95% CI = -8.24, -6.75; p < 0.001) and 15.74 days (95% CI = -17.40, -14.08; p < 0.001) at 90 days and 180 days, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Braden score is a simple and effective tool for the early identification of patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes in sepsis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>The Braden score can be employed by clinical nurses for the purpose of early identification of poor prognostic risk in patients with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study was conducted according to the Strengthening Research in Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Patients were involved in the sample of the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims and objectives: To provide a viable tool for the early clinical identification of high-risk populations in patients with sepsis.
Background: Sepsis-associated delirium (SAD) has the potential to significantly impact the short- and long-term prognosis of patients. However, accurately predicting and effectively managing SAD remains a significant challenge.
Methods: This study employed a retrospective analysis of adult sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for the first time. Patients were divided into two groups based on their initial Braden score upon admission to the ICU: a high-risk group (≤ 15 points) and a low-risk group (> 15 points). The relationship between Braden score and delirium was assessed using logistic regression and restricted cubic splines, while restricted mean survival time was employed to analyse the relationship between Braden scores and patients' 90- and 180-day mortality.
Results: Of the 28,312 patients included in the study, those in the high-risk group exhibited a significantly elevated risk of delirium (44.8% vs. 29.7%) and higher 90-day (28.7% vs. 19.4%) and 180-day (33.2% vs. 24.1%) mortality rates (all p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables, logistic regression demonstrated that the risk of delirium was 1.54 times higher in the high-risk group (95% CI = 1.45-1.64, p < 0.001). Following propensity score matching, the difference in survival was statistically significant at both time points, with the high-risk group having a reduced survival rate of 7.50 days (95% CI = -8.24, -6.75; p < 0.001) and 15.74 days (95% CI = -17.40, -14.08; p < 0.001) at 90 days and 180 days, respectively.
Conclusions: The Braden score is a simple and effective tool for the early identification of patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes in sepsis.
Design: Retrospective study.
Relevance to clinical practice: The Braden score can be employed by clinical nurses for the purpose of early identification of poor prognostic risk in patients with sepsis.
Reporting method: This study was conducted according to the Strengthening Research in Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.
Patient or public contribution: Patients were involved in the sample of the study.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice.
JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
