Optimising Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening of 65 Year Old Men by Exploring Risk Factor Based Targeted Screening Strategies in Light of Declining Prevalence of the Disease.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.10.005
Patrik Söderberg, Anders Wanhainen, Sverker Svensjö
{"title":"Optimising Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening of 65 Year Old Men by Exploring Risk Factor Based Targeted Screening Strategies in Light of Declining Prevalence of the Disease.","authors":"Patrik Söderberg, Anders Wanhainen, Sverker Svensjö","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A decline in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) prevalence calls into question the credibility of general population screening of 65 year old men. Selectively targeting high risk individuals among this group could be more effective in preventing death from AAA rupture. This cross sectional study analysed risk factor data in a cohort of 65 year old men screened in the Swedish general population based AAA screening program, with the aim of exploring the effectiveness of hypothetical targeted screening strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All men attending AAA screening in four neighbouring counties in Sweden between 2006 and 2010 completed a health questionnaire on smoking habits and medical history. Abdominal aortic aneurysm was defined as measuring ≥ 30 mm. The sensitivity and specificity of different targeted screening strategies, with targeted subpopulations defined by duration of smoking with and without additional risk factors, were explored using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 232 men were screened, with 236 (1.5%) screening detected AAAs. A strategy combining smoking, presence of coronary artery disease (CAD), or both was associated with the mathematically optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity (optimal threshold) in the ROC analysis. The optimal threshold corresponded to targeting men having smoked for thirty years or more, a history of CAD, or both, where 74.0% of all AAAs could be detected by screening 33.0% of the population, compared with general screening. Targeting men that have smoked for ten years or more indicated that 84.0% of all AAAs could be detected by screening 55.0% of the population. A simplified strategy of targeting ever smokers resulted in detecting 85.0% of all AAAs by screening 61.0% of the population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Targeted screening of men at high risk of AAA, focusing on smoking history for inclusion, may be a safe and effective alternative to general population screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.10.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A decline in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) prevalence calls into question the credibility of general population screening of 65 year old men. Selectively targeting high risk individuals among this group could be more effective in preventing death from AAA rupture. This cross sectional study analysed risk factor data in a cohort of 65 year old men screened in the Swedish general population based AAA screening program, with the aim of exploring the effectiveness of hypothetical targeted screening strategies.

Methods: All men attending AAA screening in four neighbouring counties in Sweden between 2006 and 2010 completed a health questionnaire on smoking habits and medical history. Abdominal aortic aneurysm was defined as measuring ≥ 30 mm. The sensitivity and specificity of different targeted screening strategies, with targeted subpopulations defined by duration of smoking with and without additional risk factors, were explored using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results: A total of 16 232 men were screened, with 236 (1.5%) screening detected AAAs. A strategy combining smoking, presence of coronary artery disease (CAD), or both was associated with the mathematically optimal balance between sensitivity and specificity (optimal threshold) in the ROC analysis. The optimal threshold corresponded to targeting men having smoked for thirty years or more, a history of CAD, or both, where 74.0% of all AAAs could be detected by screening 33.0% of the population, compared with general screening. Targeting men that have smoked for ten years or more indicated that 84.0% of all AAAs could be detected by screening 55.0% of the population. A simplified strategy of targeting ever smokers resulted in detecting 85.0% of all AAAs by screening 61.0% of the population.

Conclusion: Targeted screening of men at high risk of AAA, focusing on smoking history for inclusion, may be a safe and effective alternative to general population screening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鉴于腹主动脉瘤患病率下降,探索基于风险因素的目标筛查策略,优化 65 岁男性腹主动脉瘤筛查。
目的:腹主动脉瘤(AAA)发病率的下降使人们对对 65 岁男性进行全民筛查的可信度产生了怀疑。有选择性地针对这一群体中的高危人群进行筛查,可以更有效地预防 AAA 破裂导致的死亡。这项横断面研究分析了在瑞典AAA筛查计划中接受筛查的65岁男性群体的风险因素数据,目的是探讨假设的针对性筛查策略的有效性:2006年至2010年期间,瑞典四个邻近县所有参加AAA筛查的男性均填写了一份关于吸烟习惯和病史的健康问卷。腹主动脉瘤的定义是直径≥ 30 毫米。利用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)探讨了不同目标筛查策略的灵敏度和特异性,目标亚群由吸烟时间长短和是否有其他风险因素来定义:共筛查了 16 232 名男性,其中 236 人(1.5%)筛查出 AAA。在 ROC 分析中,结合吸烟、冠状动脉疾病(CAD)或两者的策略与灵敏度和特异性之间的数学最佳平衡(最佳阈值)有关。与普通筛查相比,最佳阈值是针对吸烟 30 年或以上、有冠状动脉疾病史或两者兼有的男性,通过筛查 33.0% 的人群可发现 74.0% 的 AAA。针对吸烟十年或十年以上的男性,55.0% 的人群通过筛查可发现 84.0% 的 AAA。针对曾经吸烟者的简化策略可通过筛查61.0%的人群发现85.0%的AAA:结论:对罹患 AAA 的高风险男性进行有针对性的筛查,重点是将吸烟史纳入筛查范围,这可能是替代普通人群筛查的一种安全有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
期刊最新文献
Long Term Outcomes of Endovascular Repair in Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury: A Twenty Year Multicentre Follow Up Study. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Underpinning Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Surgery: A Systematic Review. Long Term Quality of Life, Health Status, and Residential Destination after Emergency Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Daily Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning for Intermittent Claudication: A Sham Controlled Randomised Trial. Outcomes of Endovascular Repair for Ascending Aortic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1