Implementation of an Occupational Sun Safety Intervention: A Comparison of Two Scalability Strategies.

IF 1.4 Journal of occupational and environmental medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000003248

David B Buller, Mary Klein Buller, Richard Meenan, Gary R Cutter, Julia Berteletti, Kimberly L Henry, Alishia Kinsey, Irene Adjei, Noah Chirico

{"title":"Implementation of an Occupational Sun Safety Intervention: A Comparison of Two Scalability Strategies.","authors":"David B Buller, Mary Klein Buller, Richard Meenan, Gary R Cutter, Julia Berteletti, Kimberly L Henry, Alishia Kinsey, Irene Adjei, Noah Chirico","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Two methods for scaling up an evidence-based occupational sun protection program were compared.Methods: Regional districts ( n = 138) in 21 state Departments of Transportation throughout the United States were randomized to receive the Go Sun Smart at Work program via in-person or digital scalability methods in 2019-2022 in 1:2 ratio. Managers completed pretest and posttest surveys and employees completed posttest surveys. Because of the COVID pandemic, only posttest measures were analyzed ( n = 255 managers; n = 1387 employees).Results: After scale-up, more employees reported training (b = 0.381, P = 0.021) and communication (b = 0.112, P = 0.049) at workplaces in in-person rather than digital strategy. There were no differences in managers' reports of sun protection training, communication, or actions by scalability method ( P > 0.05).Conclusions: Occupational sun protection was implemented during program scale up and employees recalled training/communication more in the in-person than digital strategy.","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e22-e33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Two methods for scaling up an evidence-based occupational sun protection program were compared.

Methods: Regional districts ( n = 138) in 21 state Departments of Transportation throughout the United States were randomized to receive the Go Sun Smart at Work program via in-person or digital scalability methods in 2019-2022 in 1:2 ratio. Managers completed pretest and posttest surveys and employees completed posttest surveys. Because of the COVID pandemic, only posttest measures were analyzed ( n = 255 managers; n = 1387 employees).

Results: After scale-up, more employees reported training (b = 0.381, P = 0.021) and communication (b = 0.112, P = 0.049) at workplaces in in-person rather than digital strategy. There were no differences in managers' reports of sun protection training, communication, or actions by scalability method ( P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Occupational sun protection was implemented during program scale up and employees recalled training/communication more in the in-person than digital strategy.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

实施职业防晒安全干预措施：两种可扩展性策略的比较。

目的：比较了推广循证职业防晒计划的两种方法：比较了推广循证职业防晒计划的两种方法：全美 21 个州交通部的地区（n = 138）按 1:2 的比例被随机分配到 2019-2022 年通过面授或数字扩展方法接受 "工作中注意防晒 "计划。管理人员完成了测试前和测试后调查，员工完成了测试后调查。由于 COVID 大流行，只分析了测试后的测量结果（n = 255 名管理人员；n = 1387 名员工）：扩大规模后，更多员工表示在工作场所接受的培训（b = 0.381，p = 0.021）和交流（b = 0.112，p = 0.049）采用的是面对面而非数字化策略。管理人员对防晒培训、沟通或行动的报告与扩展方法没有差异（p > 0.05）：结论：在项目扩展过程中，职业防晒得到了实施，员工对面对面培训/交流的回忆多于数字化策略。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine

自引率

0.00%

发文量