Validation and Spatial–Temporal Variability of Particulate Matter in Urban area Using WRF-Chem with Local and Global Emission Inventories

IF 3.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1007/s11270-024-07540-4
Yagni Rami, Anurag Kandya, Abha Chhabra, Aman W. Khan, Prashant Kumar, Sneha Gautam
{"title":"Validation and Spatial–Temporal Variability of Particulate Matter in Urban area Using WRF-Chem with Local and Global Emission Inventories","authors":"Yagni Rami,&nbsp;Anurag Kandya,&nbsp;Abha Chhabra,&nbsp;Aman W. Khan,&nbsp;Prashant Kumar,&nbsp;Sneha Gautam","doi":"10.1007/s11270-024-07540-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the validation and spatial–temporal variability of simulated PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations over Ahmedabad city using the WRF-Chem model with EDGAR global emissions and locally developed PM emissions as inputs. The validation process involves comparing simulated PM<sub>10</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and meteorological parameters with in-situ measurements from stations at Pirana and S P Stadium during 16th-17th May and 16th-17th December 2018. The analysis focuses on six-hourly averaged data, highlighting the significant role of Wind Speed, Wind Direction, and Planetary Boundary Layer Height (PBLH) in the dispersion of air pollutants. The results show that the model using locally developed PM emissions significantly reduces bias and provides better spatial distribution patterns compared to EDGAR emissions. For instance, in May, the average simulated PM<sub>10</sub> using EDGAR emissions was 85 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, while the locally developed emissions yielded an average of 183 µg/m<sup>3</sup>, closer to the observed in-situ average of 178 µg/m<sup>3</sup>. Similarly, in December, the simulated PM<sub>10</sub> using EDGAR emissions was 97 µg/m<sup>3</sup> compared to 232 µg/m<sup>3</sup> from local emissions, with an in-situ average of 147 µg/m<sup>3</sup>. The spatial analysis reveals that during May, 52% of the western areas experienced 'Good' air quality in the morning, decreasing to 40% by the evening. In contrast, December showed more severe pollution, with 45% of the North–North Western city experiencing 'Moderately Polluted' air quality by evening. The correlation coefficients (R<sup>2</sup>) for PM<sub>10</sub> validation at Pirana and S P Stadium were 0.73 and 0.93 respectively in May using EDGAR emissions, improving to 0.77 and 0.91 with local emissions. This study underscores the need for improved emission inventories and mitigation strategies to enhance air quality in Ahmedabad. The significant seasonal variations and the impact of meteorological parameters on pollutant dispersion highlight the importance of localized data and targeted interventions for effective air quality management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":808,"journal":{"name":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","volume":"235 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water, Air, & Soil Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11270-024-07540-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the validation and spatial–temporal variability of simulated PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations over Ahmedabad city using the WRF-Chem model with EDGAR global emissions and locally developed PM emissions as inputs. The validation process involves comparing simulated PM10, PM2.5, and meteorological parameters with in-situ measurements from stations at Pirana and S P Stadium during 16th-17th May and 16th-17th December 2018. The analysis focuses on six-hourly averaged data, highlighting the significant role of Wind Speed, Wind Direction, and Planetary Boundary Layer Height (PBLH) in the dispersion of air pollutants. The results show that the model using locally developed PM emissions significantly reduces bias and provides better spatial distribution patterns compared to EDGAR emissions. For instance, in May, the average simulated PM10 using EDGAR emissions was 85 µg/m3, while the locally developed emissions yielded an average of 183 µg/m3, closer to the observed in-situ average of 178 µg/m3. Similarly, in December, the simulated PM10 using EDGAR emissions was 97 µg/m3 compared to 232 µg/m3 from local emissions, with an in-situ average of 147 µg/m3. The spatial analysis reveals that during May, 52% of the western areas experienced 'Good' air quality in the morning, decreasing to 40% by the evening. In contrast, December showed more severe pollution, with 45% of the North–North Western city experiencing 'Moderately Polluted' air quality by evening. The correlation coefficients (R2) for PM10 validation at Pirana and S P Stadium were 0.73 and 0.93 respectively in May using EDGAR emissions, improving to 0.77 and 0.91 with local emissions. This study underscores the need for improved emission inventories and mitigation strategies to enhance air quality in Ahmedabad. The significant seasonal variations and the impact of meteorological parameters on pollutant dispersion highlight the importance of localized data and targeted interventions for effective air quality management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 WRF-Chem 和本地及全球排放清单验证城市地区颗粒物的时空变异性
本研究使用 WRF-Chem 模型,以 EDGAR 全球排放量和当地开发的 PM 排放量为输入,对艾哈迈达巴德市上空模拟 PM10 和 PM2.5 浓度的验证和时空变异性进行了研究。验证过程包括将模拟的 PM10、PM2.5 和气象参数与 2018 年 5 月 16 日至 17 日和 12 月 16 日至 17 日在 Pirana 和 S P 体育馆的站点进行的现场测量结果进行比较。分析侧重于六小时平均数据,突出了风速、风向和行星边界层高度(PBLH)在空气污染物扩散中的重要作用。结果表明,与 EDGAR 排放量相比,使用本地开发的可吸入颗粒物排放模型大大减少了偏差,并提供了更好的空间分布模式。例如,在 5 月份,使用 EDGAR 排放量模拟的 PM10 平均值为 85 微克/立方米,而本地开发的排放量得出的平均值为 183 微克/立方米,更接近于观测到的 178 微克/立方米的现场平均值。同样,在 12 月份,使用 EDGAR 排放模拟的 PM10 为 97 微克/立方米,而本地排放的 PM10 为 232 微克/立方米,现场平均值为 147 微克/立方米。空间分析显示,5 月份,52% 的西部地区在早晨的空气质量为 "良",到傍晚时降至 40%。相比之下,12 月份的污染更为严重,傍晚时分,45% 的西北部城市空气质量为 "中度污染"。5 月份,使用 EDGAR 排放数据,皮拉纳和 S P 体育馆 PM10 验证相关系数(R2)分别为 0.73 和 0.93,使用本地排放数据,相关系数分别提高到 0.77 和 0.91。这项研究强调了改进排放清单和减排策略以提高艾哈迈达巴德空气质量的必要性。明显的季节性变化和气象参数对污染物扩散的影响凸显了本地化数据和有针对性的干预措施对有效管理空气质量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.90%
发文量
448
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Water, Air, & Soil Pollution is an international, interdisciplinary journal on all aspects of pollution and solutions to pollution in the biosphere. This includes chemical, physical and biological processes affecting flora, fauna, water, air and soil in relation to environmental pollution. Because of its scope, the subject areas are diverse and include all aspects of pollution sources, transport, deposition, accumulation, acid precipitation, atmospheric pollution, metals, aquatic pollution including marine pollution and ground water, waste water, pesticides, soil pollution, sewage, sediment pollution, forestry pollution, effects of pollutants on humans, vegetation, fish, aquatic species, micro-organisms, and animals, environmental and molecular toxicology applied to pollution research, biosensors, global and climate change, ecological implications of pollution and pollution models. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution also publishes manuscripts on novel methods used in the study of environmental pollutants, environmental toxicology, environmental biology, novel environmental engineering related to pollution, biodiversity as influenced by pollution, novel environmental biotechnology as applied to pollution (e.g. bioremediation), environmental modelling and biorestoration of polluted environments. Articles should not be submitted that are of local interest only and do not advance international knowledge in environmental pollution and solutions to pollution. Articles that simply replicate known knowledge or techniques while researching a local pollution problem will normally be rejected without review. Submitted articles must have up-to-date references, employ the correct experimental replication and statistical analysis, where needed and contain a significant contribution to new knowledge. The publishing and editorial team sincerely appreciate your cooperation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution publishes research papers; review articles; mini-reviews; and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Water Quality Assessment, Possible Pollution Source Identification from Anthropogenically Stressed River Yamuna, India using Hydrochemical, Water Quality Indices and Multivariate Statistics Analysis The Novel Study On Arsenic Contamination, Health Risk, and Approaches to Its Mitigation From Water Resource of a Developing Country: A potential review Preparation and Characterization of a Novel Ca-Fe-Si-S Composite for the Simultaneous Stabilization of Heavy Metals in Arsenic Slag Ecological Health Assessments, based on Chemical Pollution and the Multimetric Fish Model, in a Temperate Monsoon River and their Spatiotemporal Variability Enhanced Cyanide Oxidation to Cyanate via Photocatalytic Ozonation: Comparing Sol–Gel and Hydrothermal Synthesis of BiVO4 Catalysts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1