It is not just ‘the opposite of jealousy’: a Buddhist perspective on the emotion of compersion in consensually non-monogamous relationships

Hin Sing Yuen, Luu Zörlein, Sven Walter
{"title":"It is not just ‘the opposite of jealousy’: a Buddhist perspective on the emotion of compersion in consensually non-monogamous relationships","authors":"Hin Sing Yuen,&nbsp;Luu Zörlein,&nbsp;Sven Walter","doi":"10.1007/s44204-024-00171-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Compersion is an affective state commonly discussed in the context of consensually non-monogamous relationships. It is typically described as a positive emotional reaction to one’s partner’s enjoying time and/or intimacy with another person, sort of ‘the opposite of jealousy’. Recent years have seen an increased interest in this seemingly startling emotion. Part of what makes understanding compersion so difficult is the mononormative expectations of our culture. We suggest that a non-Western, in particular Buddhist, perspective might be more helpful to understand that love and/or intimacy need not be an affair between two people only. We approach compersion through a Buddhist lens based on the ‘four immeasurables’, i.e. non-egocentric states that Buddhists take to promote well-being, and their ‘near enemies’, i.e. states which are easily conflated with them, but egocentric and harmful. Our goal is not to formulate a definition of compersion, nor to raise a normative bar for anyone who feels compersion, but to describe important facets of it that stand out more clearly against a Buddhist background than they might otherwise do. Such an approach not only enriches our understanding of compersion but contributes to people’s flourishing in <i>all</i> kinds of relationships and shows that non-monogamous relationships might be compatible with some forms of Buddhist practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93890,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of philosophy","volume":"3 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44204-024-00171-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44204-024-00171-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compersion is an affective state commonly discussed in the context of consensually non-monogamous relationships. It is typically described as a positive emotional reaction to one’s partner’s enjoying time and/or intimacy with another person, sort of ‘the opposite of jealousy’. Recent years have seen an increased interest in this seemingly startling emotion. Part of what makes understanding compersion so difficult is the mononormative expectations of our culture. We suggest that a non-Western, in particular Buddhist, perspective might be more helpful to understand that love and/or intimacy need not be an affair between two people only. We approach compersion through a Buddhist lens based on the ‘four immeasurables’, i.e. non-egocentric states that Buddhists take to promote well-being, and their ‘near enemies’, i.e. states which are easily conflated with them, but egocentric and harmful. Our goal is not to formulate a definition of compersion, nor to raise a normative bar for anyone who feels compersion, but to describe important facets of it that stand out more clearly against a Buddhist background than they might otherwise do. Such an approach not only enriches our understanding of compersion but contributes to people’s flourishing in all kinds of relationships and shows that non-monogamous relationships might be compatible with some forms of Buddhist practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这不仅仅是 "嫉妒的反面":从佛教的角度看自愿非一夫一妻制关系中的 "聚合 "情绪
情投意合是一种情感状态,通常在双方同意的非一夫一妻制关系中讨论。它通常被描述为一种积极的情绪反应,是对伴侣享受与他人在一起的时间和/或亲密关系的一种肯定,有点像 "嫉妒的反义词"。近年来,人们对这种看似惊人的情感越来越感兴趣。让人们如此难以理解 "相聚 "的部分原因在于我们的文化中存在着一成不变的期望。我们认为,从非西方的角度,尤其是佛教的角度来理解爱情和/或亲密关系不一定只是两个人之间的事情,可能会更有帮助。我们从佛教的视角来探讨伴侣关系,其基础是 "四无量",即佛教徒认为能促进幸福的非自我中心的状态,以及它们的 "近敌",即容易与它们混淆,但以自我为中心且有害的状态。我们的目的不是要给 "合群 "下一个定义,也不是要给任何有 "合群 "感觉的人提出一个规范性的标准,而是要描述 "合群 "的一些重要方面,在佛教背景下,这些方面可能会比其他方面更加明显。这种方法不仅丰富了我们对 "合群 "的理解,而且有助于人们在各种关系中的蓬勃发展,并表明非一夫一妻制关系可能与某些形式的佛教修行相容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What naturalism? great apes, old-fashioned philosophy, an the McDowellian language game Internalist reliabilism in statistics and machine learning: thoughts on Jun Otsuka’s Thinking about Statistics Defending phenomenal explanationism: responses to Fumerton, Huemer, McAllister, Piazza, Steup, and Zhang How the metaphysical and the ethical are intertwined: an organismic response to JeeLoo Liu Derivative normativity and logical pluralism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1