Evaluation of infiltration models based on simple multicriteria decision making across various soil types and land uses in India

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-27 DOI:10.1007/s12665-024-11872-z
Tridiv Ghosh, Bappa Das, Debasish Roy, Debashis Chakraborty, Deepak Sethi
{"title":"Evaluation of infiltration models based on simple multicriteria decision making across various soil types and land uses in India","authors":"Tridiv Ghosh,&nbsp;Bappa Das,&nbsp;Debasish Roy,&nbsp;Debashis Chakraborty,&nbsp;Deepak Sethi","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-11872-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Characterization of soil infiltration is crucial for designing and assessing hydrological processes. The study aimed to characterize the infiltration across various soil types (ranging from fine to moderately coarse in texture), agricultural land uses (including paddy fields, fallow lands, and upland crops) and major soil groups in India using Kostiakov, Philip, Horton, Holtan, Green and Ampt, and modified Kostiakov models. The mean basic infiltration rate was maximum in medium-texture soil (7.0 cm h<sup>− 1</sup>), followed by moderately fine (4.6 cm h<sup>− 1</sup>), fine (3.7 cm h<sup>− 1</sup>), and moderately coarse (3.2 cm h<sup>− 1</sup>) soils. Under paddy, fallow land uses and upland crops, the values of basic infiltration rate were 2.5, 4.1 and 5.3 cm h<sup>− 1</sup>, respectively. Across major soil groups, a significant variations in basic infiltration rates were observed among different soil types. Particularly, the highest infiltration rate was recorded in brown hill soil (8.1 cm h<sup>− 1</sup>); conversely, the lowest infiltration rate was in black soil (3.2 cm h<sup>− 1</sup>), attributed to the predominance of montmorillonite clay. By using rank-based multicriteria decision making, the Philip model was found to be the overall best-performing model. The Kostiakov model came in close second phase. Moreover, depending on the kind of land cover, Philip model outperformed other models, while Kostiakov fared better in upland crops and paddy fields. Additionally, Philip’s model also performed better than other infiltration models across a range of soil textures. The study emphasized the significane of choosing suitable models to appropriately quantify the infiltration across a range of hydrological and agricultural contexts by highlighting the effects of soil texture, land use, and soil type on infiltration rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"83 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11872-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Characterization of soil infiltration is crucial for designing and assessing hydrological processes. The study aimed to characterize the infiltration across various soil types (ranging from fine to moderately coarse in texture), agricultural land uses (including paddy fields, fallow lands, and upland crops) and major soil groups in India using Kostiakov, Philip, Horton, Holtan, Green and Ampt, and modified Kostiakov models. The mean basic infiltration rate was maximum in medium-texture soil (7.0 cm h− 1), followed by moderately fine (4.6 cm h− 1), fine (3.7 cm h− 1), and moderately coarse (3.2 cm h− 1) soils. Under paddy, fallow land uses and upland crops, the values of basic infiltration rate were 2.5, 4.1 and 5.3 cm h− 1, respectively. Across major soil groups, a significant variations in basic infiltration rates were observed among different soil types. Particularly, the highest infiltration rate was recorded in brown hill soil (8.1 cm h− 1); conversely, the lowest infiltration rate was in black soil (3.2 cm h− 1), attributed to the predominance of montmorillonite clay. By using rank-based multicriteria decision making, the Philip model was found to be the overall best-performing model. The Kostiakov model came in close second phase. Moreover, depending on the kind of land cover, Philip model outperformed other models, while Kostiakov fared better in upland crops and paddy fields. Additionally, Philip’s model also performed better than other infiltration models across a range of soil textures. The study emphasized the significane of choosing suitable models to appropriately quantify the infiltration across a range of hydrological and agricultural contexts by highlighting the effects of soil texture, land use, and soil type on infiltration rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于简单多标准决策的印度不同土壤类型和土地利用的渗透模型评估
土壤入渗特征对于设计和评估水文过程至关重要。这项研究旨在利用 Kostiakov、Philip、Horton、Holtan、Green 和 Ampt 以及修正的 Kostiakov 模型,分析印度各种土壤类型(质地从细粒到中等粗粒不等)、农田用途(包括水田、休耕地和高地作物)和主要土壤类别的渗透特征。中等质地土壤(7.0 厘米/小时-1)的平均基本渗透率最高,其次是中等细粒土壤(4.6 厘米/小时-1)、细粒土壤(3.7 厘米/小时-1)和中等粗粒土壤(3.2 厘米/小时-1)。在水稻田、休耕地和高地作物下,基本渗透率值分别为 2.5、4.1 和 5.3 厘米/小时-1。在主要土壤类别中,不同土壤类型的基本渗透率差异显著。特别是,褐山丘土壤的入渗率最高(8.1 厘米/小时-1);相反,黑土的入渗率最低(3.2 厘米/小时-1),这主要归因于蒙脱石粘土居多。通过基于等级的多标准决策,发现 Philip 模型是总体表现最佳的模型。Kostiakov 模型紧随其后。此外,根据土地覆被的种类,Philip 模型的表现优于其他模型,而 Kostiakov 模型在高地作物和水田的表现更好。此外,Philip 模型在各种土壤质地中的表现也优于其他渗透模型。通过强调土壤质地、土地利用和土壤类型对入渗率的影响,该研究强调了选择合适的模型来适当量化各种水文和农业环境中的入渗情况的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
期刊最新文献
Study on the influence of pipe jacking construction on existing subway tunnels Study on progressive damage and deformation law of coal body around borehole under different moisture states Hydrochemical stratigraphic analysis of the filling of the Meirama open pit mine II: parameters and elements Detection and comprehensive treatment for giant karst caves under the tunnel floor: a case study in Guangxi, China Mineralogical compositions and distributions of trace and rare earth elements in Eocene carbonaceous sediments of Western India: implications for paleoenvironment during peat accumulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1