Accurate birth weight prediction from fetal biometry using the Gompertz model

Chandrani Kumari , Gautam I. Menon , Leelavati Narlikar , Uma Ram , Rahul Siddharthan
{"title":"Accurate birth weight prediction from fetal biometry using the Gompertz model","authors":"Chandrani Kumari ,&nbsp;Gautam I. Menon ,&nbsp;Leelavati Narlikar ,&nbsp;Uma Ram ,&nbsp;Rahul Siddharthan","doi":"10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Monitoring of fetal growth and estimation of birth weight is of clinical importance. During pregnancy, ultrasound fetal biometry values including femur length, head circumference, abdominal circumference, biparietal diameter are measured and used to place fetuses on “growth charts”. There is no simple growth-model-based, predictive formula in use for fetal biometry. Estimation of fetal weight at birth currently depends on ultrasound data taken a short time before birth.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Our cohort (“Seethapathy cohort”) consists of ultrasound biometry measurements and other data for 774 pregnant women in Chennai, India, 2015–2017. We use the Gompertz model, a standard model for constrained growth, with just three intuitive parameters, to model the growth of fetal biometry, and a machine learning (ML) model trained on these parameters to predict birth weight (BW).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Gompertz model convincingly fits the growth of fetal biometry values. Two Gompertz parameters—<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>t</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> (inflection time) and <span><math><mi>c</mi></math></span> (rate of decrease of growth rate)—seem universal to all fetuses, while the third, <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span>, is an overall scale specific to each fetus, capturing individual variation. On the Seethapathy cohort we can infer <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span> for each fetus from ultrasound data available by the 24 or 35 weeks. Our ML model predicts birth weight with &lt; 8 % error, outperforming published methods that have access to late-term ultrasound data. The same model gives an 8.4 % error in BW prediction on an independent validation cohort of 365 women.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The Gompertz model fits fetal biometry growth and enables birth weight estimation without need of late-term ultrasounds. Aside from its clinical predictive value, we suggest its use for future growth standards, with almost all variation described by a single scale parameter <span><math><mi>A</mi></math></span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37085,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Monitoring of fetal growth and estimation of birth weight is of clinical importance. During pregnancy, ultrasound fetal biometry values including femur length, head circumference, abdominal circumference, biparietal diameter are measured and used to place fetuses on “growth charts”. There is no simple growth-model-based, predictive formula in use for fetal biometry. Estimation of fetal weight at birth currently depends on ultrasound data taken a short time before birth.

Study design

Our cohort (“Seethapathy cohort”) consists of ultrasound biometry measurements and other data for 774 pregnant women in Chennai, India, 2015–2017. We use the Gompertz model, a standard model for constrained growth, with just three intuitive parameters, to model the growth of fetal biometry, and a machine learning (ML) model trained on these parameters to predict birth weight (BW).

Results

The Gompertz model convincingly fits the growth of fetal biometry values. Two Gompertz parameters—t0 (inflection time) and c (rate of decrease of growth rate)—seem universal to all fetuses, while the third, A, is an overall scale specific to each fetus, capturing individual variation. On the Seethapathy cohort we can infer A for each fetus from ultrasound data available by the 24 or 35 weeks. Our ML model predicts birth weight with < 8 % error, outperforming published methods that have access to late-term ultrasound data. The same model gives an 8.4 % error in BW prediction on an independent validation cohort of 365 women.

Conclusions

The Gompertz model fits fetal biometry growth and enables birth weight estimation without need of late-term ultrasounds. Aside from its clinical predictive value, we suggest its use for future growth standards, with almost all variation described by a single scale parameter A.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用贡珀兹模型通过胎儿生物测量准确预测出生体重
目的监测胎儿生长和估计出生体重具有重要的临床意义。孕期超声胎儿生物测量值包括股骨长、头围、腹围、双顶径等,用于将胎儿置于 "生长曲线图 "上。目前还没有一个简单的基于生长模型的胎儿生物测量预测公式。研究设计我们的队列("Seethapathy 队列")由 2015-2017 年印度钦奈 774 名孕妇的超声生物测量数据和其他数据组成。我们使用 Gompertz 模型来模拟胎儿生物测量值的增长,该模型是受限增长的标准模型,仅有三个直观参数,并使用在这些参数基础上训练的机器学习 (ML) 模型来预测出生体重 (BW)。两个 Gompertz 参数-t0(拐点时间)和 c(生长率下降率)似乎对所有胎儿都适用,而第三个参数 A 则是每个胎儿特有的总体尺度,可捕捉个体差异。在 Seethapathy 的队列中,我们可以根据 24 周或 35 周前的超声波数据推断出每个胎儿的 A。我们的 ML 模型预测出生体重的误差为 8%,优于已发表的可获取晚期超声数据的方法。结论 Gompertz 模型适合胎儿生物测量生长,无需晚期超声检查即可估算出生体重。除了其临床预测价值外,我们还建议将其用于未来的生长标准,几乎所有的变化都可以用单一的标度参数 A 来描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Pentaerithrityl tetranitrate (PETN) for prevention of fetal growth restriction in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis Recurrent pain after laparoscopic surgery for ovarian endometrioma: Clinical features and long-term follow up The Association and diagnostic value between Maternal Serum Placental Markers and Placenta Previa Cervical cerclage vs cervical pessary in women with cervical insufficiency: A multicentric, open-label, randomised, controlled pilot trial [the CEPEIC trial] Vegetarian diet and pregnancy outcome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1