{"title":"Teaching accounting in the era of ChatGPT – The student perspective","authors":"Charlotte Haugland Sundkvist , Ellen M. Kulset","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2024.100932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines students’ perceived usefulness, intended future and current use of ChatGPT in a study context. Since the release of ChatGPT to the public, its potential impact on education, both positive and negative, has been heavily debated, but there is limited research on the students’ perception and use of ChatGPT. We find that students’ perceived usefulness of ChatGPT is increasing with variables such as general enthusiasm about new technology, ease of use, trustworthiness, and social influence from friends. The intention to use ChatGPT in a study context in the future is increasing with the same variables except for trustworthiness. Students who have previously used ChatGPT find it more likely that they will use it in a study context in the future. Several students seem to be aware that the answers from ChatGPT cannot always be trusted, but few mention that using ChatGPT in a study context can also have other negative effect on learning outcomes (i.e., if ChatGPT does much of the work instead of the student). The use of ChatGPT seems to depend upon type of course, and the students are more likely to use ChatGPT in other courses than accounting courses. We also find that students are most likely to use ChatGPT to answer course specific questions, and least likely to use it on exams.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575124000484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines students’ perceived usefulness, intended future and current use of ChatGPT in a study context. Since the release of ChatGPT to the public, its potential impact on education, both positive and negative, has been heavily debated, but there is limited research on the students’ perception and use of ChatGPT. We find that students’ perceived usefulness of ChatGPT is increasing with variables such as general enthusiasm about new technology, ease of use, trustworthiness, and social influence from friends. The intention to use ChatGPT in a study context in the future is increasing with the same variables except for trustworthiness. Students who have previously used ChatGPT find it more likely that they will use it in a study context in the future. Several students seem to be aware that the answers from ChatGPT cannot always be trusted, but few mention that using ChatGPT in a study context can also have other negative effect on learning outcomes (i.e., if ChatGPT does much of the work instead of the student). The use of ChatGPT seems to depend upon type of course, and the students are more likely to use ChatGPT in other courses than accounting courses. We also find that students are most likely to use ChatGPT to answer course specific questions, and least likely to use it on exams.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
