Esophageal placement of a biliary stent to manage a iatrogenic esophageal perforation: A case report

Saurin Dipak Dani, Dravina Shetty, Abhaya R. Gupta, Paras R. Kothari
{"title":"Esophageal placement of a biliary stent to manage a iatrogenic esophageal perforation: A case report","authors":"Saurin Dipak Dani,&nbsp;Dravina Shetty,&nbsp;Abhaya R. Gupta,&nbsp;Paras R. Kothari","doi":"10.1016/j.epsc.2024.102898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Post-operative anastomotic stricture can occur after a gastric tube esophagoplasty in children with esophageal atresia, resulting in difficulty swallowing. Endoscopic dilatation is commonly used to treat these strictures. The dilatations carry a risk of esophageal perforation.</div></div><div><h3>Case presentation</h3><div>A two-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit for an esophageal perforation that resulted from an esophageal dilatation. He had a history of long-gap type-C esophageal atresia/tracheo-esophageal, which had been managed with a cervical esophagostomy and a gastrostomy at birth, followed by an esophageal replacement by reverse gastric tube at the age of 17 months. At the age of 20 months, he developed dysphagia. An esophageal stricture was diagnosed by endoscopy. He underwent several balloon dilatations, followed by dilatations with solid dilators. The last dilatation was complicated by the esophageal perforation that prompted his hospital admission. At the time of the admission, we placed a chest tube, started antibiotics, and kept him NPO. We resumed enteral feedings 12 days after the perforation but immediately noticed that the formula was draining out of the chest tube. A surgical repair of the persistent fistula was deemed unsafe. We decided to place a biliary stent to cover the perforation endoscopically. Nasogastric feeds were reinitiated. The stent was kept in place for six weeks, while the patient was fed by a nasogastric tube. After 6 weeks, a contrast study confirmed that the perforation had sealed. Oral feedings were started at that time and the chest tube was removed. He has had no recurrence of the perforation or the stricture since then.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Biliary stents could be an option for the management of iatrogenic esophageal perforations in children.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45641,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 102898"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221357662400126X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Post-operative anastomotic stricture can occur after a gastric tube esophagoplasty in children with esophageal atresia, resulting in difficulty swallowing. Endoscopic dilatation is commonly used to treat these strictures. The dilatations carry a risk of esophageal perforation.

Case presentation

A two-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit for an esophageal perforation that resulted from an esophageal dilatation. He had a history of long-gap type-C esophageal atresia/tracheo-esophageal, which had been managed with a cervical esophagostomy and a gastrostomy at birth, followed by an esophageal replacement by reverse gastric tube at the age of 17 months. At the age of 20 months, he developed dysphagia. An esophageal stricture was diagnosed by endoscopy. He underwent several balloon dilatations, followed by dilatations with solid dilators. The last dilatation was complicated by the esophageal perforation that prompted his hospital admission. At the time of the admission, we placed a chest tube, started antibiotics, and kept him NPO. We resumed enteral feedings 12 days after the perforation but immediately noticed that the formula was draining out of the chest tube. A surgical repair of the persistent fistula was deemed unsafe. We decided to place a biliary stent to cover the perforation endoscopically. Nasogastric feeds were reinitiated. The stent was kept in place for six weeks, while the patient was fed by a nasogastric tube. After 6 weeks, a contrast study confirmed that the perforation had sealed. Oral feedings were started at that time and the chest tube was removed. He has had no recurrence of the perforation or the stricture since then.

Conclusion

Biliary stents could be an option for the management of iatrogenic esophageal perforations in children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食管置入胆道支架治疗先天性食管穿孔:病例报告
导言:食道闭锁儿童在接受胃管食道成形术后可能会出现术后吻合口狭窄,导致吞咽困难。内窥镜扩张术通常用于治疗这些狭窄。病例介绍 一名两岁男童因食管扩张导致食管穿孔而被送入重症监护室。他曾患有长间隙C型食管闭锁/气管食管,出生时曾接受过颈部食管造口术和胃造口术,17个月大时接受了反向胃管食管置换术。20 个月大时,他出现了吞咽困难。通过内窥镜检查,他被诊断为食道狭窄。他接受了数次球囊扩张术,之后又用固体扩张器进行了扩张。最后一次扩张因食管穿孔而并发,导致他入院治疗。入院时,我们为他插上了胸管,开始使用抗生素,并保持 NPO。穿孔 12 天后,我们恢复了肠内喂养,但立即发现配方奶从胸管中流出。手术修补持续存在的瘘管被认为是不安全的。我们决定在内镜下放置一个胆道支架来覆盖穿孔。重新开始了鼻饲。支架放置了六周,患者使用鼻胃管进食。6 周后,造影剂检查证实穿孔已经封堵。于是开始口服喂食,并拔掉了胸管。结论胆道支架是治疗儿童先天性食管穿孔的一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
348
审稿时长
15 days
期刊最新文献
Spontaneous enterocutaneous fistula in a neonate: A case report Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the sigmoid colon: A case report 3D-printed model for surgical planning in congenital porto-systemic shunt: A case report Rapidly progressing necrotizing fasciitis with chickenpox infection: A case series Spigelian hernia diagnosed in a newborn: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1