Comorbidity and adverse events in acquired hemophilia A: data from the GTH-AHA-EMI study

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102565
{"title":"Comorbidity and adverse events in acquired hemophilia A: data from the GTH-AHA-EMI study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Persons with acquired hemophilia A are often older and suffer from comorbidity or frailty. Little is known about the impact on clinically relevant outcomes of acquired hemophilia A.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the relevance of age, physical performance status, comorbidity, and concomitant medication on the risk of bleeding and other outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Post hoc analysis of data from the GTH-AHA-EMI study that used emicizumab for bleed protection and withheld immunosuppressive treatment during the early phase of management. Primary endpoint was the rate of clinically relevant new bleeding (CRNB) during the first 12 weeks of emicizumab prophylaxis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Forty-seven patients were enrolled. Median age was 76 years; performance status (World Health Organization performance status [WHO-PS]) was 3 or worse in 41%; Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 5 or higher in 63%; antithrombotic drugs were reported in 34%. Rate of CRNB during 12 weeks of emicizumab prophylaxis was similar across subgroups of age, sex, WHO-PS, CCI, baseline factor VIII activity, and inhibitor titer. Patients with CRNB during the study had more severe anemia already at baseline. However, persistent severe anemia in week 4 was not related to risk of bleeding beyond this time. CRNB was associated with injury from falling in 7 of 14 patients. Adverse events grade 3 or higher were not related to baseline CCI or age but were more frequent in patients with poor WHO-PS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Emicizumab provided bleed protection regardless of age and comorbidity. Clinical baseline characteristics did not predict breakthrough bleeding under emicizumab. Poor WHO-PS at baseline was associated with severe adverse events during the study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002607","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Persons with acquired hemophilia A are often older and suffer from comorbidity or frailty. Little is known about the impact on clinically relevant outcomes of acquired hemophilia A.

Objectives

To assess the relevance of age, physical performance status, comorbidity, and concomitant medication on the risk of bleeding and other outcomes.

Methods

Post hoc analysis of data from the GTH-AHA-EMI study that used emicizumab for bleed protection and withheld immunosuppressive treatment during the early phase of management. Primary endpoint was the rate of clinically relevant new bleeding (CRNB) during the first 12 weeks of emicizumab prophylaxis.

Results

Forty-seven patients were enrolled. Median age was 76 years; performance status (World Health Organization performance status [WHO-PS]) was 3 or worse in 41%; Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was 5 or higher in 63%; antithrombotic drugs were reported in 34%. Rate of CRNB during 12 weeks of emicizumab prophylaxis was similar across subgroups of age, sex, WHO-PS, CCI, baseline factor VIII activity, and inhibitor titer. Patients with CRNB during the study had more severe anemia already at baseline. However, persistent severe anemia in week 4 was not related to risk of bleeding beyond this time. CRNB was associated with injury from falling in 7 of 14 patients. Adverse events grade 3 or higher were not related to baseline CCI or age but were more frequent in patients with poor WHO-PS.

Conclusion

Emicizumab provided bleed protection regardless of age and comorbidity. Clinical baseline characteristics did not predict breakthrough bleeding under emicizumab. Poor WHO-PS at baseline was associated with severe adverse events during the study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
获得性血友病 A 的合并症和不良事件:来自 GTH-AHA-EMI 研究的数据
背景后天性甲型血友病患者通常年龄较大,患有合并症或身体虚弱。方法 对 GTH-AHA-EMI 研究的数据进行事后分析,该研究使用埃米珠单抗保护出血,并在早期管理阶段暂停免疫抑制治疗。主要终点是埃米珠单抗预防性治疗头12周内临床相关新出血率(CRNB)。中位年龄为76岁;41%的患者表现状态(世界卫生组织表现状态[WHO-PS])为3级或更差;63%的患者夏尔森合并症指数(CCI)为5级或更高;34%的患者报告服用了抗血栓药物。不同年龄、性别、WHO-PS、CCI、基线因子 VIII 活性和抑制剂滴度的亚组在埃米珠单抗预防治疗 12 周期间的 CRNB 发生率相似。在研究期间出现 CRNB 的患者在基线时已经出现了较严重的贫血。然而,第 4 周的持续严重贫血与此后的出血风险无关。14 名患者中有 7 名患者的 CRNB 与摔伤有关。3级或更高的不良事件与基线CCI或年龄无关,但在WHO-PS较差的患者中更为常见。临床基线特征并不能预测埃米珠单抗的突破性出血。基线WHO-PS较差与研究期间的严重不良事件有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
212
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comorbidity and adverse events in acquired hemophilia A: data from the GTH-AHA-EMI study Hyperfibrinolysis: a crucial phenotypic abnormality of posttraumatic fibrinolytic dysfunction Mathematical modeling identifies clotting factor combinations that modify thrombin generation in normal and factor VIII-, IX-, or XI-deficient blood Impact of the VTE-PREDICT calculator on clinicians’ decision making in fictional patients with venous thromboembolism: a randomized controlled trial The impact of pulmonary embolism on health outcomes of COVID-19 at 3 months after hospitalization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1