Endoscopic stricturotomy and strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease–related duodenal strictures

iGIE Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2024.06.001
Shanshan Wang MD , Nan Lan PhD, MD , Bo Shen MD
{"title":"Endoscopic stricturotomy and strictureplasty for Crohn’s disease–related duodenal strictures","authors":"Shanshan Wang MD ,&nbsp;Nan Lan PhD, MD ,&nbsp;Bo Shen MD","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Duodenal stricturing in Crohn’s disease is rare, and its management has been challenging. Fibrotic or mixed inflammatory/fibrotic primary strictures of Crohn’s disease do not respond well to medical therapy, eventually requiring endoscopic or surgical intervention. Endoscopic balloon dilation has been considered a middle-of-the-road strategy between medical and surgical approaches but is limited by its efficacy in primary stricture, recurrence, and frequent need for redilation. To address these issues, novel strategies, including endoscopic stricturotomy and strictureplasty utilizing electroincision, have been developed. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic electroincision therapy in Crohn’s disease–related duodenal strictures in a small cohort of consecutive patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data on patients diagnosed with Crohn’s disease and duodenal strictures who were treated with endoscopic electroincision were consecutively extracted from the interventional inflammatory bowel disease unit from December 2, 2019, to January 31 of 2024. All patients with anastomotic stricture were excluded from the study. The primary outcomes were surgery-free survival and postprocedural adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight endoscopic electroincision therapies were performed in 5 patients for Crohn’s disease–induced duodenal stricture. The study found a technical success rate of 88%, and a clinical response rate of 100%. The adverse event rate was unremarkable. The rate of endoscopic retreatment was 60%, with a minimum 6-month interval. In follow-up, no patient required surgical intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both endoscopic stricturotomy and strictureplasty seem to be effective and safe therapeutic modalities for Crohn’s disease–associated duodenal stricture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 342-345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Duodenal stricturing in Crohn’s disease is rare, and its management has been challenging. Fibrotic or mixed inflammatory/fibrotic primary strictures of Crohn’s disease do not respond well to medical therapy, eventually requiring endoscopic or surgical intervention. Endoscopic balloon dilation has been considered a middle-of-the-road strategy between medical and surgical approaches but is limited by its efficacy in primary stricture, recurrence, and frequent need for redilation. To address these issues, novel strategies, including endoscopic stricturotomy and strictureplasty utilizing electroincision, have been developed. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic electroincision therapy in Crohn’s disease–related duodenal strictures in a small cohort of consecutive patients.

Methods

Data on patients diagnosed with Crohn’s disease and duodenal strictures who were treated with endoscopic electroincision were consecutively extracted from the interventional inflammatory bowel disease unit from December 2, 2019, to January 31 of 2024. All patients with anastomotic stricture were excluded from the study. The primary outcomes were surgery-free survival and postprocedural adverse events.

Results

Eight endoscopic electroincision therapies were performed in 5 patients for Crohn’s disease–induced duodenal stricture. The study found a technical success rate of 88%, and a clinical response rate of 100%. The adverse event rate was unremarkable. The rate of endoscopic retreatment was 60%, with a minimum 6-month interval. In follow-up, no patient required surgical intervention.

Conclusions

Both endoscopic stricturotomy and strictureplasty seem to be effective and safe therapeutic modalities for Crohn’s disease–associated duodenal stricture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗克罗恩病相关十二指肠狭窄的内镜下狭窄切除术和狭窄成形术
背景和目的克罗恩病的十二指肠狭窄非常罕见,其治疗一直是个难题。克罗恩病的纤维化或混合性炎症/纤维化原发性狭窄对药物治疗反应不佳,最终需要内镜或手术干预。内镜下球囊扩张术一直被认为是介于药物治疗和手术治疗之间的中间策略,但由于其对原发性狭窄的疗效、复发和经常需要重新扩张而受到限制。为了解决这些问题,人们开发了新的策略,包括内镜下狭窄切开术和利用电切口的狭窄成形术。本研究旨在分析内镜下电切疗法在一小批连续患者中治疗克罗恩病相关十二指肠狭窄的有效性和安全性。方法从2019年12月2日至2024年1月31日,连续从炎症性肠病介入科提取被诊断为克罗恩病和十二指肠狭窄并接受内镜下电切治疗的患者数据。研究排除了所有吻合口狭窄患者。主要结果为无手术生存期和手术后不良事件。结果对5例克罗恩病引起的十二指肠狭窄患者进行了8次内镜电切疗法。研究发现,技术成功率为 88%,临床反应率为 100%。不良事件发生率并不突出。内镜再治疗率为 60%,至少间隔 6 个月。结论内镜下十二指肠狭窄切除术和狭窄成形术似乎都是治疗克罗恩病相关十二指肠狭窄的有效而安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preliminary validation of the virtual bariatric endoscopic simulator Unexpected clipping failure of a full-thickness resection device during endoscopic full-thickness resection Transgastric biliary drainage through a biliodigestive efferent loop using a lumen-apposing metal stent Clinical safety of a novel over-the-scope gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device for the treatment of upper GI tract lesions: a multicenter experience Novel hemostatic adhesive powder to prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the GI tract: first U.S. multicenter experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1