Suitability mapping for alternative crops: A consistent, high-resolution approach for the United States

Monika E. Shea, Kevin J. Wolz
{"title":"Suitability mapping for alternative crops: A consistent, high-resolution approach for the United States","authors":"Monika E. Shea,&nbsp;Kevin J. Wolz","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2024.100185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Alternative crops are a key aspect of many nature-based solutions in agriculture, and there is a need for more consistent geographic information on biophysical suitability to aid in both farm-level planning and larger-scale analyses. Here we describe an approach for generating consistent, replicable, high-resolution suitability maps for any alternative crop species across the USA. The method employs a criteria-based approach to map potential species performance using a simple suitability index. Criteria for suitable and ideal ranges of values for influential biophysical variables are created using data collected from published sources and are reviewed by experts. Publicly available soil and climate map data are used with the criteria to map suitability for each variable which are integrated into an overall suitability index map. Maps of unsuitable locations are combined to produce a limiting variable map showing which category of environmental variables is most limiting. We demonstrate the application of this approach for two alternative perennial crops, apple (<em>Malus</em> spp.) and Chinese chestnut (<em>Castanea mollissima</em>) and validate its accuracy using known farm locations. Maps of apple and chestnut in four distant study regions show varying patterns of suitability and potential performance depending on the climate and geophysical characteristics of the region. The maps can be used to identify areas of high suitability and compare across regions or between species and be combined with socio-economic and environmental datasets for further analysis. Compared to other approaches, ours can be applied to multiple. species with a range of pre-existing knowledge in a consistent way, allowing for reliable mapping and subsequent research and planning for alternative crops and nature-based solutions in agriculture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature-Based Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411524000764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alternative crops are a key aspect of many nature-based solutions in agriculture, and there is a need for more consistent geographic information on biophysical suitability to aid in both farm-level planning and larger-scale analyses. Here we describe an approach for generating consistent, replicable, high-resolution suitability maps for any alternative crop species across the USA. The method employs a criteria-based approach to map potential species performance using a simple suitability index. Criteria for suitable and ideal ranges of values for influential biophysical variables are created using data collected from published sources and are reviewed by experts. Publicly available soil and climate map data are used with the criteria to map suitability for each variable which are integrated into an overall suitability index map. Maps of unsuitable locations are combined to produce a limiting variable map showing which category of environmental variables is most limiting. We demonstrate the application of this approach for two alternative perennial crops, apple (Malus spp.) and Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima) and validate its accuracy using known farm locations. Maps of apple and chestnut in four distant study regions show varying patterns of suitability and potential performance depending on the climate and geophysical characteristics of the region. The maps can be used to identify areas of high suitability and compare across regions or between species and be combined with socio-economic and environmental datasets for further analysis. Compared to other approaches, ours can be applied to multiple. species with a range of pre-existing knowledge in a consistent way, allowing for reliable mapping and subsequent research and planning for alternative crops and nature-based solutions in agriculture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
替代作物适宜性绘图:美国一致的高分辨率方法
替代作物是许多以自然为基础的农业解决方案的一个关键方面,因此需要更加一致的生物物理适宜性地理信息,以帮助进行农场层面的规划和更大规模的分析。我们在此介绍一种方法,用于为美国各地的任何替代作物物种生成一致、可复制、高分辨率的适宜性地图。该方法采用基于标准的方法,利用简单的适宜性指数绘制潜在物种表现图。利用从公开资料中收集的数据,并经专家审核后,为有影响的生物物理变量创建适宜值和理想值范围的标准。公共可用的土壤和气候地图数据与标准一起用于绘制每个变量的适宜性地图,并将其整合到总体适宜性指数地图中。将不适宜地点的地图结合起来,绘制出限制性变量地图,显示哪一类环境变量的限制性最大。我们演示了这种方法在苹果(Malus spp.)和板栗(Castanea mollissima)这两种多年生作物上的应用,并利用已知的农场地点验证了其准确性。四个遥远研究地区的苹果和板栗地图显示了不同的适宜性和潜在表现模式,这取决于该地区的气候和地球物理特征。这些地图可用于识别高适宜性地区,进行跨地区或物种间的比较,并与社会经济和环境数据集结合起来进行进一步分析。与其他方法相比,我们的方法可以以一致的方式应用于具有一系列已有知识的多个物种,从而为替代作物和基于自然的农业解决方案绘制可靠的地图,并进行后续研究和规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Money talks. A systems perspective on funding and financing barriers to nature-based solutions Exploring social contracts of disaster risk through twitter narratives during a major storm A transformations framework for mainstreaming a nature-based solutions approach Cost-benefit and equity analysis of nature-based solutions in Haiti, India, Indonesia and Uganda “Financing urban Nature-based Solutions (NBS): A literature review from the perspective of funders”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1