All pain and no gain: When goal setting leads to more effort but no gains in test scores

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics of Education Review Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102594
Asad Islam , Sungoh Kwon , Eema Masood , Nishith Prakash , Shwetlena Sabarwal , Deepak Saraswat
{"title":"All pain and no gain: When goal setting leads to more effort but no gains in test scores","authors":"Asad Islam ,&nbsp;Sungoh Kwon ,&nbsp;Eema Masood ,&nbsp;Nishith Prakash ,&nbsp;Shwetlena Sabarwal ,&nbsp;Deepak Saraswat","doi":"10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We conducted an at-scale randomized control trial among 18,281 secondary students in Tanzania to examine the effects of self-set academic goals on students’ efforts and academic outcomes. We also tested the impact of combining goal setting with non-financial rewards. We found that goal-setting had a significant positive effect on self-reported student time use, study effort, and self-discipline, along with a positive but statistically insignificant impact on test performance. We also found that combining goal setting with recognition awards for achieving the goals did not demonstrate any complementary effects. Heterogeneity analysis suggested that goal-setting had a higher impact on test performance for students in the middle of the distribution of baseline learning levels. We also found that the impact of the treatment did not vary significantly across students’ gender, socioeconomic background, or type of chosen goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48261,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Education Review","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102594"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272775724000888","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We conducted an at-scale randomized control trial among 18,281 secondary students in Tanzania to examine the effects of self-set academic goals on students’ efforts and academic outcomes. We also tested the impact of combining goal setting with non-financial rewards. We found that goal-setting had a significant positive effect on self-reported student time use, study effort, and self-discipline, along with a positive but statistically insignificant impact on test performance. We also found that combining goal setting with recognition awards for achieving the goals did not demonstrate any complementary effects. Heterogeneity analysis suggested that goal-setting had a higher impact on test performance for students in the middle of the distribution of baseline learning levels. We also found that the impact of the treatment did not vary significantly across students’ gender, socioeconomic background, or type of chosen goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
只有痛苦,没有收获当目标设定导致付出更多努力但考试成绩却没有提高时
我们在坦桑尼亚的 18281 名中学生中开展了一项大规模随机对照试验,以检验自我设定的学业目标对学生的努力和学业成绩的影响。我们还测试了目标设定与非经济奖励相结合的影响。我们发现,目标设定对学生自我报告的时间使用、学习努力和自律有显著的积极影响,同时对考试成绩也有积极影响,但在统计上并不显著。我们还发现,将目标设定与实现目标的表彰奖励结合起来,并没有显示出任何互补效应。异质性分析表明,目标设定对处于基线学习水平分布中间的学生的考试成绩影响较大。我们还发现,不同性别、社会经济背景或所选目标类型的学生对治疗效果的影响没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
85
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Economics of Education Review publishes research on education policy and finance, human capital production and acquisition, and the returns to human capital. We accept empirical, methodological and theoretical contributions, but the main focus of Economics of Education Review is on applied studies that employ micro data and clear identification strategies. Our goal is to publish innovative, cutting-edge research on the economics of education that is of interest to academics, policymakers and the public. Starting with papers submitted March 1, 2014, the review process for articles submitted to the Economics of Education Review will no longer be double blind. Authors are requested to include a title page with authors'' names and affiliation. Reviewers will continue to be anonymous.
期刊最新文献
The impact of pre-conference advice on academic talk effectiveness Editorial Board Effect of secondary education on cognitive and non-cognitive skills Uncovering the sources of gender earnings gaps among teachers: The role of compensation off the salary schedule When Effective teacher training falls short in the classroom: Evidence from an experiment in primary schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1