Impacts of endogenous opioid blockade and sex on working memory among ad-libitum and abstinent smokers and non-smokers

Ryan Johnson , Briana N. DeAngelis , Motohiro Nakajima , Sharon S. Allen , Mustafa al'Absi
{"title":"Impacts of endogenous opioid blockade and sex on working memory among ad-libitum and abstinent smokers and non-smokers","authors":"Ryan Johnson ,&nbsp;Briana N. DeAngelis ,&nbsp;Motohiro Nakajima ,&nbsp;Sharon S. Allen ,&nbsp;Mustafa al'Absi","doi":"10.1016/j.addicn.2024.100177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Research examining the effects of opioid receptor antagonists on working memory is limited by small sample sizes that are often comprised of only male participants. Moreover, they have yielded mixed findings, and no studies have examined such effects in the context of chronic nicotine use and temporary nicotine withdrawal.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Male and female participants completed two lab visits at which they were administered either 50 mg naltrexone or an identical placebo (one at each lab using double-blind, counterbalanced administration). After a medication absorption period, performance on a mental arithmetic (working memory) task was assessed by number of correct responses, errors, and number of attempts. Participants were either non-smokers or regular smokers who were randomly assigned to use nicotine ad-libitum or to abstain from nicotine for 24 h prior to both lab visits.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The results indicate a significant main effect of opioid blockade on number of correct answers and accuracy rate during the mental arithmetic task, with poorer performance after opioid blockade compared to placebo. In addition, compared to male participants, female participants made fewer answer attempts, had fewer correct answers, and a lower accuracy rate. We did not find evidence of any differences based on smoking group (non-smoker, smoking abstinence, or ad-libitum smoking), nor were there any significant interaction effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings suggest a modulating role of the endogenous opioid system in working memory function. Further investigation is needed to help identify the underlying mechanisms explaining the effects of the endogenous opioid system on working memory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72067,"journal":{"name":"Addiction neuroscience","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772392524000361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Research examining the effects of opioid receptor antagonists on working memory is limited by small sample sizes that are often comprised of only male participants. Moreover, they have yielded mixed findings, and no studies have examined such effects in the context of chronic nicotine use and temporary nicotine withdrawal.

Methods

Male and female participants completed two lab visits at which they were administered either 50 mg naltrexone or an identical placebo (one at each lab using double-blind, counterbalanced administration). After a medication absorption period, performance on a mental arithmetic (working memory) task was assessed by number of correct responses, errors, and number of attempts. Participants were either non-smokers or regular smokers who were randomly assigned to use nicotine ad-libitum or to abstain from nicotine for 24 h prior to both lab visits.

Results

The results indicate a significant main effect of opioid blockade on number of correct answers and accuracy rate during the mental arithmetic task, with poorer performance after opioid blockade compared to placebo. In addition, compared to male participants, female participants made fewer answer attempts, had fewer correct answers, and a lower accuracy rate. We did not find evidence of any differences based on smoking group (non-smoker, smoking abstinence, or ad-libitum smoking), nor were there any significant interaction effects.

Conclusions

The findings suggest a modulating role of the endogenous opioid system in working memory function. Further investigation is needed to help identify the underlying mechanisms explaining the effects of the endogenous opioid system on working memory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内源性阿片类药物阻断和性别对吸烟者和非吸烟者工作记忆的影响
背景有关阿片受体拮抗剂对工作记忆影响的研究受到样本量小的限制,通常只有男性参与者。方法男性和女性参加者完成两次实验室访问,在访问过程中分别服用 50 毫克纳曲酮或相同的安慰剂(每个实验室一次,采用双盲、平衡给药)。药物吸收期结束后,根据正确反应次数、错误次数和尝试次数对心算(工作记忆)任务的表现进行评估。结果表明,阿片类药物阻断对心算任务中的正确答案数和正确率有显著的主效应,与安慰剂相比,阿片类药物阻断后的表现更差。此外,与男性参与者相比,女性参与者尝试回答的次数更少,正确答案更少,准确率也更低。我们没有发现基于吸烟组(不吸烟、戒烟或吸二手烟)的任何差异,也没有发现任何显著的交互效应。研究结果表明,内源性阿片系统对工作记忆功能有调节作用,需要进一步研究,以帮助确定内源性阿片系统对工作记忆影响的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction neuroscience
Addiction neuroscience Neuroscience (General)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
期刊最新文献
Endogenous regulator of G protein signaling 14 (RGS14) blunts cocaine-induced emotionally motivated behaviors in female mice Presence of distinct operant phenotypes and transient withdrawal-induced escalation of operant ethanol intake in female rats Editorial Board Contents Biotin's protective effects against nicotine withdrawal-induced anxiety and depression: Mechanistic insights into serotonin, inflammation, BDNF, and oxidative stress in male rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1