A deformability-based mechanical model for predicting shear strength of FRP-strengthened RC beams failed in concrete cover separation

IF 4.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 MECHANICS Engineering Fracture Mechanics Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110537
Binbin Zhou , Leming Gu , Ruo-Yang Wu , Yao Li , Jie Sheng , Yangqing Liu , Siqi Lu
{"title":"A deformability-based mechanical model for predicting shear strength of FRP-strengthened RC beams failed in concrete cover separation","authors":"Binbin Zhou ,&nbsp;Leming Gu ,&nbsp;Ruo-Yang Wu ,&nbsp;Yao Li ,&nbsp;Jie Sheng ,&nbsp;Yangqing Liu ,&nbsp;Siqi Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Concrete cover separation (CCS) is frequently happened prior to the yielding of steel stirrups in FRP-strengthened RC beams. However, the debonding mechanism and criterion have not been fully understood. In this study, the typical crack types associated with CCS are comprehensively summarized and investigated in terms of profiles and kinematics of crack. The dowel action and dowelling cracks are proved to be the dominant factors causing CCS. Based on the cracking features, the simplified local debonding strength and average shear strength of fracture interface, which constitutes the contribution of concrete to shear capacity of strengthened RC beams, are analytically derived and verified against the available experiments and code provisions. Through regression analysis of 179 collected shear tests, a formulation based on the Critical Shear Crack Theory (CSCT) is presented to assess the deformability of strengthened RC beams governed by CCS. The commonly overlooked actual stress level in steel stirrups is considered as a function of the rotation capacity of beams and assessed based on the Modified Compression Field Theory (MCFT). Validation of this analytical approach, involving comparison against the empirical models and experimental results from 107 specimens, confirms its superior effectiveness and consistency in predicting CCS and shear strength.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11576,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","volume":"311 ","pages":"Article 110537"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794424007008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concrete cover separation (CCS) is frequently happened prior to the yielding of steel stirrups in FRP-strengthened RC beams. However, the debonding mechanism and criterion have not been fully understood. In this study, the typical crack types associated with CCS are comprehensively summarized and investigated in terms of profiles and kinematics of crack. The dowel action and dowelling cracks are proved to be the dominant factors causing CCS. Based on the cracking features, the simplified local debonding strength and average shear strength of fracture interface, which constitutes the contribution of concrete to shear capacity of strengthened RC beams, are analytically derived and verified against the available experiments and code provisions. Through regression analysis of 179 collected shear tests, a formulation based on the Critical Shear Crack Theory (CSCT) is presented to assess the deformability of strengthened RC beams governed by CCS. The commonly overlooked actual stress level in steel stirrups is considered as a function of the rotation capacity of beams and assessed based on the Modified Compression Field Theory (MCFT). Validation of this analytical approach, involving comparison against the empirical models and experimental results from 107 specimens, confirms its superior effectiveness and consistency in predicting CCS and shear strength.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于变形性的力学模型,用于预测混凝土覆盖层分离时失效的 FRP 加固 RC 梁的抗剪强度
在玻璃钢加固的钢筋混凝土梁的钢箍筋屈服之前,经常会发生混凝土保护层分离(CCS)现象。然而,其脱开机理和标准尚未完全清楚。本研究全面总结了与 CCS 相关的典型裂缝类型,并从裂缝的剖面和运动学角度对其进行了研究。事实证明,榫卯作用和榫卯裂缝是导致 CCS 的主要因素。根据裂缝特征,分析推导出了简化的局部脱粘强度和断裂界面平均抗剪强度,它们构成了混凝土对加固后 RC 梁抗剪承载力的贡献,并与现有实验和规范条款进行了验证。通过对收集的 179 项剪切试验进行回归分析,提出了基于临界剪切裂缝理论(CSCT)的公式,以评估受 CCS 控制的加固 RC 梁的变形能力。钢箍筋中通常被忽视的实际应力水平被视为梁旋转能力的函数,并根据修正压缩场理论(MCFT)进行评估。通过与经验模型和 107 个试件的实验结果进行比较,验证了这种分析方法在预测 CCS 和剪切强度方面的优越有效性和一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
606
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: EFM covers a broad range of topics in fracture mechanics to be of interest and use to both researchers and practitioners. Contributions are welcome which address the fracture behavior of conventional engineering material systems as well as newly emerging material systems. Contributions on developments in the areas of mechanics and materials science strongly related to fracture mechanics are also welcome. Papers on fatigue are welcome if they treat the fatigue process using the methods of fracture mechanics.
期刊最新文献
Crack initiation, small crack growth, and stress intensity factor in the very high cycle fatigue (VHCF) of wire arc additive manufactured (WAAM) nickel aluminum bronze (NAB) A fully-coupled damage modelling of hygrothermally aged CFRP open-hole laminate under quasi-static tensile loading Development of crack surface tracking algorithm for explosive fracture simulation with three-dimensional numerical manifold method Unravelling crack tip damage mechanisms: In-situ tensile assessment of Al-6Zn-2.1 Mg-2Cu alloy strengthened by Ti, Zr, and Sc micro-alloying An innovative wide-ranging analytical approach for modelling the bond behaviour of frp-to-substrate joints with an elastic end anchorage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1