IS A MISCARRIAGE AN EMERGENCY? A QUALITATIVE STUDY ASSESSING EMERGENCY MEDICINE PHYSICIANS’ VIEWS TOWARD APPROPRIATE CARE FOR EARLY PREGNANCY LOSS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Contraception Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110627
E Lantos, E McCoy, A Chipman, BT Nguyen, LS Benson
{"title":"IS A MISCARRIAGE AN EMERGENCY? A QUALITATIVE STUDY ASSESSING EMERGENCY MEDICINE PHYSICIANS’ VIEWS TOWARD APPROPRIATE CARE FOR EARLY PREGNANCY LOSS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT","authors":"E Lantos,&nbsp;E McCoy,&nbsp;A Chipman,&nbsp;BT Nguyen,&nbsp;LS Benson","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Patients experiencing early pregnancy loss (EPL) commonly seek care in the emergency department (ED) and often report negative experiences. This qualitative study explores how emergency medicine (EM) physicians view EPL management in the emergency department.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We interviewed 22 EM physicians regarding their treatment of EPL in the ED; we included EM physicians in diverse practice settings, including states with and without abortion restrictions. Semi-structured interviews assessed participants’ current EPL diagnosis and management practices, their attitudes toward what EPL care should be provided in the ED, with attention to the impact of abortion restrictions and differing practice settings. Qualitative data were coded and analyzed for themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most participants reported commonly encountering EPL, though being limited by lack of access to ultrasound diagnosis. Most considered communicating EPL diagnoses as within EM’s scope of practice, but felt discomfort in counseling about management, citing lack of education and uncertainty around which options obstetrician gynecologists (Ob-Gyns) would offer. Most participants only felt comfortable providing expectant management without Ob-Gyn involvement. Time, space, lack of training, scope of practice, and medical-legal concerns were cited as barriers to providing medication and procedural treatment. Many believe EPL management could be improved in the ED but acknowledge competing acuity and lack of education as barriers. Abortion restrictions rarely affected participants' views on miscarriage management, but impacted their ability to provide appropriate care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>EPL is a common ED complaint, but care varies significantly based on practice setting. Standardization and collaboration between Ob-Gyns and EM may improve care for patients experiencing EPL in the ED.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 110627"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424003226","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Patients experiencing early pregnancy loss (EPL) commonly seek care in the emergency department (ED) and often report negative experiences. This qualitative study explores how emergency medicine (EM) physicians view EPL management in the emergency department.

Methods

We interviewed 22 EM physicians regarding their treatment of EPL in the ED; we included EM physicians in diverse practice settings, including states with and without abortion restrictions. Semi-structured interviews assessed participants’ current EPL diagnosis and management practices, their attitudes toward what EPL care should be provided in the ED, with attention to the impact of abortion restrictions and differing practice settings. Qualitative data were coded and analyzed for themes.

Results

Most participants reported commonly encountering EPL, though being limited by lack of access to ultrasound diagnosis. Most considered communicating EPL diagnoses as within EM’s scope of practice, but felt discomfort in counseling about management, citing lack of education and uncertainty around which options obstetrician gynecologists (Ob-Gyns) would offer. Most participants only felt comfortable providing expectant management without Ob-Gyn involvement. Time, space, lack of training, scope of practice, and medical-legal concerns were cited as barriers to providing medication and procedural treatment. Many believe EPL management could be improved in the ED but acknowledge competing acuity and lack of education as barriers. Abortion restrictions rarely affected participants' views on miscarriage management, but impacted their ability to provide appropriate care.

Conclusions

EPL is a common ED complaint, but care varies significantly based on practice setting. Standardization and collaboration between Ob-Gyns and EM may improve care for patients experiencing EPL in the ED.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流产是急症吗?一项定性研究,评估急诊科医生对急诊科早期妊娠流产适当护理的看法
目标经历过早期妊娠损失(EPL)的患者通常会到急诊科(ED)就诊,并经常报告负面经历。本定性研究探讨了急诊医学(EM)医生如何看待急诊科对早孕损失的处理。方法我们就急诊科对早孕损失的处理对 22 名 EM 医生进行了访谈;访谈对象包括不同执业环境下的 EM 医生,包括有堕胎限制和无堕胎限制的州。半结构式访谈评估了参与者目前的 EPL 诊断和管理实践,以及他们对急诊科应提供哪些 EPL 护理的态度,并关注了堕胎限制和不同实践环境的影响。对定性数据进行了编码和主题分析。结果大多数参与者表示,他们通常会遇到 EPL,但由于无法获得超声波诊断而受到限制。大多数人认为,传达 EPL 诊断结果属于急诊科的工作范围,但在提供处理建议时感到不适,因为他们缺乏教育,也不确定妇产科医生(Ob-Gyns)会提供哪些选择。大多数参与者认为,只有在没有妇产科医生参与的情况下,才能提供预产期管理。时间、空间、缺乏培训、执业范围和医疗法律问题被认为是提供药物和程序性治疗的障碍。许多人认为,急诊室的待产处理工作可以得到改善,但也承认竞争激烈和缺乏教育是障碍。流产限制很少影响参与者对流产管理的看法,但影响了他们提供适当护理的能力。妇产科医生和急诊科医生之间的标准化合作可改善急诊室对流产患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Copyright info/Contents Editorial Board Copyright info/Contents Society of Family Planning Committee Statement: Contraception and body weight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1