EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THE ESTETROL/DROSPIRENONE ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE IN US STUDY PARTICIPANTS WITH AND WITHOUT OBESITY

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Contraception Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110562
AD Beasley, T Kimble, B Kaneshiro, R Maamari, JM Foidart, MD Creinin
{"title":"EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THE ESTETROL/DROSPIRENONE ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE IN US STUDY PARTICIPANTS WITH AND WITHOUT OBESITY","authors":"AD Beasley,&nbsp;T Kimble,&nbsp;B Kaneshiro,&nbsp;R Maamari,&nbsp;JM Foidart,&nbsp;MD Creinin","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to compare contraceptive efficacy and safety of estetrol 15 mg/drospirenone 3 mg in US study participants with and without obesity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed US population data from a phase 3 trial of estetrol/drospirenone use for up to 13 cycles. The study enrolled 1,864 healthy US and Canadian participants 16-50 years old with body mass index (BMI) 18-35 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. We evaluated efficacy (Pearl Index, pregnancies/100-person-years) in participants 16-35 years and safety (adverse events [AEs]) in all participants, with obesity defined as BMI≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 1,712 (91.8%) US participants; 1,531(89.4%) were 16-35 years. BMIs for 418 (24.4%) participants with obesity were 32.6±1.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> overall and 32.6±1.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup> for 365 participants aged 16-35. For participants without obesity, BMIs were 23.9±3.2 kg/m2 and 23.8±3.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Pearl indices for participants with and without obesity were 3.04 (95% CI, 1.116.61) and 2.86 (95% CI, 1.754.42), respectively (p&gt;0.05). AEs were reported by 418 (56.0%) and 670 (51.8%) of participants with and without obesity (p=0.13). The most common AE that differed between groups was weight gain (5.3% vs 2.7%, respectively, p=0.02). Two serious AEs (1 per group) were considered study treatment related. Discontinuation for an AE occurred in 40(9.6%) and 116 (9.0%), respectively (p=0.7).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Contraceptive efficacy did not differ for US estetrol/drospirenone users with and without obesity. Although participants with obesity more frequently report weight gain, overall AE discontinuation rates did not differ. These results demonstrate a favorable efficacy and safety profile of estetrol/drospirenone users with obesity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424002579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

We aimed to compare contraceptive efficacy and safety of estetrol 15 mg/drospirenone 3 mg in US study participants with and without obesity.

Methods

We analyzed US population data from a phase 3 trial of estetrol/drospirenone use for up to 13 cycles. The study enrolled 1,864 healthy US and Canadian participants 16-50 years old with body mass index (BMI) 18-35 kg/m2. We evaluated efficacy (Pearl Index, pregnancies/100-person-years) in participants 16-35 years and safety (adverse events [AEs]) in all participants, with obesity defined as BMI≥30 kg/m2.

Results

We included 1,712 (91.8%) US participants; 1,531(89.4%) were 16-35 years. BMIs for 418 (24.4%) participants with obesity were 32.6±1.7 kg/m2 overall and 32.6±1.8 kg/m2 for 365 participants aged 16-35. For participants without obesity, BMIs were 23.9±3.2 kg/m2 and 23.8±3.3 kg/m2, respectively. Pearl indices for participants with and without obesity were 3.04 (95% CI, 1.116.61) and 2.86 (95% CI, 1.754.42), respectively (p>0.05). AEs were reported by 418 (56.0%) and 670 (51.8%) of participants with and without obesity (p=0.13). The most common AE that differed between groups was weight gain (5.3% vs 2.7%, respectively, p=0.02). Two serious AEs (1 per group) were considered study treatment related. Discontinuation for an AE occurred in 40(9.6%) and 116 (9.0%), respectively (p=0.7).

Conclusions

Contraceptive efficacy did not differ for US estetrol/drospirenone users with and without obesity. Although participants with obesity more frequently report weight gain, overall AE discontinuation rates did not differ. These results demonstrate a favorable efficacy and safety profile of estetrol/drospirenone users with obesity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雌二醇/屈螺酮口服避孕药对肥胖症和非肥胖症美国研究参与者的疗效和安全性
目的我们旨在比较雌烯雌酚 15 毫克/屈螺酮 3 毫克在有肥胖症和无肥胖症的美国研究参与者中的避孕效果和安全性。方法我们分析了使用雌烯雌酚/屈螺酮长达 13 个周期的 3 期试验中的美国人群数据。这项研究招募了 1864 名美国和加拿大的健康参与者,他们的年龄在 16-50 岁之间,体重指数(BMI)为 18-35 kg/m2。我们评估了 16-35 岁参与者的疗效(珍珠指数,怀孕/100 人-年)和所有参与者的安全性(不良事件 [AE]),肥胖定义为 BMI≥30 kg/m2。418名(24.4%)肥胖参与者的总体体重指数为32.6±1.7 kg/m2,365名16-35岁参与者的总体体重指数为32.6±1.8 kg/m2。没有肥胖症的参与者的体重指数分别为 23.9±3.2 kg/m2 和 23.8±3.3 kg/m2。有肥胖症和无肥胖症的参与者的珍珠指数分别为 3.04(95% CI,1.116.61)和 2.86(95% CI,1.754.42)(p>0.05)。有肥胖症和无肥胖症的参与者中,分别有 418 人(56.0%)和 670 人(51.8%)报告了 AE(P=0.13)。组间最常见的不良反应是体重增加(分别为 5.3% 和 2.7%,P=0.02)。有两例严重 AE(每组 1 例)被认为与研究治疗有关。分别有 40 例(9.6%)和 116 例(9.0%)患者因 AE 而停药(P=0.7)。虽然肥胖症患者报告体重增加的频率更高,但总体AE停药率并无差异。这些结果表明,肥胖的雌烯醇/屈螺酮使用者具有良好的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Featured research at the 2024 Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting 2024 IMPROVING CARE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH HIGHER BODY MASS INDEX (BMI) UNDERGOING INDUCTION TERMINATION FULFILLING AN UNMET NEED: PATIENT PERSPECTIVES ON INTEGRATING FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES INTO OFFICE-BASED ADDICTION THERAPY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1