“I TAKE IT WHEN I WANT IT”: EXPLORING USE OF ADVANCE PROVISION OF ULIPRISTAL ACETATE AND ITS PROMOTION OF REPRODUCTIVE AUTONOMY FOR POSTPARTUM PATIENTS
CF Lu, M Serino, L Wegner, L Patterson, M Gurra, A Turner
{"title":"“I TAKE IT WHEN I WANT IT”: EXPLORING USE OF ADVANCE PROVISION OF ULIPRISTAL ACETATE AND ITS PROMOTION OF REPRODUCTIVE AUTONOMY FOR POSTPARTUM PATIENTS","authors":"CF Lu, M Serino, L Wegner, L Patterson, M Gurra, A Turner","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Emergency contraception remains underutilized with barriers to access. We assess how advance provision of ulipristal acetate (UA) facilitates use and expands reproductive autonomy for postpartum people declining high-efficacy contraception</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants choosing lower-efficacy contraception were recruited postpartum and received UA prior to discharge (n=73). Surveys were completed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postpartum. Univariate logistic regression models examined the association between UA use and participant demographics. In-depth interviews were conducted at 6 weeks with early UA users and at 6 months with all participants, exploring topics around contraception and reproductive autonomy. Reflexivity and memo-writing enhanced data collection. Interviews were inductively coded in NVivo 12 and analyzed using grounded theory.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve participants (16%) reported using UA, with a mean of 2.6 UA uses per participant (SD: 2.4). Those who identified as Latinx had 5.3 greater odds of using UA (95% CI: [1.41, 20.5], p=0.013). Participants with lower income (<$100,000) also had higher odds of using UA (OR: 8.40, 95% CI: [1.37, 163], p=0.019). Semi-structured interviews (n=19) revealed strong approval of advance provision of UA. Participants endorsed improved access, ease and confidence in use, and greater control over their reproductive decision-making. This was especially relevant for those with prior negative experiences with contraception and/or unwanted or coercive counseling from providers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Postpartum patients choosing lower-efficacy contraception valued advance provision of UA and reflected on UA as a user-controlled option, bolstering reproductive autonomy. Advance provision of UA can be a useful intervention to increase contraceptive access for postpartum patients prior to discharge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 110636"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424003317","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Emergency contraception remains underutilized with barriers to access. We assess how advance provision of ulipristal acetate (UA) facilitates use and expands reproductive autonomy for postpartum people declining high-efficacy contraception
Methods
Participants choosing lower-efficacy contraception were recruited postpartum and received UA prior to discharge (n=73). Surveys were completed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postpartum. Univariate logistic regression models examined the association between UA use and participant demographics. In-depth interviews were conducted at 6 weeks with early UA users and at 6 months with all participants, exploring topics around contraception and reproductive autonomy. Reflexivity and memo-writing enhanced data collection. Interviews were inductively coded in NVivo 12 and analyzed using grounded theory.
Results
Twelve participants (16%) reported using UA, with a mean of 2.6 UA uses per participant (SD: 2.4). Those who identified as Latinx had 5.3 greater odds of using UA (95% CI: [1.41, 20.5], p=0.013). Participants with lower income (<$100,000) also had higher odds of using UA (OR: 8.40, 95% CI: [1.37, 163], p=0.019). Semi-structured interviews (n=19) revealed strong approval of advance provision of UA. Participants endorsed improved access, ease and confidence in use, and greater control over their reproductive decision-making. This was especially relevant for those with prior negative experiences with contraception and/or unwanted or coercive counseling from providers.
Conclusions
Postpartum patients choosing lower-efficacy contraception valued advance provision of UA and reflected on UA as a user-controlled option, bolstering reproductive autonomy. Advance provision of UA can be a useful intervention to increase contraceptive access for postpartum patients prior to discharge.
期刊介绍:
Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.