BELIEFS ABOUT TRUSTING WOMEN TO MAKE THEIR OWN ABORTION DECISIONS AND PUNISHMENT FOR SELF-MANAGED MEDICATION ABORTION IN A NATIONALLY REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Contraception Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110613
A Becker, R Schroeder, L Ralph, S Kaller, MA Biggs
{"title":"BELIEFS ABOUT TRUSTING WOMEN TO MAKE THEIR OWN ABORTION DECISIONS AND PUNISHMENT FOR SELF-MANAGED MEDICATION ABORTION IN A NATIONALLY REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE","authors":"A Becker,&nbsp;R Schroeder,&nbsp;L Ralph,&nbsp;S Kaller,&nbsp;MA Biggs","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Given the anticipated increase in self-managed medication abortion due to decreased access to facility-based abortion in the US after <em>Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization,</em> we examined lay attitudes regarding trusting pregnant people to make their own abortion decisions and whether trusting women is associated with beliefs about punishment for self-managed medication abortion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of 7,148 people assigned female at birth (AFAB), aged 15–49 from May to July 2023, using a probability-based panel. Participants were asked to indicate whether they agree or disagree that “Most women are capable of making the best decision on abortion for themselves.” We calculated a mean Trust women score (1–5, 5=higher trust). We conducted multivariable regression to assess factors associated with trusting women and whether trusting women was associated with support for reporting people to Child Protective Services or the police, having them pay a fine, or jailing those who self-managed a medication abortion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean Trust Women score was 2.6 (SD= 1.24). Respondents were evenly split between trusting women (50.36% agreed/strongly agreed, 49.64% disagreed, strongly disagreed, or neither agreed nor disagreed). Identifying as a gender or sexual minority, as Democrat, as non-Hispanic Black, and supportive of legal access to in-clinic abortion were associated with higher odds in trusting women to make abortion decisions. Trusting women was associated with decreased support for all forms of punishment for self-managed medication abortion.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Beliefs about trusting women are polarized, with only half of AFAB people reporting trusting women to make their own abortion decisions; these attitudes are associated with beliefs about punishing those who self-manage a medication abortion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424003081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Given the anticipated increase in self-managed medication abortion due to decreased access to facility-based abortion in the US after Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, we examined lay attitudes regarding trusting pregnant people to make their own abortion decisions and whether trusting women is associated with beliefs about punishment for self-managed medication abortion.

Methods

We conducted a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of 7,148 people assigned female at birth (AFAB), aged 15–49 from May to July 2023, using a probability-based panel. Participants were asked to indicate whether they agree or disagree that “Most women are capable of making the best decision on abortion for themselves.” We calculated a mean Trust women score (1–5, 5=higher trust). We conducted multivariable regression to assess factors associated with trusting women and whether trusting women was associated with support for reporting people to Child Protective Services or the police, having them pay a fine, or jailing those who self-managed a medication abortion.

Results

The mean Trust Women score was 2.6 (SD= 1.24). Respondents were evenly split between trusting women (50.36% agreed/strongly agreed, 49.64% disagreed, strongly disagreed, or neither agreed nor disagreed). Identifying as a gender or sexual minority, as Democrat, as non-Hispanic Black, and supportive of legal access to in-clinic abortion were associated with higher odds in trusting women to make abortion decisions. Trusting women was associated with decreased support for all forms of punishment for self-managed medication abortion.

Conclusions

Beliefs about trusting women are polarized, with only half of AFAB people reporting trusting women to make their own abortion decisions; these attitudes are associated with beliefs about punishing those who self-manage a medication abortion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全国代表性样本中,关于信任妇女自行做出堕胎决定的信念以及对自我管理的药物流产的惩罚情况
目标鉴于美国在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案之后,由于设施内堕胎的机会减少,自我管理的药物流产预计会增加,我们研究了非专业人士对于信任孕妇自己做出堕胎决定的态度,以及信任女性是否与自我管理药物流产的惩罚信念相关。调查要求参与者回答是否同意 "大多数女性有能力为自己做出堕胎的最佳决定"。我们计算了 "信任女性 "的平均得分(1-5,5=信任度更高)。我们进行了多变量回归,以评估与信任女性相关的因素,以及信任女性是否与支持向儿童保护服务机构或警方举报、让她们支付罚款或监禁自行管理药物流产者相关。受访者对女性的信任度各占一半(50.36% 表示同意/非常同意,49.64% 表示不同意、非常不同意或既不同意也不不同意)。性别或性少数群体、民主党人、非西班牙裔黑人以及支持合法获得诊所内堕胎服务的受访者信任女性做出堕胎决定的几率较高。信任妇女与减少对自行管理药物流产的各种形式惩罚的支持有关。结论 信任妇女的信念是两极分化的,只有一半的非洲裔美国人报告说信任妇女能做出自己的流产决定;这些态度与惩罚自行管理药物流产者的信念有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Featured research at the 2024 Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting 2024 IMPROVING CARE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH HIGHER BODY MASS INDEX (BMI) UNDERGOING INDUCTION TERMINATION FULFILLING AN UNMET NEED: PATIENT PERSPECTIVES ON INTEGRATING FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES INTO OFFICE-BASED ADDICTION THERAPY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1