COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH MIFEPRISTONE USE FOR DILATION AND EVACUATION ABORTION PROCEDURES BETWEEN 22 AND 24 WEEKS’ GESTATION

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Contraception Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110606
MB Wergeles, P Lohr, R Scott, M Lewandowska, A Andreeva
{"title":"COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH MIFEPRISTONE USE FOR DILATION AND EVACUATION ABORTION PROCEDURES BETWEEN 22 AND 24 WEEKS’ GESTATION","authors":"MB Wergeles,&nbsp;P Lohr,&nbsp;R Scott,&nbsp;M Lewandowska,&nbsp;A Andreeva","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Dilation and evacuation is the most common method of procedural abortion after 20 weeks’ gestation. Adequate cervical dilation is essential for safe dilation and evacuation. In 2017, the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) added mifepristone to their regimen of osmotic dilators for cervical ripening before dilation and evacuation. This retrospective study analyzed the risk for complications associated with the use of mifepristone for cervical ripening.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>BPAS provided data which included dilation and evacuation procedures that occurred between 22 weeks’ and 23 weeks and 6 days’ gestation, between February 2012 and February 2017 (osmotic dilators only), and November 2017 to November 2022 (mifepristone and osmotic dilators). Using time as a proxy for mifepristone use, the association between mifepristone use and dilation and evacuation complications was established. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the odds for complications with and without mifepristone use while controlling for potential confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 6,516 dilation and evacuation procedures at BPAS during this time. Those who received mifepristone were more likely to experience any complication (OR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.62, 3.54). They also had higher odds of bleeding (OR: 3.08, 95% CI: 1.12, 8.48). Odds for cervical injury (OR: 2.21, 95% CI: 0.84, 5.80) and infection (OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 0.46, 7.69) were not different between those who did and did not receive mifepristone.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The addition of mifepristone to osmotic dilators was associated with an increase in the odds of complications of dilation and evacuation, without attenuating the risk of complications related to cervical dilation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424003019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Dilation and evacuation is the most common method of procedural abortion after 20 weeks’ gestation. Adequate cervical dilation is essential for safe dilation and evacuation. In 2017, the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) added mifepristone to their regimen of osmotic dilators for cervical ripening before dilation and evacuation. This retrospective study analyzed the risk for complications associated with the use of mifepristone for cervical ripening.

Methods

BPAS provided data which included dilation and evacuation procedures that occurred between 22 weeks’ and 23 weeks and 6 days’ gestation, between February 2012 and February 2017 (osmotic dilators only), and November 2017 to November 2022 (mifepristone and osmotic dilators). Using time as a proxy for mifepristone use, the association between mifepristone use and dilation and evacuation complications was established. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the odds for complications with and without mifepristone use while controlling for potential confounders.

Results

There were 6,516 dilation and evacuation procedures at BPAS during this time. Those who received mifepristone were more likely to experience any complication (OR: 2.40, 95% CI: 1.62, 3.54). They also had higher odds of bleeding (OR: 3.08, 95% CI: 1.12, 8.48). Odds for cervical injury (OR: 2.21, 95% CI: 0.84, 5.80) and infection (OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 0.46, 7.69) were not different between those who did and did not receive mifepristone.

Conclusions

The addition of mifepristone to osmotic dilators was associated with an increase in the odds of complications of dilation and evacuation, without attenuating the risk of complications related to cervical dilation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在妊娠 22 至 24 周之间使用米非司酮进行扩张和排空人工流产手术的相关并发症
目的:扩张和排空是妊娠 20 周后最常见的程序性人工流产方法。充分扩张宫颈对安全扩张和排空至关重要。2017 年,英国妊娠咨询服务机构(BPAS)将米非司酮添加到渗透性扩张剂方案中,用于扩张和排空前的宫颈成熟。这项回顾性研究分析了与使用米非司酮进行宫颈成熟相关的并发症风险。方法英国妊娠咨询服务提供的数据包括2012年2月至2017年2月(仅使用渗透性扩张器)和2017年11月至2022年11月(米非司酮和渗透性扩张器)期间发生在妊娠22周至23周6天之间的扩张和排空手术。以时间作为米非司酮使用的替代指标,确定了米非司酮使用与扩张和排空并发症之间的关联。在控制潜在混杂因素的情况下,采用多变量逻辑回归法计算使用和未使用米非司酮的并发症发生几率。使用米非司酮的患者更有可能出现任何并发症(OR:2.40,95% CI:1.62,3.54)。他们出血的几率也更高(OR:3.08,95% CI:1.12,8.48)。宫颈损伤(OR:2.21,95% CI:0.84,5.80)和感染(OR:1.89,95% CI:0.46,7.69)的几率在使用和未使用米非司酮的患者之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Featured research at the 2024 Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting 2024 IMPROVING CARE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH HIGHER BODY MASS INDEX (BMI) UNDERGOING INDUCTION TERMINATION FULFILLING AN UNMET NEED: PATIENT PERSPECTIVES ON INTEGRATING FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES INTO OFFICE-BASED ADDICTION THERAPY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1