Do LSTM memory states reflect the relationships in reduced-complexity sandy shoreline models

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Environmental Modelling & Software Pub Date : 2024-09-30 DOI:10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106236
Kit Calcraft , Kristen D. Splinter , Joshua A. Simmons , Lucy A. Marshall
{"title":"Do LSTM memory states reflect the relationships in reduced-complexity sandy shoreline models","authors":"Kit Calcraft ,&nbsp;Kristen D. Splinter ,&nbsp;Joshua A. Simmons ,&nbsp;Lucy A. Marshall","doi":"10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Equilibrium-based models are a transparent method of modelling shoreline change, though often too simplistic to capture complex dynamics. Conversely, deep learning methodologies offer greater predictive power at the expense of transparency. In this research we scrutinize the internal workings of an LSTM shoreline model. A regression-based probe is used to show that cell state vectors, responsible for past-to-future information flow, autonomously generate equilibrium-like information akin to the physics-based equilibrium term of the ShoreFor model, <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>Ω</mi><mrow><mi>e</mi><mi>q</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>. The variation in probe skill throughout training is tracked to show that at 5 of 6 transects, the LSTM was able to meaningfully acquire equilibrium information (<em>ΣΔR</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.3–0.6). The results of this work offer evidence that an LSTM may model shoreline change with internal methods that are consistent with the current understanding of coastal shoreline dynamics. These physically meaningful representations emphasize the importance of co-evolution between machine learning and physics-based approaches moving forward.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":310,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Modelling & Software","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 106236"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Modelling & Software","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815224002974","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Equilibrium-based models are a transparent method of modelling shoreline change, though often too simplistic to capture complex dynamics. Conversely, deep learning methodologies offer greater predictive power at the expense of transparency. In this research we scrutinize the internal workings of an LSTM shoreline model. A regression-based probe is used to show that cell state vectors, responsible for past-to-future information flow, autonomously generate equilibrium-like information akin to the physics-based equilibrium term of the ShoreFor model, Ωeq. The variation in probe skill throughout training is tracked to show that at 5 of 6 transects, the LSTM was able to meaningfully acquire equilibrium information (ΣΔR2 = 0.3–0.6). The results of this work offer evidence that an LSTM may model shoreline change with internal methods that are consistent with the current understanding of coastal shoreline dynamics. These physically meaningful representations emphasize the importance of co-evolution between machine learning and physics-based approaches moving forward.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LSTM 记忆状态是否反映了复杂度降低的沙质海岸线模型中的关系
基于平衡的模型是模拟海岸线变化的一种透明方法,但往往过于简单,无法捕捉复杂的动态变化。与此相反,深度学习方法以牺牲透明度为代价,却能提供更强的预测能力。在这项研究中,我们仔细研究了 LSTM 海岸线模型的内部运作。我们使用基于回归的探针来证明,负责过去到未来信息流的细胞状态向量会自主生成类似于 ShoreFor 模型中基于物理学的平衡项 Ωeq 的平衡信息。对整个训练过程中探测技能的变化进行了跟踪,结果表明,在 6 个横断面中的 5 个横断面,LSTM 能够有意义地获取平衡信息(ΣΔR2 = 0.3-0.6)。这项工作的结果证明,LSTM 可以用内部方法模拟海岸线变化,这与目前对海岸线动态的理解是一致的。这些具有物理意义的表征强调了机器学习与基于物理的方法共同进化的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Modelling & Software
Environmental Modelling & Software 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
241
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Modelling & Software publishes contributions, in the form of research articles, reviews and short communications, on recent advances in environmental modelling and/or software. The aim is to improve our capacity to represent, understand, predict or manage the behaviour of environmental systems at all practical scales, and to communicate those improvements to a wide scientific and professional audience.
期刊最新文献
Probability analysis of shallow landslides in varying vegetation zones with random soil grain-size distribution Variable sensitivity analysis in groundwater level projections under climate change adopting a hybrid machine learning algorithm Taxonomy of purposes, methods, and recommendations for vulnerability analysis Canopy height Mapper: A google earth engine application for predicting global canopy heights combining GEDI with multi-source data Integrated STL-DBSCAN algorithm for online hydrological and water quality monitoring data cleaning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1