Will Sperduto MD , Molly M. Voss BS , Brady Laughlin MD , Diego A.S. Toesca MD , William W. Wong MD , Sameer R. Keole MD, FASTRO , Jean-Claude M. Rwigema MD , Nathan Y. Yu MD , Steven E. Schild MD , Sarah E. James MD, PhD , Thomas B. Daniels MD , Todd A. DeWees PhD , Carlos E. Vargas MD
{"title":"Five-Year Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-Based Outcomes of Spot-Scanning Proton Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single Institution Experience","authors":"Will Sperduto MD , Molly M. Voss BS , Brady Laughlin MD , Diego A.S. Toesca MD , William W. Wong MD , Sameer R. Keole MD, FASTRO , Jean-Claude M. Rwigema MD , Nathan Y. Yu MD , Steven E. Schild MD , Sarah E. James MD, PhD , Thomas B. Daniels MD , Todd A. DeWees PhD , Carlos E. Vargas MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>We report 5-year oncologic outcomes of a prospective series of patients with prostate cancer treated with spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>A prospective registry identified patients with prostate cancer treated with SSPT between January 2016 and December 2018. Five-year overall survival, local control, biochemical failure, regional and distant failures, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Biochemical failure was defined as rise in prostate-specific antigen ≥ 2.0 ng/mL above nadir prostate-specific antigen. Baseline-adjusted toxicities were assigned using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With a median follow-up of 4.4 years, 284 patients with prostate cancer were treated with SSPT. Median total radiation dose was 79.2 Gy over 44 fractions, 70 Gy over 28 fractions, and 38 Gy over 5 fractions for conventional fractionation (CF), hypofractionation (HF), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), respectively. Biochemical failure rate for all patients was 6.7%. Five-year local control rates for CF, HF, and SBRT were 100%, 100%, and 97.3%, respectively (<em>P</em> = .07). Regional recurrences occurred in 12 (4.2%) patients: 8 treated with CF, 2 with HF, and 2 with SBRT (<em>P</em> = .62). Distant failures occurred in 12 patients (4.2%): 5 treated with CF, 7 with HF, and none with SBRT (<em>P</em> = .05). Five-year overall survival for patients treated with CF, HF, and SBRT SSPT were 88.1%, 86.1%, and 97.2%, respectively (<em>P</em> = .1). Acute and chronic grade 2+ gastrointestinal AEs occurred in 8 (2.8%) and 51 (18.0%) patients, respectively. Acute and chronic grade 3+ gastrointestinal AEs occurred in 3 (1.1%) and 4 (1.4%) patients, respectively. Acute and chronic grade 2+ genitourinary-related AEs were observed in 71 (25%) and 63 (22.2%) patients, respectively. Acute and chronic grade 3+ genitourinary toxicity were observed in 3 (1.1%) and 6 (2.1%) patients, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SSPT provides high local control rates and excellent oncologic outcomes across different fractionation schedules with low long-term AE rates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 11","pages":"Article 101639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424002021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
We report 5-year oncologic outcomes of a prospective series of patients with prostate cancer treated with spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT).
Methods and Materials
A prospective registry identified patients with prostate cancer treated with SSPT between January 2016 and December 2018. Five-year overall survival, local control, biochemical failure, regional and distant failures, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Biochemical failure was defined as rise in prostate-specific antigen ≥ 2.0 ng/mL above nadir prostate-specific antigen. Baseline-adjusted toxicities were assigned using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.
Results
With a median follow-up of 4.4 years, 284 patients with prostate cancer were treated with SSPT. Median total radiation dose was 79.2 Gy over 44 fractions, 70 Gy over 28 fractions, and 38 Gy over 5 fractions for conventional fractionation (CF), hypofractionation (HF), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), respectively. Biochemical failure rate for all patients was 6.7%. Five-year local control rates for CF, HF, and SBRT were 100%, 100%, and 97.3%, respectively (P = .07). Regional recurrences occurred in 12 (4.2%) patients: 8 treated with CF, 2 with HF, and 2 with SBRT (P = .62). Distant failures occurred in 12 patients (4.2%): 5 treated with CF, 7 with HF, and none with SBRT (P = .05). Five-year overall survival for patients treated with CF, HF, and SBRT SSPT were 88.1%, 86.1%, and 97.2%, respectively (P = .1). Acute and chronic grade 2+ gastrointestinal AEs occurred in 8 (2.8%) and 51 (18.0%) patients, respectively. Acute and chronic grade 3+ gastrointestinal AEs occurred in 3 (1.1%) and 4 (1.4%) patients, respectively. Acute and chronic grade 2+ genitourinary-related AEs were observed in 71 (25%) and 63 (22.2%) patients, respectively. Acute and chronic grade 3+ genitourinary toxicity were observed in 3 (1.1%) and 6 (2.1%) patients, respectively.
Conclusions
SSPT provides high local control rates and excellent oncologic outcomes across different fractionation schedules with low long-term AE rates.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.