Climate emotions, parenting plans, and racial difference in the United States

Jade S. Sasser , Emily Klancher Merchant
{"title":"Climate emotions, parenting plans, and racial difference in the United States","authors":"Jade S. Sasser ,&nbsp;Emily Klancher Merchant","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Increasing attention is being paid to the relationship between climate change, emotional and mental distress, and feelings about raising children. These studies often overlook the role of demographics, race in particular, despite evidence that racial minority groups in the U.S. experience more detrimental climate impacts and express more climate concern than do white communities. This survey was conducted to elucidate the relationship between race, climate emotions, and parenting plans in the U.S.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We surveyed 2489 people in the U.S. between the ages of 22 and 35 in September 2021. Because we were interested in the role of race, we oversampled those who identified as non-white/people of color. The survey assessed participants’ emotions with respect to climate change, and their emotions with respect to birthing and raising children (parenting) in the context of climate change.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nonwhite respondents were more likely than white respondents to report feeling traumatized as a response to climate change, and to plan to have fewer future children than they wanted as a result of their climate-related emotions. They were also more likely to report feeling more optimistic and hopeful in response to climate change and in response to raising existing children in the context of climate change. White women were least likely to report any positive emotions with respect to parenting during climate change. White men were most likely to report non-feeling emotions such as numbness, indifference, or being checked out. Christian respondents were more likely to report feeling positive emotions overall.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights race as a statistically significant factor in the reporting of climate emotions and parenting plans. It demonstrates that climate change has contradictory impacts on the emotions of nonwhite people of color, while having a negative impact on childbearing plans. We call for further research into the role of race in climate-related emotions and parenting plans, particularly with respect to the impacts of traumatized feelings, as well as the roles of religion and positive emotions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266727822400049X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Increasing attention is being paid to the relationship between climate change, emotional and mental distress, and feelings about raising children. These studies often overlook the role of demographics, race in particular, despite evidence that racial minority groups in the U.S. experience more detrimental climate impacts and express more climate concern than do white communities. This survey was conducted to elucidate the relationship between race, climate emotions, and parenting plans in the U.S.

Methods

We surveyed 2489 people in the U.S. between the ages of 22 and 35 in September 2021. Because we were interested in the role of race, we oversampled those who identified as non-white/people of color. The survey assessed participants’ emotions with respect to climate change, and their emotions with respect to birthing and raising children (parenting) in the context of climate change.

Results

Nonwhite respondents were more likely than white respondents to report feeling traumatized as a response to climate change, and to plan to have fewer future children than they wanted as a result of their climate-related emotions. They were also more likely to report feeling more optimistic and hopeful in response to climate change and in response to raising existing children in the context of climate change. White women were least likely to report any positive emotions with respect to parenting during climate change. White men were most likely to report non-feeling emotions such as numbness, indifference, or being checked out. Christian respondents were more likely to report feeling positive emotions overall.

Conclusion

This study highlights race as a statistically significant factor in the reporting of climate emotions and parenting plans. It demonstrates that climate change has contradictory impacts on the emotions of nonwhite people of color, while having a negative impact on childbearing plans. We call for further research into the role of race in climate-related emotions and parenting plans, particularly with respect to the impacts of traumatized feelings, as well as the roles of religion and positive emotions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国的气候情绪、育儿计划和种族差异
导言越来越多的人开始关注气候变化、情绪和精神痛苦以及抚养子女的感受之间的关系。尽管有证据表明,与白人社区相比,美国的少数种族群体受到了更多不利的气候影响,并表达了更多的气候担忧,但这些研究往往忽视了人口统计学的作用,尤其是种族的作用。我们在 2021 年 9 月对美国 22 至 35 岁的 2489 人进行了调查。因为我们对种族的作用很感兴趣,所以我们对那些被认定为非白人/有色人种的人进行了过度抽样调查。调查评估了参与者对气候变化的情绪,以及他们在气候变化背景下生育和养育子女(为人父母)的情绪。结果非白人受访者比白人受访者更有可能表示因气候变化而感到精神创伤,并因与气候有关的情绪而计划减少未来生育子女的数量。她们也更有可能报告说,在应对气候变化和在气候变化背景下抚养现有子女方面,她们感到更加乐观和充满希望。白人妇女最不可能报告在气候变化期间养育子女方面的任何积极情绪。白人男性最有可能报告出麻木、漠不关心或退缩等非感受性情绪。这项研究强调了种族是影响气候情绪报告和养育计划的一个重要统计因素。它表明,气候变化对非白人有色人种的情绪产生了相互矛盾的影响,同时对育儿计划产生了负面影响。我们呼吁进一步研究种族在气候相关情绪和育儿计划中的作用,尤其是创伤情绪的影响,以及宗教和积极情绪的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
期刊最新文献
Climate change, modern slavery, and its impact on health – A youth perspective and global call to action Corrigendum to “Climate change and women's health in the United States: Impacts and opportunities” [J Clim Change Health 8C (2022) 100169] Pediatric climate distress: A scoping review and clinical resource Development and validation of a climate change version of the man-made disaster-related distress scale (CC-MMDS) A qualitative study of what motivates, facilitates, and hinders climate-engaged healthcare trainees to advance healthcare sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1