Capturing pharmacists’ perspectives on the value, risks, and applications of ChatGPT in pharmacy practice: A qualitative study

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100518
Ammar Abdulrahman Jairoun , Sabaa Saleh Al-Hemyari , Moyad Shahwan , Ghala Rashid Alnuaimi , Nihal Ibrahim , Ammar Ali Saleh Jaber
{"title":"Capturing pharmacists’ perspectives on the value, risks, and applications of ChatGPT in pharmacy practice: A qualitative study","authors":"Ammar Abdulrahman Jairoun ,&nbsp;Sabaa Saleh Al-Hemyari ,&nbsp;Moyad Shahwan ,&nbsp;Ghala Rashid Alnuaimi ,&nbsp;Nihal Ibrahim ,&nbsp;Ammar Ali Saleh Jaber","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate the pharmacists' perspectives on benefits and risks of using ChatGPT in pharmacy practice and explore how this disruptive and ground-breaking technology can be effectively integrated.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><div>A qualitative approach that draws data from licensed pharmacists using semi-structured interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most participants felt ChatGPT could enhance the compliance, use, management, safety, adherence to medication, medication counseling, minimize medication errors, and streamline medication dispensing. However, when Chat-GPT has limited information and relies on obsolete medication databases, it risks providing inaccurate recommendations and inadequate medication details. Also, most participants highlighted the difficulty in interpreting ambiguous patient input or drug descriptions when using the application.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite its potential, utilizing ChatGPT in pharmacy practice must be dependent on evidence-based results that offer profound insight into AI technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100518"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266727662400115X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the pharmacists' perspectives on benefits and risks of using ChatGPT in pharmacy practice and explore how this disruptive and ground-breaking technology can be effectively integrated.

Methods and materials

A qualitative approach that draws data from licensed pharmacists using semi-structured interviews.

Results

Most participants felt ChatGPT could enhance the compliance, use, management, safety, adherence to medication, medication counseling, minimize medication errors, and streamline medication dispensing. However, when Chat-GPT has limited information and relies on obsolete medication databases, it risks providing inaccurate recommendations and inadequate medication details. Also, most participants highlighted the difficulty in interpreting ambiguous patient input or drug descriptions when using the application.

Conclusions

Despite its potential, utilizing ChatGPT in pharmacy practice must be dependent on evidence-based results that offer profound insight into AI technology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解药剂师对 ChatGPT 在药学实践中的价值、风险和应用的看法:定性研究
目的 调查药剂师对在药学实践中使用 ChatGPT 的益处和风险的看法,并探讨如何有效整合这项具有颠覆性和开创性的技术。结果 大多数参与者认为 ChatGPT 可以提高用药的依从性、使用、管理、安全性、依从性和用药咨询,最大限度地减少用药错误并简化配药过程。但是,如果 Chat-GPT 的信息有限,并且依赖于过时的药物数据库,那么它就有可能提供不准确的建议和不充分的药物详细信息。结论尽管 ChatGPT 潜力巨大,但在药学实践中使用它必须依赖于基于证据的结果,这些结果能为人工智能技术提供深刻的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Drug utilisation research and medicine access in Mozambique: An overview. Pharmacist-led Si-care (schizophrenia care) model to improve medication adherence and symptom management in schizophrenia Artificial intelligence in community pharmacy practice: Pharmacists' perceptions, willingness to utilize, and barriers to implementation Pharmaceutical industry use of key opinion leaders to market prescription opioids: A review of internal industry documents Unveiling the complementariness of robotic tablet dispensing machines for elderly care: A bibliometric data analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1