Vinicius S. Nunes , Alexandre P. Rogério , Odonírio Abrahão , Charles N. Serhan
{"title":"Leukotriene B4 receptor 1 (BLT1) activation by leukotriene B4 (LTB4) and E resolvins (RvE1 and RvE2)","authors":"Vinicius S. Nunes , Alexandre P. Rogério , Odonírio Abrahão , Charles N. Serhan","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Leukotriene B4 (LTB<sub>4</sub>) is a lipid inflammatory mediator derived from arachidonic acid (AA). Leukotriene B4 receptor 1 (BLT1), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), is a receptor of LTB<sub>4</sub>. Nonetheless, the resolution of inflammation is driven by specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators (SPMs) such as resolvins E1 (RvE1) and E2 (RvE2). Both resolvins are derived from omega-3 fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). Here, long-term molecular dynamics simulations (MD) were performed to investigate the activation of the BLT1 receptor using two pro-resolution agonists (RvE1 and RvE2) and an inflammatory agonist (LTB<sub>4</sub>). We have analyzed the receptor's activation state, electrostatic interactions, and the binding affinity the Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MMPBSA) approach. The results showed that LTB4 and RvE1 have kept the receptor in an active state by higher simulation time. MD showed that the ligand-receptor interactions occurred mainly through residues H94, R156, and R267. The MMPBSA calculations showed residues R156 and R267 were the two mainly hotspots. Our MMPBSA results were compatible with experimental results from other studies. Overall, the results from this study provide new insights into the activation mechanisms of the BLT1 receptor, reinforcing the role of critical residues and interactions in the binding of pro-resolution and pro-inflammatory agonists.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10616,"journal":{"name":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 108236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147692712400224X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Leukotriene B4 (LTB4) is a lipid inflammatory mediator derived from arachidonic acid (AA). Leukotriene B4 receptor 1 (BLT1), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), is a receptor of LTB4. Nonetheless, the resolution of inflammation is driven by specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators (SPMs) such as resolvins E1 (RvE1) and E2 (RvE2). Both resolvins are derived from omega-3 fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). Here, long-term molecular dynamics simulations (MD) were performed to investigate the activation of the BLT1 receptor using two pro-resolution agonists (RvE1 and RvE2) and an inflammatory agonist (LTB4). We have analyzed the receptor's activation state, electrostatic interactions, and the binding affinity the Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MMPBSA) approach. The results showed that LTB4 and RvE1 have kept the receptor in an active state by higher simulation time. MD showed that the ligand-receptor interactions occurred mainly through residues H94, R156, and R267. The MMPBSA calculations showed residues R156 and R267 were the two mainly hotspots. Our MMPBSA results were compatible with experimental results from other studies. Overall, the results from this study provide new insights into the activation mechanisms of the BLT1 receptor, reinforcing the role of critical residues and interactions in the binding of pro-resolution and pro-inflammatory agonists.
期刊介绍:
Computational Biology and Chemistry publishes original research papers and review articles in all areas of computational life sciences. High quality research contributions with a major computational component in the areas of nucleic acid and protein sequence research, molecular evolution, molecular genetics (functional genomics and proteomics), theory and practice of either biology-specific or chemical-biology-specific modeling, and structural biology of nucleic acids and proteins are particularly welcome. Exceptionally high quality research work in bioinformatics, systems biology, ecology, computational pharmacology, metabolism, biomedical engineering, epidemiology, and statistical genetics will also be considered.
Given their inherent uncertainty, protein modeling and molecular docking studies should be thoroughly validated. In the absence of experimental results for validation, the use of molecular dynamics simulations along with detailed free energy calculations, for example, should be used as complementary techniques to support the major conclusions. Submissions of premature modeling exercises without additional biological insights will not be considered.
Review articles will generally be commissioned by the editors and should not be submitted to the journal without explicit invitation. However prospective authors are welcome to send a brief (one to three pages) synopsis, which will be evaluated by the editors.