Optimizing agitated saline volume for contrast echocardiography: Balancing diagnostic performance and operator fatigue

Medicine Advances Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1002/med4.73
Hezhi Li, Yanying Huang, Dongling Luo, Song Wen, Hongwen Fei, Caojin Zhang
{"title":"Optimizing agitated saline volume for contrast echocardiography: Balancing diagnostic performance and operator fatigue","authors":"Hezhi Li,&nbsp;Yanying Huang,&nbsp;Dongling Luo,&nbsp;Song Wen,&nbsp;Hongwen Fei,&nbsp;Caojin Zhang","doi":"10.1002/med4.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Agitated saline contrast echocardiography, essential for patent foramen ovale detection, typically uses a 10 mL saline protocol, which may lead to operator fatigue and compromise diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to identify an optimal saline volume that balances diagnostic efficacy and minimizes operator fatigue.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty-three patients with suspected patent foramen ovale underwent echocardiography using three saline protocols: 10 mL (9 mL saline + 1 mL air), 7 mL (6.4 mL saline + 0.6 mL air), and 5 mL (4.6 mL saline + 0.4 mL air). The protocols were evaluated for their impact on microbubble signal intensity in the right atrium, right-to-left shunt grading, and operator fatigue, as assessed by the Borg CR10 scale.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The signal intensities were comparable between the 10 mL and 7 mL protocols, while the 5 mL protocol showed significantly lower signal intensities at all time points (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The 7 mL protocol achieved 100% right-to-left shunt grading concordance with the 10 mL protocol, while the 5 mL protocol showed decreased accuracy and recall. Operator fatigue significantly decreased with the reduction in saline volume (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and the 7 mL protocol demonstrated optimal diagnostic accuracy and reduced fatigue.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A 7 mL agitated saline volume is recommended for contrast echocardiography to maintain diagnostic accuracy while significantly reducing operator fatigue, offering a practical balance between diagnostic precision and operator comfort.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100913,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/med4.73","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/med4.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Agitated saline contrast echocardiography, essential for patent foramen ovale detection, typically uses a 10 mL saline protocol, which may lead to operator fatigue and compromise diagnostic accuracy. This study aimed to identify an optimal saline volume that balances diagnostic efficacy and minimizes operator fatigue.

Methods

Fifty-three patients with suspected patent foramen ovale underwent echocardiography using three saline protocols: 10 mL (9 mL saline + 1 mL air), 7 mL (6.4 mL saline + 0.6 mL air), and 5 mL (4.6 mL saline + 0.4 mL air). The protocols were evaluated for their impact on microbubble signal intensity in the right atrium, right-to-left shunt grading, and operator fatigue, as assessed by the Borg CR10 scale.

Results

The signal intensities were comparable between the 10 mL and 7 mL protocols, while the 5 mL protocol showed significantly lower signal intensities at all time points (p < 0.001). The 7 mL protocol achieved 100% right-to-left shunt grading concordance with the 10 mL protocol, while the 5 mL protocol showed decreased accuracy and recall. Operator fatigue significantly decreased with the reduction in saline volume (p < 0.001), and the 7 mL protocol demonstrated optimal diagnostic accuracy and reduced fatigue.

Conclusion

A 7 mL agitated saline volume is recommended for contrast echocardiography to maintain diagnostic accuracy while significantly reducing operator fatigue, offering a practical balance between diagnostic precision and operator comfort.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化造影剂超声心动图的生理盐水容量:平衡诊断性能与操作员疲劳
背景 搅拌生理盐水造影超声心动图是检测卵圆孔未闭的必要方法,通常使用 10 mL 生理盐水,这可能会导致操作者疲劳并影响诊断准确性。本研究旨在找出既能兼顾诊断效果又能最大程度减轻操作者疲劳的最佳生理盐水量。 方法 53 名疑似卵圆孔未闭患者使用三种生理盐水方案接受超声心动图检查:10 mL(9 mL 生理盐水 + 1 mL 空气)、7 mL(6.4 mL 生理盐水 + 0.6 mL 空气)和 5 mL(4.6 mL 生理盐水 + 0.4 mL 空气)。根据 Borg CR10 量表评估了这些方案对右心房微泡信号强度、右向左分流分级和操作者疲劳度的影响。 结果 10 mL 和 7 mL 方案的信号强度相当,而 5 mL 方案在所有时间点的信号强度都明显较低(p < 0.001)。7 mL 方案与 10 mL 方案的右向左分流分级一致性达到 100%,而 5 mL 方案的准确性和召回率有所下降。随着生理盐水容量的减少,操作员的疲劳度明显降低(p < 0.001),7 mL 方案显示出最佳的诊断准确性并减少了疲劳度。 结论 建议在造影超声心动图检查中使用 7 毫升的搅拌生理盐水,以保持诊断准确性,同时显著减轻操作者的疲劳,在诊断准确性和操作舒适性之间取得切实可行的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Prognostic significance of ratio of positive lymph nodes in patients with operable major salivary ductal carcinoma Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic education: A comparative analysis of ChatGPT and Bing AI's Orthopaedic In-Training Examination performance Anti-synthetase syndrome complicated by multifocal tuberculosis: A thought-provoking differential diagnosis with tumors Toward bridging gaps in patient navigation: A study on the adoption of artificial intelligence technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1