Seismic fragility and resilience assessment of large-span cable-stayed bridges under multi-support ground motions with non-Gaussian characteristics

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1002/eqe.4220
Yucong Lan, Jun Xu, Jian Zhong, Yang Li
{"title":"Seismic fragility and resilience assessment of large-span cable-stayed bridges under multi-support ground motions with non-Gaussian characteristics","authors":"Yucong Lan,&nbsp;Jun Xu,&nbsp;Jian Zhong,&nbsp;Yang Li","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Seismic fragility analysis and resilience assessment of large-span cable-stayed bridge structures are critical for evaluating their seismic performance. However, there is a scarcity of research on the effects of multi-support ground motions and their non-Gaussian characteristics on seismic fragility and resilience. This paper aims to addresses this issue. Initially, random ground motions with spatial variability and non-Gaussian characteristics are simulated using the Spectral Representation Method (SRM) and the Unified Hermite Polynomial Model (UHPM). Subsequently, the Fractional Exponential Moments-based Maximum Entropy Method (FEM-MEM) and the Adaptive Gaussian Mixture Model (AGMM) are employed for seismic reliability-based fragility analysis, overcoming the shortcomings of conventional lognormal assumption. Component- and system-level fragility analyses are conducted sequentially, followed by seismic resilience assessment of bridge structures based on the results of system-level fragility analysis. A numerical example is presented to validate the proposed method. Computational results indicate that: (1) The proposed method offers higher accuracy and broader applicability for seismic fragility analysis of large-span cable-stayed bridge structures compared to traditional assumptions. (2) The non-Gaussian characteristics of ground motions may significantly impact the seismic fragility analysis and resilience assessment of large-span bridge structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"53 14","pages":"4310-4333"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4220","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seismic fragility analysis and resilience assessment of large-span cable-stayed bridge structures are critical for evaluating their seismic performance. However, there is a scarcity of research on the effects of multi-support ground motions and their non-Gaussian characteristics on seismic fragility and resilience. This paper aims to addresses this issue. Initially, random ground motions with spatial variability and non-Gaussian characteristics are simulated using the Spectral Representation Method (SRM) and the Unified Hermite Polynomial Model (UHPM). Subsequently, the Fractional Exponential Moments-based Maximum Entropy Method (FEM-MEM) and the Adaptive Gaussian Mixture Model (AGMM) are employed for seismic reliability-based fragility analysis, overcoming the shortcomings of conventional lognormal assumption. Component- and system-level fragility analyses are conducted sequentially, followed by seismic resilience assessment of bridge structures based on the results of system-level fragility analysis. A numerical example is presented to validate the proposed method. Computational results indicate that: (1) The proposed method offers higher accuracy and broader applicability for seismic fragility analysis of large-span cable-stayed bridge structures compared to traditional assumptions. (2) The non-Gaussian characteristics of ground motions may significantly impact the seismic fragility analysis and resilience assessment of large-span bridge structures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非高斯特性多支撑地面运动下大跨度斜拉桥的地震脆性和回弹性评估
大跨度斜拉桥结构的地震脆性分析和回弹评估对于评估其抗震性能至关重要。然而,有关多支撑地面运动及其非高斯特性对地震脆性和抗震性影响的研究却很少。本文旨在解决这一问题。首先,使用频谱表示法(SRM)和统一赫尔墨特多项式模型(UHPM)模拟了具有空间变异性和非高斯特征的随机地面运动。随后,采用基于分数指数矩的最大熵方法(FEM-MEM)和自适应高斯混合模型(AGMM)进行基于地震可靠性的脆性分析,克服了传统对数正态假设的缺点。依次进行构件级和系统级脆性分析,然后根据系统级脆性分析结果对桥梁结构进行抗震性评估。通过一个数值实例验证了所提出的方法。计算结果表明(1) 与传统假设相比,所提出的方法在大跨度斜拉桥结构的地震脆性分析中具有更高的精度和更广泛的适用性。(2) 地面运动的非高斯特征可能对大跨度桥梁结构的地震脆性分析和抗震评估产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
期刊最新文献
Issue information Issue information SSI-induced seismic earth pressures on an integral abutment bridge model: Experimental measurements versus numerical simulations and code provisions Estimation of inelastic displacement ratio spectrum for existing RC structures via displacement response spectrum Linear equivalence for motion amplification devices in earthquake engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1