Advance healthcare directives and advance choice documents in psychiatry: New resources, new legislation, new opportunities

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q1 LAW International Journal of Law and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102030
{"title":"Advance healthcare directives and advance choice documents in psychiatry: New resources, new legislation, new opportunities","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, bodies such as the United Nations and the World Health Organization have highlighted the need for mental healthcare and legislation to better conform to contemporary human rights principles. They place particular emphasis on the right of people with mental health conditions to make their own decisions in all areas of life, including mental health treatment. One of the challenges in this context is that a person can lose the capacity to make these decisions during episodes of severe mental illness. Advance Healthcare Directives (AHDs), also known as Advance Choice Documents (ACDs), can help to overcome this challenge and allow people to exercise more agency over their care choices. AHDs are statements about the type of treatment a person would or would not like to receive in future if they are in a situation where they require treatment but are unable to make or communicate their decision. Despite an expanding body of evidence that AHDs enhance autonomy and are supported by patients and staff alike, uptake of AHDs is extremely low across many jurisdictions. Legislative reform and educational initiatives to enhance knowledge and awareness are vital for advancing and enlivening this field in clinical practice. This paper explores one such legislative development (Ireland's Assisted Decision Making (Capacity) Act, 2015) and one such educational initiative (the <span><span>www.advancechoice.org</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> website and videos). We highlight the need for further developments in the realms of both legislative reform and outreach and accessibility, in addition to greater advocacy by clinicians for the use of AHDs in mental health care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47930,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160252724000797","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, bodies such as the United Nations and the World Health Organization have highlighted the need for mental healthcare and legislation to better conform to contemporary human rights principles. They place particular emphasis on the right of people with mental health conditions to make their own decisions in all areas of life, including mental health treatment. One of the challenges in this context is that a person can lose the capacity to make these decisions during episodes of severe mental illness. Advance Healthcare Directives (AHDs), also known as Advance Choice Documents (ACDs), can help to overcome this challenge and allow people to exercise more agency over their care choices. AHDs are statements about the type of treatment a person would or would not like to receive in future if they are in a situation where they require treatment but are unable to make or communicate their decision. Despite an expanding body of evidence that AHDs enhance autonomy and are supported by patients and staff alike, uptake of AHDs is extremely low across many jurisdictions. Legislative reform and educational initiatives to enhance knowledge and awareness are vital for advancing and enlivening this field in clinical practice. This paper explores one such legislative development (Ireland's Assisted Decision Making (Capacity) Act, 2015) and one such educational initiative (the www.advancechoice.org website and videos). We highlight the need for further developments in the realms of both legislative reform and outreach and accessibility, in addition to greater advocacy by clinicians for the use of AHDs in mental health care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神病学中的预先医疗指示和预先选择文件:新资源、新立法、新机遇
近年来,联合国和世界卫生组织等机构强调,精神保健和立法必须更好地符合当代人 权原则。它们特别强调精神疾病患者有权在生活的各个领域,包括精神健康治疗方面,做出自己的决定。在这种情况下所面临的挑战之一就是,在严重的精神疾病发作期间,患者可能会丧失做出这些决定的能力。预先医疗指示(Advance Healthcare Directives,AHDs),也被称为 "预先选择文件"(Advance Choice Documents,ACDs),可以帮助人们克服这一挑战,让他们对自己的护理选择有更多的自主权。预先医疗指示是一个人在需要治疗但无法做出或表达其决定的情况下,就其将来希望或不希望接受的治疗类型做出的声明。尽管有越来越多的证据表明,自动生 存决定可提高自主性,并得到患者和医务人员的支持,但在许多司法管辖区,自动生 存决定的采用率极低。要想在临床实践中推进并活跃这一领域的发展,立法改革和提高知识与意识的教育措施至关重要。本文探讨了此类立法发展(2015 年爱尔兰《辅助决策(能力)法》)和教育举措(www.advancechoice.org 网站和视频)。我们强调,除了临床医生在心理健康护理中使用辅助决策能力的更大宣传力度之外,还需要在立法改革、外联和可及性方面取得进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry is intended to provide a multi-disciplinary forum for the exchange of ideas and information among professionals concerned with the interface of law and psychiatry. There is a growing awareness of the need for exploring the fundamental goals of both the legal and psychiatric systems and the social implications of their interaction. The journal seeks to enhance understanding and cooperation in the field through the varied approaches represented, not only by law and psychiatry, but also by the social sciences and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Global prevalence of borderline personality disorder and self-reported symptoms of adults in prison: A systematic review and meta-analysis Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) and the criminal justice system: A guide for legal professionals Advance healthcare directives and advance choice documents in psychiatry: New resources, new legislation, new opportunities Policing psychiatric illness: An organisational paradox for Health & Law Antisocial personality disorder and determinants among prisoners in South Gondar zone correctional institutions, Northwest Ethiopia: An institution-based cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1