Comparison of Vascular Complications Between Living-donor and Deceased-donor Liver Transplantation – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102414
Suprabhat Giri , Sarat Chandra Panigrahi , Vedavyas Mohapatra , Preetam Nath , Saroj K. Sahu , Bipadabhanjan Mallick , Dibya L. Praharaj , Anil C. Anand
{"title":"Comparison of Vascular Complications Between Living-donor and Deceased-donor Liver Transplantation – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Suprabhat Giri ,&nbsp;Sarat Chandra Panigrahi ,&nbsp;Vedavyas Mohapatra ,&nbsp;Preetam Nath ,&nbsp;Saroj K. Sahu ,&nbsp;Bipadabhanjan Mallick ,&nbsp;Dibya L. Praharaj ,&nbsp;Anil C. Anand","doi":"10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vascular complications commonly cause graft loss and morbidity after liver transplantation (LT). Comparative data on the risk of vascular complications are limited. Hence, the present meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the difference in vascular complications between living-donor LT (LDLT) and deceased-donor LT (DDLT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search of three databases was conducted for studies comparing the incidence of vascular complications with LDLT and DDLT. The event rates and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 20 studies were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in the incidence of overall vascular complications (9.3%, 95% CI: 6.6–12.0 vs. 8.5%, 95% CI: 5.6–11.4) between LDLT and DDLT with OR 0.94 (95% CI: 0.73–1.21) (15 studies).There was a higher incidence of vascular complications with LDLT in older studies (published before 2013) but not in new studies. When comparing the individual complications, LDLT was associated with a higher incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) (3.8%, 95% CI: 2.4–5.2 vs. 1.6%, 95% CI: 1.1–2.2)with OR 2.20 (95% CI: 1.53–3.17) (14 studies)and a significantly lower incidence of intra-abdominal bleeding(4.8%, 95% CI: 3.3–6.2 vs. 7.9%, 95% CI: 5.0–10.7) with OR 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47–0.87) (11 studies). However, there was no difference in the incidence (2.1%, 95% CI: 0.5–3.8 vs. 1.0%, 95% CI: 0.1–1.9) of portal vein thrombosis between LDLT and DDLT with OR 1.85 (95% CI: 0.82–4.18) (6 studies).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite a comparable risk of vascular complications between LDLT and DDLT, LDLT was associated with a higher risk of HAT and a lower risk of intraprocedural bleeding. Further studies are required to analyze the effect of donor-recipient characteristics and surgical techniques on the risk of vascular complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15479,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","volume":"15 1","pages":"Article 102414"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973688324010818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Vascular complications commonly cause graft loss and morbidity after liver transplantation (LT). Comparative data on the risk of vascular complications are limited. Hence, the present meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the difference in vascular complications between living-donor LT (LDLT) and deceased-donor LT (DDLT).

Methods

A literature search of three databases was conducted for studies comparing the incidence of vascular complications with LDLT and DDLT. The event rates and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model.

Results

A total of 20 studies were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in the incidence of overall vascular complications (9.3%, 95% CI: 6.6–12.0 vs. 8.5%, 95% CI: 5.6–11.4) between LDLT and DDLT with OR 0.94 (95% CI: 0.73–1.21) (15 studies).There was a higher incidence of vascular complications with LDLT in older studies (published before 2013) but not in new studies. When comparing the individual complications, LDLT was associated with a higher incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) (3.8%, 95% CI: 2.4–5.2 vs. 1.6%, 95% CI: 1.1–2.2)with OR 2.20 (95% CI: 1.53–3.17) (14 studies)and a significantly lower incidence of intra-abdominal bleeding(4.8%, 95% CI: 3.3–6.2 vs. 7.9%, 95% CI: 5.0–10.7) with OR 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47–0.87) (11 studies). However, there was no difference in the incidence (2.1%, 95% CI: 0.5–3.8 vs. 1.0%, 95% CI: 0.1–1.9) of portal vein thrombosis between LDLT and DDLT with OR 1.85 (95% CI: 0.82–4.18) (6 studies).

Conclusion

Despite a comparable risk of vascular complications between LDLT and DDLT, LDLT was associated with a higher risk of HAT and a lower risk of intraprocedural bleeding. Further studies are required to analyze the effect of donor-recipient characteristics and surgical techniques on the risk of vascular complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活体肝移植与死体肝移植血管并发症的比较 - 系统回顾与 Meta 分析
背景肝移植(LT)后,血管并发症通常会导致移植物丢失和发病。有关血管并发症风险的比较数据十分有限。因此,本荟萃分析旨在分析活体供体肝移植(LDLT)与死体供体肝移植(DDLT)在血管并发症方面的差异。方法检索三个数据库中的文献,比较活体供体肝移植与死体供体肝移植的血管并发症发生率。采用随机效应模型计算了事件发生率和几率比(OR)以及 95% 的置信区间(CI)。LDLT 和 DDLT 的总体血管并发症发生率没有差异(9.3%,95% CI:6.6-12.0 vs. 8.5%,95% CI:5.6-11.4),OR 为 0.94(95% CI:0.73-1.21)(15 项研究)。在比较单个并发症时,LDLT与肝动脉血栓形成(HAT)发生率较高(3.8%,95% CI:2.4-5.2 vs. 1.6%,95% CI:1.1-2.2)相关,OR值为2.20(95% CI:1.腹腔内出血的发生率明显降低(4.8%,95% CI:3.3-6.2 vs. 7.9%,95% CI:5.0-10.7),OR 为 0.64(95% CI:0.47-0.87)(11 项研究)。尽管 LDLT 和 DDLT 的血管并发症风险相当,但 LDLT 与较高的 HAT 风险和较低的术中出血风险相关。需要进一步研究分析供体-受体特征和手术技术对血管并发症风险的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
64 days
期刊最新文献
Genes of DLK1-DIO3 Locus and miR-379/656 Cluster is a Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systems Biology Study Toward Rational Strategies for Prevention of Bleeding During Invasive Procedures in Patients With Cirrhosis Issue Highlights The SVIN-Trial—Just Another Brick in the Wall? Safety and Effectiveness of Naltrexone in the Management of Alcohol Use Disorder in Patients With Alcohol-associated Cirrhosis: First Clinical Observation From Indian Cohort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1