Comparison of Vascular Complications Between Living-donor and Deceased-donor Liver Transplantation – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102414
Suprabhat Giri , Sarat Chandra Panigrahi , Vedavyas Mohapatra , Preetam Nath , Saroj K. Sahu , Bipadabhanjan Mallick , Dibya L. Praharaj , Anil C. Anand
{"title":"Comparison of Vascular Complications Between Living-donor and Deceased-donor Liver Transplantation – A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Suprabhat Giri ,&nbsp;Sarat Chandra Panigrahi ,&nbsp;Vedavyas Mohapatra ,&nbsp;Preetam Nath ,&nbsp;Saroj K. Sahu ,&nbsp;Bipadabhanjan Mallick ,&nbsp;Dibya L. Praharaj ,&nbsp;Anil C. Anand","doi":"10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vascular complications commonly cause graft loss and morbidity after liver transplantation (LT). Comparative data on the risk of vascular complications are limited. Hence, the present meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the difference in vascular complications between living-donor LT (LDLT) and deceased-donor LT (DDLT).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search of three databases was conducted for studies comparing the incidence of vascular complications with LDLT and DDLT. The event rates and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 20 studies were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in the incidence of overall vascular complications (9.3%, 95% CI: 6.6–12.0 vs. 8.5%, 95% CI: 5.6–11.4) between LDLT and DDLT with OR 0.94 (95% CI: 0.73–1.21) (15 studies).There was a higher incidence of vascular complications with LDLT in older studies (published before 2013) but not in new studies. When comparing the individual complications, LDLT was associated with a higher incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) (3.8%, 95% CI: 2.4–5.2 vs. 1.6%, 95% CI: 1.1–2.2)with OR 2.20 (95% CI: 1.53–3.17) (14 studies)and a significantly lower incidence of intra-abdominal bleeding(4.8%, 95% CI: 3.3–6.2 vs. 7.9%, 95% CI: 5.0–10.7) with OR 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47–0.87) (11 studies). However, there was no difference in the incidence (2.1%, 95% CI: 0.5–3.8 vs. 1.0%, 95% CI: 0.1–1.9) of portal vein thrombosis between LDLT and DDLT with OR 1.85 (95% CI: 0.82–4.18) (6 studies).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite a comparable risk of vascular complications between LDLT and DDLT, LDLT was associated with a higher risk of HAT and a lower risk of intraprocedural bleeding. Further studies are required to analyze the effect of donor-recipient characteristics and surgical techniques on the risk of vascular complications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15479,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973688324010818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Vascular complications commonly cause graft loss and morbidity after liver transplantation (LT). Comparative data on the risk of vascular complications are limited. Hence, the present meta-analysis was conducted to analyze the difference in vascular complications between living-donor LT (LDLT) and deceased-donor LT (DDLT).

Methods

A literature search of three databases was conducted for studies comparing the incidence of vascular complications with LDLT and DDLT. The event rates and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model.

Results

A total of 20 studies were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in the incidence of overall vascular complications (9.3%, 95% CI: 6.6–12.0 vs. 8.5%, 95% CI: 5.6–11.4) between LDLT and DDLT with OR 0.94 (95% CI: 0.73–1.21) (15 studies).There was a higher incidence of vascular complications with LDLT in older studies (published before 2013) but not in new studies. When comparing the individual complications, LDLT was associated with a higher incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) (3.8%, 95% CI: 2.4–5.2 vs. 1.6%, 95% CI: 1.1–2.2)with OR 2.20 (95% CI: 1.53–3.17) (14 studies)and a significantly lower incidence of intra-abdominal bleeding(4.8%, 95% CI: 3.3–6.2 vs. 7.9%, 95% CI: 5.0–10.7) with OR 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47–0.87) (11 studies). However, there was no difference in the incidence (2.1%, 95% CI: 0.5–3.8 vs. 1.0%, 95% CI: 0.1–1.9) of portal vein thrombosis between LDLT and DDLT with OR 1.85 (95% CI: 0.82–4.18) (6 studies).

Conclusion

Despite a comparable risk of vascular complications between LDLT and DDLT, LDLT was associated with a higher risk of HAT and a lower risk of intraprocedural bleeding. Further studies are required to analyze the effect of donor-recipient characteristics and surgical techniques on the risk of vascular complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活体肝移植与死体肝移植血管并发症的比较 - 系统回顾与 Meta 分析
背景肝移植(LT)后,血管并发症通常会导致移植物丢失和发病。有关血管并发症风险的比较数据十分有限。因此,本荟萃分析旨在分析活体供体肝移植(LDLT)与死体供体肝移植(DDLT)在血管并发症方面的差异。方法检索三个数据库中的文献,比较活体供体肝移植与死体供体肝移植的血管并发症发生率。采用随机效应模型计算了事件发生率和几率比(OR)以及 95% 的置信区间(CI)。LDLT 和 DDLT 的总体血管并发症发生率没有差异(9.3%,95% CI:6.6-12.0 vs. 8.5%,95% CI:5.6-11.4),OR 为 0.94(95% CI:0.73-1.21)(15 项研究)。在比较单个并发症时,LDLT与肝动脉血栓形成(HAT)发生率较高(3.8%,95% CI:2.4-5.2 vs. 1.6%,95% CI:1.1-2.2)相关,OR值为2.20(95% CI:1.腹腔内出血的发生率明显降低(4.8%,95% CI:3.3-6.2 vs. 7.9%,95% CI:5.0-10.7),OR 为 0.64(95% CI:0.47-0.87)(11 项研究)。尽管 LDLT 和 DDLT 的血管并发症风险相当,但 LDLT 与较高的 HAT 风险和较低的术中出血风险相关。需要进一步研究分析供体-受体特征和手术技术对血管并发症风险的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
64 days
期刊最新文献
Issue Highlights Improved Outcomes of Liver Transplantation in Patients With Hepatitis C, Following the Introduction of Innovative Antiviral Therapies Complex Interaction Between Visceral Adiposity and Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Clinical, Histopathological, and Immunophenotypic Spectrum of Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: Eight Years’ Data of a Tertiary Care Center from North India Metabolic Liver Diseases Presenting as Pediatric Onset Hypoglycemia: A Hepatologist's Primer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1